Mehul SehgalVsMUKESH SEHGAL

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
21.05.2026
Present : Sh. Harsh Yadav, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff prays for adjournment. He submits that
he wishes to file an application for amendment of plaint.
At his request, the case is adjourned to 04.02.2027.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
21.05.2026
21.05.2026
File is taken up again on the appearance of Ld. counsel for
defendant no. 1 with defendant no. 1.
Present : Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 with defendant
no. 1.
At request of Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 and defendant no.
1, the fact that they have appeared at this stage is recorded. They are apprised
of the order. Put up on date fixed.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
21.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
21.05.2026
Present : Sh. Harsh Yadav, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff prays for adjournment. He submits that
he wishes to file an application for amendment of plaint.
At his request, the case is adjourned to 04.02.2027.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
21.05.2026
21.05.2026
File is taken up again on the appearance of Ld. counsel for
defendant no. 1 with defendant no. 1.
Present : Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 with defendant
no. 1.
At request of Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 and defendant no.
1, the fact that they have appeared at this stage is recorded. They are apprised
of the order. Put up on date fixed.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
21.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
22.09.2025
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 with
defendant no. 1.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he was not able to take
steps for issuance of process in terms of previous order. He submits that
he has suffered a fracture. He is also limping in the court. He prays for
one more opportunity to take steps.
The request is strongly opposed.
The request is, however, allowed.
On taking of steps within one week, fresh process be issued
for service upon defendant no. 2 in terms of previous order.
Receipt of deposit of previous cost be filed along with PF
for issuance of notice.
Renotify on 21.05.2026.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
22.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
22.09.2025
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 with
defendant no. 1.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he was not able to take
steps for issuance of process in terms of previous order. He submits that
he has suffered a fracture. He is also limping in the court. He prays for
one more opportunity to take steps.
The request is strongly opposed.
The request is, however, allowed.
On taking of steps within one week, fresh process be issued
for service upon defendant no. 2 in terms of previous order.
Receipt of deposit of previous cost be filed along with PF
for issuance of notice.
Renotify on 21.05.2026.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
22.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 749/24 Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
05.05.2025
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
PF not filed for service of defendant no. 2. This is the
second ocassion when the PF has not been filed. Cost of Rs.500/- is
imposed upon the plaintiff to be deposited in the DLSA Fund, N/W. Cost
receipt be filed along with the P, within 07 days failing which the suit
shall be dismissed against the defendant no. 2.
Ld. counsel for the defendant no. 1 submits that the present
suit is barred by limitation and a preliminary issue be framed in this
regard. Allowed. A preliminary issue is framed as under :-
“Whether the present suit is barred by limitation? OPD”.
Put up for arguments on preliminary issues on 22.09.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/05.05.2025
At this stage, at 12:15 p.m., Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. counsel
for the plaintiff has appeared. He is apprised of the next date of hearing.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/05.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 749/24 Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh Sehgal
05.05.2025
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
PF not filed for service of defendant no. 2. This is the
second ocassion when the PF has not been filed. Cost of Rs.500/- is
imposed upon the plaintiff to be deposited in the DLSA Fund, N/W. Cost
receipt be filed along with the P, within 07 days failing which the suit
shall be dismissed against the defendant no. 2.
Ld. counsel for the defendant no. 1 submits that the present
suit is barred by limitation and a preliminary issue be framed in this
regard. Allowed. A preliminary issue is framed as under :-
“Whether the present suit is barred by limitation? OPD”.
Put up for arguments on preliminary issues on 22.09.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/05.05.2025
At this stage, at 12:15 p.m., Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. counsel
for the plaintiff has appeared. He is apprised of the next date of hearing.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/05.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS DJ 749/24 Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
13.02.2025
Present : Ms. Pallavi Vashishth, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
None for the defendant no. 2.
Steps not taken by the plaintiff for the service of the
defendant no. 2.
Let previous order be complied with afresh on filing of PF
within 07 days from today, returnable on 05.05.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS DJ 749/24 Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
13.02.2025
Present : Ms. Pallavi Vashishth, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
None for the defendant no. 2.
Steps not taken by the plaintiff for the service of the
defendant no. 2.
Let previous order be complied with afresh on filing of PF
within 07 days from today, returnable on 05.05.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
30.11.2024
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Summons have been served upon both the defendants. The
defendant no. 1 has already filed the WS, reply to application under
Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and Vakalatnama on 20.11.2024 along with
proof of service on the e-mail ID as mentioned on the memo of parties.
However, another copy supplied in the Court today.
Perusal of the summons report shows that the summons to
defendant no. 2 have been accepted by the defendant no. 1 who is his
father. However, it is submitted that he is not representing him and they
are not on talking terms. Hence, the Court is inclined to issue fresh
summons to the defendant no. 2. Same be served through afffixation as
well. PF be filed within 7 days.
Put up for further proceedings for 13.02.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
30.11.2024
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Ajeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 with
defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Summons have been served upon both the defendants. The
defendant no. 1 has already filed the WS, reply to application under
Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and Vakalatnama on 20.11.2024 along with
proof of service on the e-mail ID as mentioned on the memo of parties.
However, another copy supplied in the Court today.
Perusal of the summons report shows that the summons to
defendant no. 2 have been accepted by the defendant no. 1 who is his
father. However, it is submitted that he is not representing him and they
are not on talking terms. Hence, the Court is inclined to issue fresh
summons to the defendant no. 2. Same be served through afffixation as
well. PF be filed within 7 days.
Put up for further proceedings for 13.02.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
11.09.2024
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues to the
defendant on filing of PF and RC/speed post returnable on next date of
hearing. PF be filed within 07 days from today.
In case of refusal of the summons, the process server is
directed to furnish his affidavit regarding the proof of service or to
appear in the court on the NDOH for recording of his statement. Ahlmad
is directed to make the endorsement on the summons accordingly.
The defendant is directed to file his written statement within
30 days from the date of service of the summons. Endorsement be made
on the summons accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.11.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/11.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ 749/24
Mehul Sehgal Vs. Mukesh sehgal
11.09.2024
Present : Sh. R.S. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues to the
defendant on filing of PF and RC/speed post returnable on next date of
hearing. PF be filed within 07 days from today.
In case of refusal of the summons, the process server is
directed to furnish his affidavit regarding the proof of service or to
appear in the court on the NDOH for recording of his statement. Ahlmad
is directed to make the endorsement on the summons accordingly.
The defendant is directed to file his written statement within
30 days from the date of service of the summons. Endorsement be made
on the summons accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.11.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/11.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ no. 749/2024
MEHUL SEHGAL
VS.
MUKESH SEHGAL AND ANR.
23.08.2024
Fresh suit has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered as per law.
At 03.30 pm
Present : None.
Put up for appearance of the plaintiff on 11.09.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ no. 749/2024
MEHUL SEHGAL
VS.
MUKESH SEHGAL AND ANR.
23.08.2024
Fresh suit has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered as per law.
At 03.30 pm
Present : None.
Put up for appearance of the plaintiff on 11.09.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --