State Bank of IndiaVsSURENDRA SINGH

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 Cs (Comm.) 246/25
State Bank Of India Vs. Surendra Singh
18.11.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Office report perused.
As per report, the defendant was served with the summons on
01.05.2025. The matter has been passed over several times since morning. No
one has appeared on behalf of the defendant. It is already 2.30 P.M. More than
120 days have elapsed from the service upon the defendant.
Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme
Court in ‘MANU/SC/0227/2019’, titled as ‘SCG Contract India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.’, the defence of defendant
stands struck off. The defendant is also accordingly proceeded ex parte.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff does not agree for recording of the
evidence through Ld. LC. Let the list of witnesses be filed by plaintiff within
two weeks.
List for ex parte PE now on 24.03.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/18.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) : 246/2025
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. SURENDRA SINGH
08.04.2025
Fresh suit has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Kunal Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Issue summons in the matter against defendant on filing of
PF/RC, through all permissible modes, returnable for 12.08.2025. Steps be
taken within 15 days.
Summons be also issued through Ld. District & Sessions
Judge concerned.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS (COMM.) 246/25
State Bank of India Vs. SURENDRA SINGH
24.03.2026
Present: Sh. Shivam Dubey, Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant (alreay ex parte and defence also lying struck
off vide order dated 18.11.2025)
The list of witnesses has not been filed by the plaintiff.
In this view of the matter, I permit only AR of plaintiff to be
examined in the matter.
List for ex parte PE now on 14.07.2026.
It is hereby clarified that in case of grant of decree in favour of the
plaintiff, the plaintiff shall not be entitled to the interest for the period from
18.11.2025 till conclusion of the PE.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/24.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 Cs (Comm.) 246/25
State Bank Of India Vs. Surendra Singh
18.11.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Office report perused.
As per report, the defendant was served with the summons on
01.05.2025. The matter has been passed over several times since morning. No
one has appeared on behalf of the defendant. It is already 2.30 P.M. More than
120 days have elapsed from the service upon the defendant.
Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme
Court in ‘MANU/SC/0227/2019’, titled as ‘SCG Contract India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.’, the defence of defendant
stands struck off. The defendant is also accordingly proceeded ex parte.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff does not agree for recording of the
evidence through Ld. LC. Let the list of witnesses be filed by plaintiff within
two weeks.
List for ex parte PE now on 24.03.2026.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/18.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) : 246/2025
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. SURENDRA SINGH
08.04.2025
Fresh suit has been received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Kunal Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Issue summons in the matter against defendant on filing of
PF/RC, through all permissible modes, returnable for 12.08.2025. Steps be
taken within 15 days.
Summons be also issued through Ld. District & Sessions
Judge concerned.
(Vinod Yadav)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
North-West/Rohini Courts/08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --