Skip to main content
CS (COMM.) - CIVIL SUIT (COMMERCIAL)

YUMMIES FOOD PRODUCTSVsSwastika Enterprises And Anr.

CNR DLNW010017032024761-District Judge (Commercial) - 02
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 29th April 2024

TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
96/2024
Registration Date
20 Feb 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Recovery of Money · Sec RECOVERY

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-02-2024
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2024
    
    Date: 06-03-2024
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2024
    
    Date: 01-04-2024
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2024
    
    Date: 29-04-2024
    Business: DID
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 29-04-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 849/2024
    Filing Date: 19-02-2024
    eFiling Number: ADL20230002107C202400008
    eFiling Date: 19-02-2024
    First Hearing Date: 21st February 2024
    Decision Date: 29th April 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 761-District Judge (Commercial) - 02

    Orders

    7
    Final Order 4
    29 Apr 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 16CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products Vs. Swastika Enterprises And Anr.
    29.04.2024
    Present: None.
    Matter has been called out several times since morning. No
    one has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Even no one had appeared on
    behalf of the plaintiff on the last date of hearing.
    The present suit is hereby dismissed in default.
    File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/29.04.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    01 Apr 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 11CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products Vs. Swastika Enterprises And Anr.
    01.04.2024
    Present: None for plaintiff.
    Matter has been called out several times since morning. No
    one has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. In the interest of justice, today I
    defer passing adverse orders.
    List for further consideration now on 29.04.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/01.04.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    06 Mar 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products Vs. Swastika Enterprises And Anr.
    06.03.2024
    Present: Ms. Poonam Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
    The attention of the Ld. counsel for plaintiff has been drawn
    to the judgments :-
    1. ILR (2016) MP 1795 Civil Revision CR
    No.100/2015 decided on 11.03.2016 in case
    titled as CMD (EZ) MPPKVVCL & Anr. Vs.
    Sharad Oshwal; and
    2. (2023)6 SCC401 Civil Appeal No.8008 of
    2022 in case titled as Gujarat State Civil
    Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mahakali Foods
    Pvt. Ltd. (Unit 2) & Anr.
    The arguing counsel for the plaintiff is stated to be not
    available today.
    In the interest of justice, renotify for further consideration
    now on 01.04.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/06.03.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    21 Feb 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16
    CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products
    Vs.
    Swastika Enterprises And Anr. for Case Management Hearing
    21.02.2024
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked
    and registered.
    Present: Ms. Poonam Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
    The plaintiff is admittedly a MSME (Micro, Small and
    Medium Enterprises).
    Let the plaintiff explain as to why the process of Institutional
    Arbitration as contemplated in MSMED has not been followed in this
    matter and present suit is maintainable.
    Today, the arguing Counsel is stated to be not available.
    Now, to come up for further consideration on 06.03.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/21.02.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    01 Apr 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 11CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products Vs. Swastika Enterprises And Anr.
    01.04.2024
    Present: None for plaintiff.
    Matter has been called out several times since morning. No
    one has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. In the interest of justice, today I
    defer passing adverse orders.
    List for further consideration now on 29.04.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/01.04.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    06 Mar 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products Vs. Swastika Enterprises And Anr.
    06.03.2024
    Present: Ms. Poonam Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
    The attention of the Ld. counsel for plaintiff has been drawn
    to the judgments :-
    1. ILR (2016) MP 1795 Civil Revision CR
    No.100/2015 decided on 11.03.2016 in case
    titled as CMD (EZ) MPPKVVCL & Anr. Vs.
    Sharad Oshwal; and
    2. (2023)6 SCC401 Civil Appeal No.8008 of
    2022 in case titled as Gujarat State Civil
    Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mahakali Foods
    Pvt. Ltd. (Unit 2) & Anr.
    The arguing counsel for the plaintiff is stated to be not
    available today.
    In the interest of justice, renotify for further consideration
    now on 01.04.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/06.03.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    21 Feb 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16
    CS (COMM.)96/24
    Yummies Food Products
    Vs.
    Swastika Enterprises And Anr. for Case Management Hearing
    21.02.2024
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked
    and registered.
    Present: Ms. Poonam Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
    The plaintiff is admittedly a MSME (Micro, Small and
    Medium Enterprises).
    Let the plaintiff explain as to why the process of Institutional
    Arbitration as contemplated in MSMED has not been followed in this
    matter and present suit is maintainable.
    Today, the arguing Counsel is stated to be not available.
    Now, to come up for further consideration on 06.03.2024.
    (Vinod Yadav)
    District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
    North-West/Rohini Courts/21.02.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.