Order 9

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 32 CS DJ 206/24
Ashok Vohra Vs. Vashi Tayal
24.09.2026
Present: Sh. Atul Rawat, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Akash Srivastav, Ld. counsel for defendant through V.C.
Affidavits of admission/denial of documents have previous been
filed on behalf of plaintiff as well as on behalf of defendant. Parties submit
that there is no document filed by either party which is admitted by the
opposite party. They submit that no purpose would be served by carrying out
admission/denial of documents. They pray that issues may be framed.
The pleadings of the parties are complete.
From the pleadings of the parties, following issues arise for
determination:
(1). Whether the plaintiff has not correctly valued the
suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction
and whether appropriate court fees has not been
paid by the plaintiff?
OPD.
(2). Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
specific performance, as prayed?
OPP.
(3). Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
permanent injunction, as prayed?
OPP.
(4). Relief.
No other issue arises or is pressed.
Both the parties are directed to file list of witnesses within
fifteen days.
-- 1 of 2 --
-: 2 :-
It is stated by Ld. Counsel for both parties that there is no
possibility of settlement in the present matter at this stage.
Put up for PE on 08.04.2027. The plaintiff is directed to supply
advance copy of affidavit of his witnesses to the opposite party at least fifteen
days before next date of hearing.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
24.09.2026
-- 2 of 2 --