JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANRVsRAJAT CHAUDHARY +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
10/07/2026
Present: Sh. Harshit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Digvijay Singh,, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Amended memo of parties filed by the counsel for
plaintiff.
It is submitted by the counsel for defendant that he has
filed the amended WS on 04.02.2026, however, the same is not
traceable on record. Ahlmad to filed the report in this regard.
It is submitted by the counsel for plaintiff that his
replication filed earlier be considered as replication to the amended
WS.
Court fees of Rs. 26,150/- on behalf of plaintiff already
on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.09.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/10/07/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
13.12.2025
Present: Sh. Harshit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Digvijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Heard arguments on application under Order 6 Rule 17
CPC. Perused the entire application.
By virtue of the present application, the plaintiff has
sought correct in valuation clause, cause of action clause and has
filed the POA executed by the plaintiff in favour of Vipin Kapoor.
The plaintiff has further sought recovery of rent of Rs.24,30,000/-.
The amendment application is allowed. The plaintiff is
directed to file the deficient court fees. Amended plaint taken on
record. Plaintiff to file the proper amended memo of parties on or
before NDOH.
Let amended WS be filed within stipulated period with
advance copy to other party.
Put up for filing of replication and settlement of issues
on 08.04.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/13.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 35 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
28.11.2025
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs.
Sh. Digvijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Reply to the application of plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule
17 CPC on behalf of defendant filed. Copy supplied.
Heard arguments on the said application behalf of ld.
Counsel for plaintiffs.
Put up for arguments on behalf of defendant on the said
application on 13.12.2025.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/28.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
06.11.2025
Lawyers are abstaining work from today.
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
It is submitted by counsel for plaintiff that matter is fixed
for consideration on the application filed by plaintiff under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC.
Put up for appearance of defendant and arguments on the
said application on 28.11.2025.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
18.09.2025
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta and Sh. Mukul Pratap Singh, Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed amendment
application alongwith amended plaint and POA. There is some
dispute between the parties about supply of advance copy. Today,
again Ld. counsel for plaintiff has again supplied the copy. Reply,
if any, may be filed.
List for arguments on 25.11.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/18.09.2025
Later, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff again appeared and
requested that the date may changed to 06.11.2025 and that he
had already talked to the opposite counsel in this respect. On his
submission, the file be firstly listed on 06.11.2025 for
consideration and for arguments.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/18.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
19.07.2025
Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Arguments heard.
Defendants are raising procedural objection in respect
of power of attorney, verification of plaint and cause of action
paragraph. I am satisfied that the objections are genuine but
rejection of plaint cannot be permissible. Therefore, plaintiff is
given time to make all necessary corrections by moving
appropriate application and also to rectify the mistake in respect
of power of attorney.
Matter be adjourned.
List for further proceedings on 14.08.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/19.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
12.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Proxy counsel for defendant is present in person and has
handed over one application under Order 17 Rule 1 CPC for
adjournment.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, matter is
adjourned.
List for argument on 19.07.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/12.07.2025
Later on, proxy counsel for the plaintiff has appeared and
filed reply to the application under Section 151 CPC. Same is taken
on record.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/12.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IA 1/2025
in case titled as Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr.
Vs.
Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
31.05.2025
Present: Sh. Nakul Khanna and Sh. Mukul Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Notice was issued in respect of the application but the
same has not been received back. Let again a notice be issued to the
respondent to be served in dasti mode for 09.06.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IA No. 1/2025
in case titled as Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr.
Vs.
Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
06.05.2025
New application filed.
Present: Ld. counsel for the applicant.
This application for early hearing has been filed in online
mode.
Let notice be issued to the counsel for respondent on
filing of necessary PF on 31.05.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
06.03.2025
Present: Plaintiff no.1 with Ld. Counsel.
Ld. counsel for defendants (through VC).
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that only on
03.03.2025 complete copy of plaint and documents have been
supplied by the plaintiff and therefore he seeks time to file WS. 30
days time is granted to file WS with advance copy to the plaintiff.
Plaintiff may file replication thereafter.
List for further proceedings on 04.09.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr. Vs. Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
04.11.2024
Present: Counsel for plaintiff.
File has been listed today in terms of the directions
passed in Misc. DJ No. 1363/24.
Heard.
Ld. counsel submits that the deficiency regarding SPA
has already been cleared.
Let summons for settlement of issues be sent to the
defendant on filing of necessary PF/RC for 06.03.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/04.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT
CHAUDHARY
03.10.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
It appears that court fee has been filed but requirement
of Section 18 of the Stamp Act has not been complied with. Let
the plaintiff side to properly comply with the requirement in
respect of the power of attorney so that the suit can proceed.
Otherwise, we will have to impound the power of attorney.
List for further proceedings on 06.03.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/03.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
10/07/2026
Present: Sh. Harshit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Digvijay Singh,, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Amended memo of parties filed by the counsel for
plaintiff.
It is submitted by the counsel for defendant that he has
filed the amended WS on 04.02.2026, however, the same is not
traceable on record. Ahlmad to filed the report in this regard.
It is submitted by the counsel for plaintiff that his
replication filed earlier be considered as replication to the amended
WS.
Court fees of Rs. 26,150/- on behalf of plaintiff already
on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.09.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/10/07/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
13.12.2025
Present: Sh. Harshit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Digvijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Heard arguments on application under Order 6 Rule 17
CPC. Perused the entire application.
By virtue of the present application, the plaintiff has
sought correct in valuation clause, cause of action clause and has
filed the POA executed by the plaintiff in favour of Vipin Kapoor.
The plaintiff has further sought recovery of rent of Rs.24,30,000/-.
The amendment application is allowed. The plaintiff is
directed to file the deficient court fees. Amended plaint taken on
record. Plaintiff to file the proper amended memo of parties on or
before NDOH.
Let amended WS be filed within stipulated period with
advance copy to other party.
Put up for filing of replication and settlement of issues
on 08.04.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/13.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 35 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
28.11.2025
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs.
Sh. Digvijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Reply to the application of plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule
17 CPC on behalf of defendant filed. Copy supplied.
Heard arguments on the said application behalf of ld.
Counsel for plaintiffs.
Put up for arguments on behalf of defendant on the said
application on 13.12.2025.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/28.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
06.11.2025
Lawyers are abstaining work from today.
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
It is submitted by counsel for plaintiff that matter is fixed
for consideration on the application filed by plaintiff under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC.
Put up for appearance of defendant and arguments on the
said application on 28.11.2025.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
18.09.2025
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta and Sh. Mukul Pratap Singh, Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed amendment
application alongwith amended plaint and POA. There is some
dispute between the parties about supply of advance copy. Today,
again Ld. counsel for plaintiff has again supplied the copy. Reply,
if any, may be filed.
List for arguments on 25.11.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/18.09.2025
Later, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff again appeared and
requested that the date may changed to 06.11.2025 and that he
had already talked to the opposite counsel in this respect. On his
submission, the file be firstly listed on 06.11.2025 for
consideration and for arguments.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/18.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
19.07.2025
Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Arguments heard.
Defendants are raising procedural objection in respect
of power of attorney, verification of plaint and cause of action
paragraph. I am satisfied that the objections are genuine but
rejection of plaint cannot be permissible. Therefore, plaintiff is
given time to make all necessary corrections by moving
appropriate application and also to rectify the mistake in respect
of power of attorney.
Matter be adjourned.
List for further proceedings on 14.08.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/19.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
12.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Proxy counsel for defendant is present in person and has
handed over one application under Order 17 Rule 1 CPC for
adjournment.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, matter is
adjourned.
List for argument on 19.07.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/12.07.2025
Later on, proxy counsel for the plaintiff has appeared and
filed reply to the application under Section 151 CPC. Same is taken
on record.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/12.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IA 1/2025
in case titled as Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr.
Vs.
Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
31.05.2025
Present: Sh. Nakul Khanna and Sh. Mukul Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Notice was issued in respect of the application but the
same has not been received back. Let again a notice be issued to the
respondent to be served in dasti mode for 09.06.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IA No. 1/2025
in case titled as Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr.
Vs.
Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
06.05.2025
New application filed.
Present: Ld. counsel for the applicant.
This application for early hearing has been filed in online
mode.
Let notice be issued to the counsel for respondent on
filing of necessary PF on 31.05.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR Vs. RAJAT CHAUDHARY
06.03.2025
Present: Plaintiff no.1 with Ld. Counsel.
Ld. counsel for defendants (through VC).
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that only on
03.03.2025 complete copy of plaint and documents have been
supplied by the plaintiff and therefore he seeks time to file WS. 30
days time is granted to file WS with advance copy to the plaintiff.
Plaintiff may file replication thereafter.
List for further proceedings on 04.09.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
Jyotsna Nijhawan & Anr. Vs. Rajat Chaudhary & Anr.
04.11.2024
Present: Counsel for plaintiff.
File has been listed today in terms of the directions
passed in Misc. DJ No. 1363/24.
Heard.
Ld. counsel submits that the deficiency regarding SPA
has already been cleared.
Let summons for settlement of issues be sent to the
defendant on filing of necessary PF/RC for 06.03.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/04.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 709/24
JYOTSNA NIJHAWAN AND ANR VS. RAJAT
CHAUDHARY
03.10.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
It appears that court fee has been filed but requirement
of Section 18 of the Stamp Act has not been complied with. Let
the plaintiff side to properly comply with the requirement in
respect of the power of attorney so that the suit can proceed.
Otherwise, we will have to impound the power of attorney.
List for further proceedings on 06.03.2025.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/03.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --