Interim Order 8

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CC NI ACT 4092/2023
SHWETA JAIN Vs. NANDLAL GOYAL /0 (North Rohini)
Proceedings conducted online through Video Conferencing using CISCO WEBEX Software.
Counsels are directed to appear with Camera open.
Presence of the accused will not be marked if his or her video is off.
25.02.2025
Present: Sh. Rishabh Jain, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
Sh. Sagar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for accused.
Matter is listed for arguments on application u/s 145(2) of NI Act.
An application u/s 145(2) NI Act has been filed on behalf of the accused. Taken on
record.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant submits that he has received the copy of the aforesaid
application at 10.08 am and not in advance as directed in the last order.
Exemption has been sought on behalf of the accused.
Ld. Counsel for the accused submits that the accused is out of town therefore he is not
able to join the court’s proceedings. Present court being a digital court does not require physical
presence of the accused despite that accused has not appeared before the court. No cogent reason has
been provided for the absence of the accused even through VC.
In view of the conduct of the accused, a cost of Rs.1000/- is imposed on the accused to
be paid to the complainant on the next date of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant submits that the old AR of the complainant has been
changed due to unavoidable circumstances and medical restraints of the old AR. He has filed afresh
evidence by way of affidavit of the new AR alongwith an application seeking his substitution and copy
of the same has been supplied to Ld. Counsel for the accused. Taken on record.
However Ld. Proxy Counsel for accused submits that he has no brief regarding the
same.
Put up for arguments on the aforesaid applications on 21.04.2025.
(Garima Garg)
Judicial Magistrate First Class
(NI Act) Digital Court-01, North West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/25.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --