Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 4

CNR DLNW01005365202402 Mar 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 4 · 02 Mar 2026 · CNR DLNW010053652024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM.) 370/24
Chandra Laxmi hospitals Pvt. ltd Vs. HETERO HEALTHCARE
PVT LTD
14.03.2026
File taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared
holiday vide order No.64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026 of
the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
Present: Ms. Namrata Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh.Chirag Ahluwalia, Ld. Counsel for defendant
through video conferencing.
Arguments on the application under order VIII Rule
1 read with Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay in filing
the written statement are heard.
Record perused.
Ld.counsel for plaintiff is having ‘no objection’ in
case the present application is allowed.
Ld.counsel for defendant is seeking condonation of
delay of 9 days in filing the written statement. It is stated that the
Ld.counsel for defendant has gone through the various old
records for preparing written statement and the said exercise
inadvertently led to delay in filing the written statement. It is
prayed that the delay in filing the written statement may kindly
be condoned.
There is no inordinate delay in filing the written
statement. The written statement is filed nine days beyond the
limitation period of 30 days but within the outer limit.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
application under order VIII Rule 1 CPC(amended by
Commercial Courts Act) is allowed and written statement is
taken on record.
-- 1 of 2 --
2.
6 CS (COMM.) 370/24
Chandra Laxmi hospitals Pvt. ltd Vs. HETERO HEALTHCARE PVT
LTD
Rejoinder to the written statement, alongwith
affidavit of addmission/denial of documents of defendant and
proof of service on behalf of plaintiff filed.
An application under Section 151 CPC to place on
record the notarized affidavit and statement of truth on behalf of
plaintiff moved.
Reply to the application under order VII Rule 11
CPC on behalf of plaintiff also filed.
It is submitted by Ld.counsel for plaintiff that the
copy of rejoinder and application, reply to the application under
order VII Rule 11 CPC has already been supplied, but in view of
objection raised by Ld.counsel for defenant, she has no objection
to serve the copy afresh.
Be put up for arguments on the application under
order VII Rule 11 CPC and reply and arguments on the
application under Section 151 CPC on 14.05.2026.
( Devender Kumar Jangala )
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
North-West, Rohini, Delhi.
14.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.