Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 6

CNR DLNW02003135202422 Apr 2025
Rohini North-West, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 6 · 22 Apr 2025 · CNR DLNW020031352024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23CC NI ACT/321/2024
Darshan co operative Urban Vs. RajKumar/0 (Prem Nagar)
Proceedings conducted online through Video Conferencing using CISCO WEBEX
Software.
Counsels are directed to appear with Camera open.
Presence of the accused will not be marked if his or her video is off.
Reader cum Ahlmad is on leave today and Assistant Ahlmad is working as Reader cum
Ahlmad of Digital Court -02.
The stenographer of this court is working in the dual capacity of stenographer as well as
Reader cum Ahlmad for the day.
22.04.2025
Present: Sh. Shrawan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
Sh. Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the accused alongwith accused.
Matter is listed for furnishing bail bonds, surety bonds and consideration on
notice.
Vide order dated 22.01.2025, matter was referred to the mediation cell.
Ld. Counsel for the accused submits that the accused does not wish to settle the
matter.
Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. has been framed against the accused to which
he pleads not guilty and claims trial.
The scanned copy of the same has been received on court mail ID. Original
therefore be deposited in the court. Notice has been digitally signed by the undersigned and the
same would form part of the digital file.
Admission denial u/s 294 CrPC has been recorded separately and subsequent to
that witnesses at Sr. no. 2 and 3 from the list of witnesses in the complaint stands dropped.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has no objection if accused is allowed to cross-
examine the complainant on the basis of oral application u/s 145 (2) NI Act.
In view of the judgment/ order of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in ‘Century
Alumunium Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Hero Fincorp Limited, CRL. M.C. 3402/2021
dated 21.12.2021, and on account of defence disclosed in Notice framed u/s 251 CrPC, the plea
of the accused to cross-examine the complainant is hearby allowed.
-- 1 of 2 --
Accordingly, accused is allowed to cross-examine the complainant on the next
date of hearing and the requirement of filing of formal application u/s 145 (2) NI Act is
dispenced off.
From now on this, summary trial is converted into summons trial and further
proceedings will be conducted in a summons trial manner.
Let previous cost if any be paid on the next date of hearing.
Be put up for CE on 19.08.2025.
Both the parties/counsels have expressed their willingness to appear at Court
Room no. 103, Tis Hazari Court ( New Building ) on the next date of hearing for
recording of the evidence. They have been apprised of the fact that there is no
requirement of them appearing physically as the present court is a digital court. Despite
the same, both the parties request to appear at Court Room no. 103, Tis Hazari Court.
(Garima Garg)
Judicial Magistrate First Class
(NI Act) Digital Court-01, North West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/22.04.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.