GEETA DEVIVsSATENDER RAUT

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
17.07.2025
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. D.K. Sharma and Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Counsels for
defendants no. 1 and 2.
Ld. counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2 submits that he has not
received copy of replication filed by the plaintiff. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is
directed to provide the same.
List on 19.02.2026.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
17.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
20.03.2025
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. counsel for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. counsel for the defendants no. 1 and 2
with defendant no. 2.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he shall file the
replication during the course of the day with copy to the defendants. Let the
same be done.
Admission/denial affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
However, the plaintiff has furnished the affidavit for his own documents.
Admission/denial not pressed.
Ld. counsel for the defendants submits that as she has not
received the replication right now, issues may be framed on the next date.
Allowed.
Put up for framing of issues for 17.07.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
19.12.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant no. 1
and 2.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Replication not filed even today. Some time sought as the
plaintiff has recently delivered a child and has gone to her native place.
In these circumstances, allowed.
Put up for filing of replication, admission/ denial and
framing of issues on 20.03.2025.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission/ denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/19.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 21
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
19.09.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant no. 1
and 2 with defendants.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Previous cost of Rs. 1000/- paid by the defendants.
Admission/ denial affidavit filed by the defendant along with list of
documents. Copy supplied under receipt.
Replication and admission/ denial affidavit not filed by the
plaintiff as it is stated that she is on her family way and could not appear
in the court for attestation.
In these circumstances, adjournment is allowed.
Put up for filing of replication, admission/ denial and
framing of issues on 19.12.2024.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission/ denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/19.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
21.05.2024
Present : Sh.Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. D.K. Sharma , Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1
and 2 with defendants no. 1 and 2 in person.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
WS on behalf of defendants no. 1 and 2 along with
doucments and vakalatnama filed today. Copy already supplied. Let
list of documents be also filed by the NDOH. However, Ld. Counsel
submtis that the same was supplied only yesterday. Further, the same
is also filed at a belated stage. Same is stated is taken on record
subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/-.
Cost not paid today same be paid positively by the
NDOH.
Put up for replication, admission denial and framing of
issues for 19.09.2024.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/21.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
13.03.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 2 with defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that due to the illness of
his father, he could not supply the copies to the defendant. He submits that
he shall do so within 10 days. Let the same be done under proper receipt.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the defendant no. 1
is the father of the defendant no. 2. The defendant no. 2 may be directed to
supply the address of his father.
When the court has inquired from the defendant no. 2, he
submits that the defendant no. 1 is residing at the same address with him.
Hence, the service upon the defendant no. 1 is deemed to be effected on the
defendant no. 2.
The defendant no. 3 is already served through Whatsapp on
10.07.2023. As he has not appeared, he is proceeded against exparte.
Now, to come up for further proceedings on 21.05.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
13.12.2023
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Neeraj Bairwa, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 2.
None for other defendants.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of Ld. Counsel for the
defendant no. 2.
It is submitted that the plaint is received but the copy of
the documents have not been supplied by the plaintiff. Plaintiff is
directed to supply the same within a week under proper receipt. Upon
this, WS be filed within the statutory period with copy to the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no.1 could not be served
through the court of Ms. Kiran Gupta, Ld. ADJ, Dwarka. He could not
be served through whatsapp as that number is not available on
whatsapp.
Put up for further proceedings for 13.03.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.12.2023
At 12:40 pm.
At this stage, Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has appeared and apprised of NDOH i.e. 13.03.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
29.08.2023
At 2:30 pm.
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to the defendants received back with the
report that the premises were found locked.
Summons issued to the defendant no. 3 have been served
through whatsapp on 10.07.2023.
Ld. Counsel submits that there is connected matter pending
between the parties at Dwarka Courts before the court of Ms. Kiran Gupta,
Ld. ADJ in case titled as Kajal Vs. Kamesh Kumar where the NDOH is
22.09.2023. Hence, on request summons be issued to the defendants
through dasti to be served through the abovementioned court. PF be filed
within three days. Summons be also served upon the defendants through
emode.
Put up for 13.12.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/29.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
22.05.2023
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav , Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with plaintiff no. 1.
None for the defendant.
Summons issued but not received back.
Fresh summons be issued to the defendant in
compliance of the last order on filing of fresh PF within seven
days through dasti as well as e-mode for 29.08.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/22.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
27.02.2023
Present : Sh. M.K. Singh and Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff with plaintiff in person.
Matter was listed for consideration today. An
application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC is filed seeking certain amendments
in the present suit.
It is submitted that the plaintiff inadvertently did not
mention certain facts about the cause of action. Hence, those facts
are sought to be incorporated in the plaint. The matter is at the stage
of consideration. Summons have not been issued yet. Hence, no
prejudice shall be caused to the defendant, if the application is
allowed.
Heard. Perused. Allowed.
Amended plaint is taken on record.
Now, issue summons of the suit for settlement of
issues to the defendant on filing of PF and RC/speed post returnable
on next date of hearing. PF be filed within 15 days from today.
The defendant is directed to file his written statement
within 30 days from the date of service of the summons.
Endorsement be made on the summons accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 22.05.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/27.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS DJ 20/23 GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
26.09.2026
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. D.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 with
defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 has filed an application under
Order 11 Rule 14 read with Section 151 of CPC. Copy is provided to Ld. Counsel
for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he needs time to go through the
application and to file reply to the same.
At his request, put up for filing of reply and for arguments on
27.03.2027.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
26.09.2026
File is taken up again on the appearance of Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that Ld. Counsel for defendant nos.
1 and 2 has provided only copy of application under Order 11 Rule 14 read with
Section 151 of CPC but not documents purportedly attached with the application.
His submissions are recorded. Put up on date fixed.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
17.07.2025
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. D.K. Sharma and Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Counsels for
defendants no. 1 and 2.
Ld. counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2 submits that he has not
received copy of replication filed by the plaintiff. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is
directed to provide the same.
List on 19.02.2026.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
District Judge-III
North-West District,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
17.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
20.03.2025
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. counsel for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. counsel for the defendants no. 1 and 2
with defendant no. 2.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he shall file the
replication during the course of the day with copy to the defendants. Let the
same be done.
Admission/denial affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
However, the plaintiff has furnished the affidavit for his own documents.
Admission/denial not pressed.
Ld. counsel for the defendants submits that as she has not
received the replication right now, issues may be framed on the next date.
Allowed.
Put up for framing of issues for 17.07.2025.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
19.12.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant no. 1
and 2.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Replication not filed even today. Some time sought as the
plaintiff has recently delivered a child and has gone to her native place.
In these circumstances, allowed.
Put up for filing of replication, admission/ denial and
framing of issues on 20.03.2025.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission/ denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/19.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 21
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI Vs. SATENDER RAUT
19.09.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ayman Naaz, Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant no. 1
and 2 with defendants.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
Previous cost of Rs. 1000/- paid by the defendants.
Admission/ denial affidavit filed by the defendant along with list of
documents. Copy supplied under receipt.
Replication and admission/ denial affidavit not filed by the
plaintiff as it is stated that she is on her family way and could not appear
in the court for attestation.
In these circumstances, adjournment is allowed.
Put up for filing of replication, admission/ denial and
framing of issues on 19.12.2024.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission/ denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/19.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ 20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
21.05.2024
Present : Sh.Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. D.K. Sharma , Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1
and 2 with defendants no. 1 and 2 in person.
Defendant no. 3 is exparte.
WS on behalf of defendants no. 1 and 2 along with
doucments and vakalatnama filed today. Copy already supplied. Let
list of documents be also filed by the NDOH. However, Ld. Counsel
submtis that the same was supplied only yesterday. Further, the same
is also filed at a belated stage. Same is stated is taken on record
subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/-.
Cost not paid today same be paid positively by the
NDOH.
Put up for replication, admission denial and framing of
issues for 19.09.2024.
Both the parties are directed to file their affidavits in
admission denial of documents.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
DJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/21.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
13.03.2024
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 2 with defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that due to the illness of
his father, he could not supply the copies to the defendant. He submits that
he shall do so within 10 days. Let the same be done under proper receipt.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the defendant no. 1
is the father of the defendant no. 2. The defendant no. 2 may be directed to
supply the address of his father.
When the court has inquired from the defendant no. 2, he
submits that the defendant no. 1 is residing at the same address with him.
Hence, the service upon the defendant no. 1 is deemed to be effected on the
defendant no. 2.
The defendant no. 3 is already served through Whatsapp on
10.07.2023. As he has not appeared, he is proceeded against exparte.
Now, to come up for further proceedings on 21.05.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
13.12.2023
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Neeraj Bairwa, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 2.
None for other defendants.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of Ld. Counsel for the
defendant no. 2.
It is submitted that the plaint is received but the copy of
the documents have not been supplied by the plaintiff. Plaintiff is
directed to supply the same within a week under proper receipt. Upon
this, WS be filed within the statutory period with copy to the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no.1 could not be served
through the court of Ms. Kiran Gupta, Ld. ADJ, Dwarka. He could not
be served through whatsapp as that number is not available on
whatsapp.
Put up for further proceedings for 13.03.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.12.2023
At 12:40 pm.
At this stage, Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has appeared and apprised of NDOH i.e. 13.03.2024.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/13.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
29.08.2023
At 2:30 pm.
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to the defendants received back with the
report that the premises were found locked.
Summons issued to the defendant no. 3 have been served
through whatsapp on 10.07.2023.
Ld. Counsel submits that there is connected matter pending
between the parties at Dwarka Courts before the court of Ms. Kiran Gupta,
Ld. ADJ in case titled as Kajal Vs. Kamesh Kumar where the NDOH is
22.09.2023. Hence, on request summons be issued to the defendants
through dasti to be served through the abovementioned court. PF be filed
within three days. Summons be also served upon the defendants through
emode.
Put up for 13.12.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/29.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
22.05.2023
Present : Sh. Shailender Yadav , Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with plaintiff no. 1.
None for the defendant.
Summons issued but not received back.
Fresh summons be issued to the defendant in
compliance of the last order on filing of fresh PF within seven
days through dasti as well as e-mode for 29.08.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/22.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS DJ
20/23
GEETA DEVI
Vs.
SATENDER RAUT
27.02.2023
Present : Sh. M.K. Singh and Sh. Shailender Yadav, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff with plaintiff in person.
Matter was listed for consideration today. An
application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC is filed seeking certain amendments
in the present suit.
It is submitted that the plaintiff inadvertently did not
mention certain facts about the cause of action. Hence, those facts
are sought to be incorporated in the plaint. The matter is at the stage
of consideration. Summons have not been issued yet. Hence, no
prejudice shall be caused to the defendant, if the application is
allowed.
Heard. Perused. Allowed.
Amended plaint is taken on record.
Now, issue summons of the suit for settlement of
issues to the defendant on filing of PF and RC/speed post returnable
on next date of hearing. PF be filed within 15 days from today.
The defendant is directed to file his written statement
within 30 days from the date of service of the summons.
Endorsement be made on the summons accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 22.05.2023.
(RUCHIKA SINGLA)
ADJ-03 (N/W)
Rohini Courts :Delhi/27.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --