CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
Kavita HassaniVsPrakash Kukreja +2 more
CNR DLNW010035142024503-District Judge (North-West)
Rohini North-West, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 351/2024
- Registration Date
- 16 Apr 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 28 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Petitioner
Acts & Sections
1Civil Cases · Sec SUIT
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 16-04-2024 Business: consideration Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 17-05-2024 Date: 17-05-2024 Business: service Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2024 Date: 24-08-2024 Business: same purpose Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2025 Date: 21-01-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2025 Date: 05-08-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2026 Date: 17-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2026 Date: 16-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2026 Date: 17-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2026 Date: 27-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2026 Date: 04-08-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2026 Date: 13-08-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1796/2024 Filing Date: 15-04-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230015755C202400237 eFiling Date: 12-04-2024 First Hearing Date: 16th April 2024 Court Number And Judge: 503-District Judge (North-West)
Orders
16Interim Order 804 Aug 2026
04 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 04.08.2026 Present: Sh. Ashutosh K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, counsel for defendants. Matter received back from mediation cell as unsettled. It is submitted that matter is still likely to be compromised. Put up for appearance of parties on 13.08.2026 at 11:30 am. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/04.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 727 Apr 2026
27 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 27.04.2026 Present: Counsels for the parties. At this stage, it is submitted that the matter is likely to be compromised and request is made for referring the matter to mediation cell. Parties shall appear before Ld. Mediator on 05.05.2026 at 12:30 pm and to come up for report before this court on 04.08.2026. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/27.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 616 Apr 2026
16 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja & Anr. 16.04.2026 File taken up today on the application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by counsel for plaintiff. Present: Sh. Ashutosh K. Misrha, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma counsel for defendants through VC Copy of the application served upon the counsel for defendants through whatsapp. At request of counsel for defendant, put up for arguments on the application on 17.04.2026 at 11:30 am. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/16.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 517 Jan 2026
17 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 17.01.2026 Present: Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties and other material available on record, following issues are settled: 1. Whether the plaintiff has concealed material facts and suit is without any cause of action? OPD 2. Whether the plaintiff has not valued the suit properly for the purposes of court fees and jurisdiction? OPD 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for preliminary decree of partition as prayed for? OPP 4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of mandatory injunction as prayed for? OPP. 5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of permanent injunction as prayed for? OPP. 6. Relief. No other issue either arises or has been pressed for. Let list of witnesses alongwith affidavit of the witnesses sought to be examined by both the parties be filed within 15 days from today with advance copy to each other. Put up for PE on 27.04.2026. Interim order, if any, to continue. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/17.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 421 Jan 2025
21 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 21.01.2025 Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, Ld. counsel for defendants. Proxy counsel for plaintiff has filed an affidavit of Advocate Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra indicating that list of documents was wrongly submitted in this suit. Copy of affidavit supplied to the opposite side. 30 days time is given to the defendant to file WS with advance copy to the plaintiff. List for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents and for framing of issues on 05.08.2025. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/21.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 324 Aug 2024
24 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 24.08.2024 Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Ld. counsel for defendants. Ld. counsel for defendant has filed vakalatnama and submits that the supplied copies are deficient. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that the documents mentioned in the list dated 10.05.2024 could not be filed by the plaintiff though the list of document was prepared for the purpose of filing in the court. Let the plaintiff to file an affidavit in this respect as to what document she has filed in the court and what she has not filed. This affidavit be filed within a period of one week with advance copy to the opposite side. Defendant shall have 30 days time to file WS. Parties shall not create third party rights in the property till further orders. List for further proceedings on 21.01.2025. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 217 May 2024
17 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 KAVITA HASSANI VS. PRAKASH KUKREJA 17.05.2024 Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Amended plaint is taken on record. However, still court fee has not been filed. If the plaintiff files court fee within a period of one month and furnishes necessary PF, summons for settlement of issues be sent to the defendants by all available modes for 24.08.2024. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 116 Apr 2024
16 Apr 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 16.04.2024 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Sunil Kumar, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Record perused. There are several problems with the plaint. Memo of parties does not bear any date. Even the plaint does not bear any date. The verification of plaint is undated. Interim injunction application does not have any court fee and also does not have any date. Even list of documents does not have any date. Apart from this paragraph 15 of the plaint does not clearly provides the details of court fee. All these things need to be rectified by the plaintiff by filing a proper amended plaint and also by providing court fee on the plaint and interim injunction application. This may be done within a month. List for consideration on 17.05.2024. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts, Delhi/16.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 804 Aug 2026
04 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 04.08.2026 Present: Sh. Ashutosh K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, counsel for defendants. Matter received back from mediation cell as unsettled. It is submitted that matter is still likely to be compromised. Put up for appearance of parties on 13.08.2026 at 11:30 am. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/04.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 727 Apr 2026
27 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 27.04.2026 Present: Counsels for the parties. At this stage, it is submitted that the matter is likely to be compromised and request is made for referring the matter to mediation cell. Parties shall appear before Ld. Mediator on 05.05.2026 at 12:30 pm and to come up for report before this court on 04.08.2026. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/27.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 616 Apr 2026
16 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja & Anr. 16.04.2026 File taken up today on the application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by counsel for plaintiff. Present: Sh. Ashutosh K. Misrha, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma counsel for defendants through VC Copy of the application served upon the counsel for defendants through whatsapp. At request of counsel for defendant, put up for arguments on the application on 17.04.2026 at 11:30 am. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/16.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 517 Jan 2026
17 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 17.01.2026 Present: Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties and other material available on record, following issues are settled: 1. Whether the plaintiff has concealed material facts and suit is without any cause of action? OPD 2. Whether the plaintiff has not valued the suit properly for the purposes of court fees and jurisdiction? OPD 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for preliminary decree of partition as prayed for? OPP 4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of mandatory injunction as prayed for? OPP. 5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of permanent injunction as prayed for? OPP. 6. Relief. No other issue either arises or has been pressed for. Let list of witnesses alongwith affidavit of the witnesses sought to be examined by both the parties be filed within 15 days from today with advance copy to each other. Put up for PE on 27.04.2026. Interim order, if any, to continue. (KIRAN GUPTA) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/17.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 421 Jan 2025
21 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 21.01.2025 Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Pawan Kumar Verma, Ld. counsel for defendants. Proxy counsel for plaintiff has filed an affidavit of Advocate Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra indicating that list of documents was wrongly submitted in this suit. Copy of affidavit supplied to the opposite side. 30 days time is given to the defendant to file WS with advance copy to the plaintiff. List for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents and for framing of issues on 05.08.2025. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/21.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 324 Aug 2024
24 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 24.08.2024 Present: Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Ld. counsel for defendants. Ld. counsel for defendant has filed vakalatnama and submits that the supplied copies are deficient. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that the documents mentioned in the list dated 10.05.2024 could not be filed by the plaintiff though the list of document was prepared for the purpose of filing in the court. Let the plaintiff to file an affidavit in this respect as to what document she has filed in the court and what she has not filed. This affidavit be filed within a period of one week with advance copy to the opposite side. Defendant shall have 30 days time to file WS. Parties shall not create third party rights in the property till further orders. List for further proceedings on 21.01.2025. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) DJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts Delhi/24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 217 May 2024
17 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 KAVITA HASSANI VS. PRAKASH KUKREJA 17.05.2024 Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Amended plaint is taken on record. However, still court fee has not been filed. If the plaintiff files court fee within a period of one month and furnishes necessary PF, summons for settlement of issues be sent to the defendants by all available modes for 24.08.2024. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 116 Apr 2024
16 Apr 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 351/24 Kavita Hassani Vs. Prakash Kukreja 16.04.2024 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Sunil Kumar, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Record perused. There are several problems with the plaint. Memo of parties does not bear any date. Even the plaint does not bear any date. The verification of plaint is undated. Interim injunction application does not have any court fee and also does not have any date. Even list of documents does not have any date. Apart from this paragraph 15 of the plaint does not clearly provides the details of court fee. All these things need to be rectified by the plaintiff by filing a proper amended plaint and also by providing court fee on the plaint and interim injunction application. This may be done within a month. List for consideration on 17.05.2024. (Rakesh Kumar Singh) ADJ-02/(N-W), Rohini Courts, Delhi/16.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
