Skip to main content
CS (COMM.) - CIVIL SUIT (COMMERCIAL)

Vijay MittalVsRAJESH KUMAR SHARMA

CNR DLNW010074812025761-District Judge (Commercial) - 02
Rohini North-West, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
525/2025
Registration Date
15 Jul 2025
Next Hearing Date
14 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Issues

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Vijay Mittal

    Respondent

    1. 1RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Recovery of Money · Sec RECOVERY

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-07-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2025

Date: 21-07-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2025

Date: 13-11-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Issues
Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2026

Date: 05-02-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: for Case Management Hearing
Next Hearing Date: 28-03-2026

Date: 28-03-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: for Case Management Hearing
Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2026

Date: 08-05-2026
Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave
Next Purpose: for Case Management Hearing
Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2026

Date: 13-07-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Consideration
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2026

Date: 09-10-2026
Business: issues  and case management
Next Purpose: Issues
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 4493/2025
Filing Date: 14-07-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20230014281C202500014
eFiling Date: 12-07-2025
First Hearing Date: 15th July 2025
Court Number And Judge: 761-District Judge (Commercial) - 02

    Orders

    10
    Interim Order 5
    09 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 26 CS (COMM.) 525/2025
VIJAY MITTAL VS. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
09.10.2026
Present : Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant despite repeated calls.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that defendant has not filed
the written statement to the amended plaint so far despite directions to
file the same within four weeks.
At this stage, Sh. M.K. Jha, Ld. counsel for defendant
namely Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma has appeared through V.C.
Admittedly, the written statement to amended plaint not
filed. No explanation given. Ld. counsel for defendant seeks one week’s
time for filing the same.
In the interest of justice, the same be filed within one week
from today failing which the opportunity shall be deemed to be closed.
The spare copy for other party be placed on record.
Now put up for framing of issues and case management
hearing on 12.01.2027.
On request date changed to 14.01.2027.
(Manish Gupta)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/Delhi/09.10.2026
m
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    13 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
13.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. M.K. Jha, Ld. counsel for defendant through VC.
No reply to the amendment application is sought to be filed by the
defendant.
I have heard Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
The amendment in para No.4 of the plaint is sought to be done by
incorporating the correct figures with regard to the outstanding balance.
The application being formal in nature stands allowed.
The amended plaint along with an application is taken on record.
Let amended WS, if any, in the matter be filed within four weeks
from today with advance copy to the other side.
List for further consideration on 09.10.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/13.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    05 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manoj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
An application u/o 6, Rule 17 CPC has been filed by the plaintiff.
Copy supplied. Let reply, if any, be filed within four weeks from today.
List for arguments on this application/issues/case management
hearing on 28.03.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/05.02.2026
At this stage, Sh. Manoj Kr. Jha and Ms. Dipti Kumari, Advocates on
behalf of defendant have appeared in court who has been apprised of the order
passed in the matter.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    13 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
13.11.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Deepti Kumari, Ld. counsel for defendant.
The WS in the matter has been filed. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any, be filed within four weeks from today
with advance copy to the opposite counsel.
List for issues/case management hearing on 05.02.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/13.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    21 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
21.07.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Issue summons in the matter against defendant on filing of
PF/RC, through all permissible modes, returnable for 13.11.2025. Steps be
taken within 15 days.
E-summons be also issued in the matter against defendant on
filing of e-mail address of the defendant with PDF of the entire case file.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/21.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    09 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 26 CS (COMM.) 525/2025
VIJAY MITTAL VS. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
09.10.2026
Present : Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant despite repeated calls.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that defendant has not filed
the written statement to the amended plaint so far despite directions to
file the same within four weeks.
At this stage, Sh. M.K. Jha, Ld. counsel for defendant
namely Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma has appeared through V.C.
Admittedly, the written statement to amended plaint not
filed. No explanation given. Ld. counsel for defendant seeks one week’s
time for filing the same.
In the interest of justice, the same be filed within one week
from today failing which the opportunity shall be deemed to be closed.
The spare copy for other party be placed on record.
Now put up for framing of issues and case management
hearing on 12.01.2027.
On request date changed to 14.01.2027.
(Manish Gupta)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/Delhi/09.10.2026
m
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    13 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
13.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. M.K. Jha, Ld. counsel for defendant through VC.
No reply to the amendment application is sought to be filed by the
defendant.
I have heard Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
The amendment in para No.4 of the plaint is sought to be done by
incorporating the correct figures with regard to the outstanding balance.
The application being formal in nature stands allowed.
The amended plaint along with an application is taken on record.
Let amended WS, if any, in the matter be filed within four weeks
from today with advance copy to the other side.
List for further consideration on 09.10.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/13.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    05 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manoj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
An application u/o 6, Rule 17 CPC has been filed by the plaintiff.
Copy supplied. Let reply, if any, be filed within four weeks from today.
List for arguments on this application/issues/case management
hearing on 28.03.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/05.02.2026
At this stage, Sh. Manoj Kr. Jha and Ms. Dipti Kumari, Advocates on
behalf of defendant have appeared in court who has been apprised of the order
passed in the matter.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    13 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
13.11.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Deepti Kumari, Ld. counsel for defendant.
The WS in the matter has been filed. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any, be filed within four weeks from today
with advance copy to the opposite counsel.
List for issues/case management hearing on 05.02.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/13.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    21 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM.) 525/25
Vijay Mittal Vs. Rajesh Kumar sharma
21.07.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Issue summons in the matter against defendant on filing of
PF/RC, through all permissible modes, returnable for 13.11.2025. Steps be
taken within 15 days.
E-summons be also issued in the matter against defendant on
filing of e-mail address of the defendant with PDF of the entire case file.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/21.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.