Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11
CS DJ 894/24
DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. SANT RAM
29.04.2025
Present: Sh. Harvinder Dass, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sanjeev Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Amended written statement of defendant is reflecting
on CIS as uploaded on 12.02.2025.
Pleadings are stated to be complete.
Submissions heard on the settlement of issues.
From the submissions and pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed as arises:-
(1) Whether the relief of decree of cancellation of
Agreement to Sell dated 28.09.2005 is valued for purposes of
court fees and jurisdiction in accordance with law, if not, its
effect ? OPP
(2) Whether the suit qua reliefs of cancellation of
documents is within limitation ? OPP
(3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the registered GPA dated
23.09.2005, bearing registration no. 7269, Additional Book No.
4, Volume No. 142, on pages 26 to 32 (alleged to be executed by
plaintiffs in favour of defendant) qua the share of Late Sh. Bhagat
Singh i.e. 1/4th share in land measuring 1835 sq. yds out of
Khasra No. 15/1/2 and 2/1 situated in village Mohd. Pur Majri,
Delhi as claimed ? OPP
(4) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the Agreement to sell dated
-- 1 of 3 --
..2..
28.09.2005 (alleged to be executed by plaintiffs in favour of
defendant ) qua the share of Late Sh. Bhagat Singh i.e. 1/4th
share in land measuring 1835 sq. yds out of Khasra No. 15/1/2
and 2/1 situated in village Mohd. Pur Majri, Delhi as claimed ?
OPP
(5) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the Receipt dated 28.09.2005
(alleged to be executed by plaintiffs in favour of defendant ) qua
the share of Late Sh. Bhagat Singh i.e. 1/4th share in land
measuring 1835 sq. yds out of Khasra No. 15/1/2 and 2/1 situated
in village Mohd. Pur Majri, Delhi as claimed ? OPP
(6) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the Affidavit dated 28.09.2005
(alleged to be executed by plaintiffs in favour of defendant ) qua
the share of Late Sh. Bhagat Singh i.e. 1/4th share in land
measuring 1835 sq. yds out of Khasra No. 15/1/2 and 2/1 situated
in village Mohd. Pur Majri, Delhi as claimed ? OPP
(7) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the Possession Letter dated
28.09.2005 (alleged to be executed by plaintiffs in favour of
defendant ) qua the share of Late Sh. Bhagat Singh i.e. 1/4th
share in land measuring 1835 sq. yds out of Khasra No. 15/1/2
and 2/1 situated in village Mohd. Pur Majri, Delhi as claimed ?
OPP
(8) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the registered Will executed by
plaintiff no. 1 in favour of defendant, bearing registration no.
-- 2 of 3 --
..3..
4993, Book No. 3, Vol. No. 26, on pages 163 dated 30.09.2005 as
claimed ? OPP
(9) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
cancellation thereby cancelling the registered Will executed by
plaintiff no. 2 in favour of defendant, bearing registration no.
4996, Book No. 3, Vol. No. 26, on pages 166 dated 30.09.2005 as
claimed ? OPP
(10) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
permanent injunction as claimed ? OPP
(11) Whether the suit is bad for non joinder of
necessary parties as mentioned in para 6 of preliminary
objections of written statement ? OPD
(12) Relief.
No other issue arises or pressed for. The counsels
appearing for the parties stated that there is no likelihood of the
settlement of matter between the parties at this stage, as such,
there is no use of referring the parties to adopt ADR means. List
of witnesses be filed within 15 days by the parties.
Put up for plaintiff's evidence for 26.08.2025.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 29.04.2025
-- 3 of 3 --