Nitesh GuptaVsNEHA GUPTA

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CA No. 164/2025
Nitesh Gupta Vs. Neha Gupta
PS AMAN VIHAR
20.07.2026
Present : Ms. Geeta Bansiwal, Ld. Addl. P.P. for the State.
Sh. Mohit Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Sh. Kapil Jain, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits
that he shall address the arguments straightway without filing any
reply.
Part arguments from the sides have been heard.
Be put up for concluding arguments on 15.10.2026.
(Sachin Mittal)
ASJ-05, District North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
20.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CA No. 164/2025
Nitesh Gupta Vs. Neha Gupta
PS AMAN VIHAR
02.02.2026
Present : Ms. Geeta Bansiwal, Ld. Addl. P.P. for the State.
Ms. Rut Panwar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for appellant
alongwith appellant.
Sh. Kapil Jain, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Adjournment is sought by the appellant by stating that
the main counsel is not available today. On query, Ld. Proxy
counsel failed to apprise the court as to why the main counsel is
not available today while the matter was fixed for arguments on
appeal today.
Cost of Rs.2,000/- is imposed upon the appellant to
adduce arguments.
Be listed for arguments on appeal on 20.04.2026.
(Rajinder Kumar)
ASJ-05/North-West District
Rohini Courts/Delhi/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CA No. 164/2025
Nitesh Gupta Vs. Neha Gupta
PS AMAN VIHAR
15.10.2026
Regular Addl. PP for State is on leave today.
Present : Sh. Ravi Kumar, Ld. Subst. Addl. P.P. for the State.
Sh. Mohit Aggarwal alongwith Sh. Deepak Chillar, Ld.
Counsels for appellant.
Sh. Kapil Jain, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
1. Part submissions from both the sides, heard.
2. Ld. Counsel for the respondent has drawn attention of
the Court towards several entries of the deposit/withdrawal of
cash in/from the bank account of the appellant.
3. It has been submitted from both the sides that several
facts and documents were not considered by the Ld. Trial Court
while passing the impugned Order.
4. In view of the above, both the parties are directed to
file brief written synopsis therein stating respective submissions
for/against the impugned Order.
5. Trial Court Record be sent back to Ld. Trial Court and
be requisitioned two days prior to the NDOH. It is made clear
that there is no stay upon the operation of the impugned Order.
6. Be put up on 18.02.2027.
(Sachin Mittal)
ASJ-03, District North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
15.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CA No. 164/2025
Nitesh Gupta Vs. Neha Gupta
PS AMAN VIHAR
20.07.2026
Present : Ms. Geeta Bansiwal, Ld. Addl. P.P. for the State.
Sh. Mohit Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Sh. Kapil Jain, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits
that he shall address the arguments straightway without filing any
reply.
Part arguments from the sides have been heard.
Be put up for concluding arguments on 15.10.2026.
(Sachin Mittal)
ASJ-05, District North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
20.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CA No. 164/2025
Nitesh Gupta Vs. Neha Gupta
PS AMAN VIHAR
02.02.2026
Present : Ms. Geeta Bansiwal, Ld. Addl. P.P. for the State.
Ms. Rut Panwar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for appellant
alongwith appellant.
Sh. Kapil Jain, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Adjournment is sought by the appellant by stating that
the main counsel is not available today. On query, Ld. Proxy
counsel failed to apprise the court as to why the main counsel is
not available today while the matter was fixed for arguments on
appeal today.
Cost of Rs.2,000/- is imposed upon the appellant to
adduce arguments.
Be listed for arguments on appeal on 20.04.2026.
(Rajinder Kumar)
ASJ-05/North-West District
Rohini Courts/Delhi/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --