JAGAT SINGH KHARIVsMAHINDER KHARI AND ORS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 45 CONTEMPT PETITION
CIV. 10/23 JAGAT SINGH KHARI VS. MAHINDER KHARI
AND ORS
03.12.2025
Present: Sh. Ritesh Saxena, Ld. counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sahil Malik, Ld. counsel for defendants no.1 and 2.
None for D-3/ MCD.
Put up for PE with connected matter on 03.03.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 45 CONTEMPT PETITION
CIV. 10/23 JAGAT SINGH KHARI VS. MAHINDER KHARI
AND ORS
03.12.2025
Present: Sh. Ritesh Saxena, Ld. counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sahil Malik, Ld. counsel for defendants no.1 and 2.
None for D-3/ MCD.
Put up for PE with connected matter on 03.03.2026.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
DJ-02, N/W, ROHINI COURTS
DELHI/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 694/22
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI
Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
05.11.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the defendant (through VC).
SHO of PS Ashok Vihar in person.
These are two matters.
A notice was issued for personal appearance of SHO
but the same has been returned to the court on the ground that no
complaint was attached to such notice. I think this is completely
improper on the part of the Police Station.
SHO regrets that his V-B Incharge has unnecessarily
return the notice and he assures that he will take corrective
meaures. The court expects that whenever any notice is sent to
the Police Station, the staff therein shall accept the same and then
file a report by mentioning that whatever they want to say and
shall not return the notice to the court.
SHO shall see that no person encroaches upon the
public land pertaining to the suit property.
Ld. counsel for defendant seeks time to argue the
matter.
List for arguments on 30.11.2024 at 2:00 pm.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/05.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 694/22
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI
Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
05.11.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the defendant (through VC).
SHO of PS Ashok Vihar in person.
These are two matters.
A notice was issued for personal appearance of SHO
but the same has been returned to the court on the ground that no
complaint was attached to such notice. I think this is completely
improper on the part of the Police Station.
SHO regrets that his V-B Incharge has unnecessarily
return the notice and he assures that he will take corrective
meaures. The court expects that whenever any notice is sent to
the Police Station, the staff therein shall accept the same and then
file a report by mentioning that whatever they want to say and
shall not return the notice to the court.
SHO shall see that no person encroaches upon the
public land pertaining to the suit property.
Ld. counsel for defendant seeks time to argue the
matter.
List for arguments on 30.11.2024 at 2:00 pm.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/05.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
CS DJ 694/22
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI
31.07.2024
Present: Sh. Sameer Vats, Ld.counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sahil Malik, Sh. Rahul Mann & Sh. Narender
Rana, Ld. counsels for defendants no. 1 & 2.
Ld. counsel for MCD.
These are two matters.
Ld. Counsel for MCD submits that despite several
efforts the defendant is not following the law and that SHO is
also not doing his duties properly.
Let the SHO be called for the next date.
List for further proceedings on 05.11.2024.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/31.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
CS DJ 694/22
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI
31.07.2024
Present: Sh. Sameer Vats, Ld.counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sahil Malik, Sh. Rahul Mann & Sh. Narender
Rana, Ld. counsels for defendants no. 1 & 2.
Ld. counsel for MCD.
These are two matters.
Ld. Counsel for MCD submits that despite several
efforts the defendant is not following the law and that SHO is
also not doing his duties properly.
Let the SHO be called for the next date.
List for further proceedings on 05.11.2024.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts
Delhi/31.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
02.04.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for respondent no.2.
Proxy counsel for the MCD.
Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 has filed reply. Ld.
counsel for petitioner submits that he has already received the
advance copy of the reply.
Ld. counsel for respondent no. 2 is submitting that his
property is WP1A whereas petitioner is claiming rights on WP1
and therefore he cannot maintain any type of contempt case. He
has pointed out the laldora certificate and electricity bill filed
alongwith his reply showing the property no. WP1A. Ld. counsel
for petitioner however submits that both the properties are same
and he will show the documents from the suit file.
List the matter on the date when the main suit be listed
i.e. on 31.07.2024.
In the meantime, the MCD and SHO PS Ashok Vihar
shall ensure that there is no encroachment on the public land by
the respondents so far as the area around the suit property is
concerned.
Copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. counsel for the
MCD.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts,
Delhi/02.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Contempt Petition Civ. 10/23
JAGAT SINGH KHARI Vs. MAHINDER KHARI AND ORS
02.04.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for respondent no.2.
Proxy counsel for the MCD.
Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 has filed reply. Ld.
counsel for petitioner submits that he has already received the
advance copy of the reply.
Ld. counsel for respondent no. 2 is submitting that his
property is WP1A whereas petitioner is claiming rights on WP1
and therefore he cannot maintain any type of contempt case. He
has pointed out the laldora certificate and electricity bill filed
alongwith his reply showing the property no. WP1A. Ld. counsel
for petitioner however submits that both the properties are same
and he will show the documents from the suit file.
List the matter on the date when the main suit be listed
i.e. on 31.07.2024.
In the meantime, the MCD and SHO PS Ashok Vihar
shall ensure that there is no encroachment on the public land by
the respondents so far as the area around the suit property is
concerned.
Copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. counsel for the
MCD.
(Rakesh Kumar Singh)
ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts,
Delhi/02.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --