Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 40

CNR DLNW01004682202417 Apr 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 40 · 17 Apr 2025 · CNR DLNW010046822024

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. VIRENDER KUMAR BANSAL
PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
NORTH-WEST DISTRICT: ROHINI COURTS: DELHI
CNR No. DLNW01-004682-2024
SC No. 398-24
State v. Prabhjot @ Sahib & Ors.
FIR No. 125/24
PS Keshav Puram
u/s. 392/397/411/34 IPC
(Bail application of applicant/accused Karan Dutta)
17.04.2025
File is taken up today on an application for bail u/s.483
BNSS moved on behalf of applicant/accused Karan Dutta s/o Govind
Dutta.
Present: Sh. G.S. Guraya, Ld. Chief PP for State.
Sh. Pankaj Tomar, Sh. Naveen Kishore, and Sh.
Himanshu Shrama, Advs. for applicant/accused.
IO/SI Mukul Yadav is present and filed the reply.
Heard the arguments on bail application.
(Bail Order)
Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused submitted that
applicant/accused is in custody since 26.07.2024. Challan has already
been filed after investigation. More than eight months passed. He has
been falsely implicated. It is submitted that his co-accused have
already been granted bail.
2. Ld. Chief PP opposed the bail application and submitted
that in the present case, the complainant has already been examined,
who has identified the accused and also explained the role played by
him. It is prayed that keeping in view the gravity of offence that they
robbed the complainant of Rs.25 Lakhs on pistol point, he may
Page 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
threaten the witnesses if released on bail. It is prayed that the
application be dismissed.
3. I have gone through the record.
4. Keeping in view the submissions, the fact that more than
eight months have passed since his arrest and that his co-accused have
already been granted bail, it is ordered that applicant/accused Karan
Dutta s/o Govind Dutta be released on bail on his furnishing personal
bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety in the like amount, on
the following conditions:
i) That the applicant/accused will supply his mobile number(s) to the
IO of the case, which should be always working and he shall share
his phone live location as and when required by the IO.
ii) That the applicant/accused shall not visit the vicinity in which the
offence took place and that he shall not create any kind of
impediment in the trial.
iii) That the applicant/accused shall not try to contact or influence
the witnesses directly or indirectly.
iv) That, in case, it is prima facie brought to the notice of the Court
that the applicant/accused is violating the abovesaid conditions, the
bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.
5. List on the date already fixed i.e. 05.05.2025 for PE. Copy
of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent, for
information and compliance. Copy of the order be also given dasti.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge (NW)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.04.2025/sb
Page 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.