Full Order Text
Interim Order 9 · 27 Mar 2026 · CNR DLNW010068192025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: -1- 15 CA / 166/2025 AMRIT KAUR VS. JAGJIT SINGH SAINI AND ORS PS 27.03.2026 Present : Mr. J.S. Malik, Ld. Substitute Addl. P.P. for the State. Appellant is present through V.C. Respondent no.1 is present in person. Ms. Aastha Vashist, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 through V.C. Mr. Vikas Rohtagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 and 3. Mr. Ravinder Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 i.e. Punjab and Sind Bank through V.C. 1. The appellant has joined the proceedings through V.C. while being in a car. Upon Court’s questioning her regarding the manner of appearing through V.C., she submits that she could not appear physically before this Court today on account of the fact that she is on the way for taking medical treatment. 2. Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.4 bank submits that the said bank has been unnecessarily impleaded in the present appeal and that the same may be deleted. 3. The present appeal has arisen out of the proceedings under Domestic Violence Act between the appellant and her husband and in- laws. Therefore, the respondent no.4 is being exempted from appearing physically or virtually before this Court until it is specifically ordered to appear in person or through V.C. 4. The appellant submits that this Court is biased against her and, therefore, the matter may be transferred to other Court. 5. This Court does not have any power to transfer the matter pending before it to another Court and, therefore, the request of appellant is declined. 6. At this, the appellant submits that the matter may be passed over till 02:00 PM so that she could appear before this Court physically. 7. Be awaited. The Court would go through the judicial record -- 1 of 2 -- -2- and would consider to pass an appropriate Order upon this appeal, which may be inquired by the parties in the evening. (Sachin Mittal) ASJ-05/North-West District Rohini Courts/Delhi/27.03.2026 AT 11:35 AM Present : Mr. J.S. Malik, Ld. Substitute Addl. P.P. for the State. Appellant is present in person. 1. At this time, the appellant has appeared in person and she has filed an application seeking adjournment. She has reiterated her allegation of this Court being biased. She also submits that she would file an application for transfer of present matter to some other Court. 2. Though, this Court does not have any reason for being biased against appellant, in the interest of justice, the matter is being adjourned for appellant to prosecute her application, if any, for transfer of the present matter to some other Court. 3. Be put up on 04.06.2026. (Sachin Mittal) ASJ-05/North-West District Rohini Courts/Delhi/27.03.2026 -- 2 of 2 --