HOTI LALVsRenu +5 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL VS. RENU
30.04.2026
Present: Ms. Sita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted that document u/s
63BSA of Evidence Act is not brought on record and seeks
adjournment for filing of the same.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff is at liberty to file above
document along with application before NDOH.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to supply copy of
above document to opposite party in advance before NDOH.
Matter be listed for PE on 26.09.2026.
(RAKESH KUMAR V)
DJ-04/North-West
Rohini Courts/Delhi
30.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 16/25 HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
09.12.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave in first half.
Present: Sh. Deepak Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Modgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Evidence affidavit filed through online on
08.12.2025. Hard copy place on record. Copy supplied.
Put up for purpose already fixed for 30.04.2026.
Reader
09.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
03.09.2025
Present: Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
List of witnesses filed on behalf of plaintiff online on
28.05.2025 is reflecting on CIS. In the same, there is no mention
about purpose in respect of witnesses mentioned at serial no. 2
and 3 for which they are to be examined. Affidavit of plaintiff
has been filed online on 02.09.2025 as reflecting on CIS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff stated that witness no. 2 is
son of plaintiff who was running shop which has now been
closed, is relevant witness and is to be examined and she will file
his affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for defendant stated that he wants to
examine both the witnesses simultaneously. Considering the
submissions, matter is adjourned for 09.12.2025 for plaintiff
evidence.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 03.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
06.05.2025
Present: Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication has been filed online on 01.05.2025.
Hard copy is placed on file.
Pleadings are stated to be complete.
Submissions heard on the settlement of issues.
From the submissions and pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed as arises:-
(1) Whether the plaintiff has suffered any damage at
the acts of defendants as alleged ? OPP
(2) If the issue is decided in favour of plaintiff, for
what amount, he is entitled to recover and from which
defendant ? OPP
(3) Relief.
No other issue arises or pressed for. The counsels
appearing for the parties stated that there is no likelihood of the
settlement of matter between the parties at this stage, as such,
there is no use of referring the parties to adopt ADR means. List
of witnesses be filed within 15 days by the parties.
Put up for plaintiff's evidence for 03.09.2025.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 06.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
12.02.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants is filed
with copy of written statement of defendant no. 1 to 6. Written
statement on behalf of defendant no. 1 to 6 as uploaded on
10.02.2025 is reflecting on CIS.
It is stated by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that some
additional documents have been filed online on 11.02.2025.
Same is not reflecting on CIS. Hard copy is placed on file. Copy
supplied.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file
replication.
As prayed, put up on 06.05.2025 for filing of
replication, completion of pleadings and settlement of issues.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 12.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 41
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
07.01.2025
Fresh suit filed online is received by way of assignment. The
copy of plaint received on Internet be checked and matter be
registered as per rules.
Present : Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld counsel for plaintiff.
Hard copy with requisite court fees is placed on file.
Submissions heard.
Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues to
the defendant to be served through all modes as prayed for
12.02.2025 on filing of PF.
PF with the envelope with requisite postal stamps be
filed within one week.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04, North West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
07.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ/16/2025
CNR No. DLNW010000592025
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
26.09.2026
Present: Ms. Sita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Divya Singh, ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that plaintiff
efiled an application under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC. Copy of the same has
already been supplied to the defendant.
Time sought by the proxy counsel for the defendant for filing
reply to the aforesaid application.
It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that plaintiff is
senior citizen and prayed for short date.
Matter be re-listed for filing reply, if any and arguments on
aforesaid application under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC on 28.01.2027. The
defendant is directed to supply copy of reply, if any to the plaintiff at least
7 days prior to next date of hearing against acknowledgment.
(Anuj Kumar Singh)
DJ-04/North-West
Rohini Courts/Delhi
26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL VS. RENU
30.04.2026
Present: Ms. Sita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted that document u/s
63BSA of Evidence Act is not brought on record and seeks
adjournment for filing of the same.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff is at liberty to file above
document along with application before NDOH.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to supply copy of
above document to opposite party in advance before NDOH.
Matter be listed for PE on 26.09.2026.
(RAKESH KUMAR V)
DJ-04/North-West
Rohini Courts/Delhi
30.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 16/25 HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
09.12.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave in first half.
Present: Sh. Deepak Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Modgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Evidence affidavit filed through online on
08.12.2025. Hard copy place on record. Copy supplied.
Put up for purpose already fixed for 30.04.2026.
Reader
09.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
03.09.2025
Present: Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
List of witnesses filed on behalf of plaintiff online on
28.05.2025 is reflecting on CIS. In the same, there is no mention
about purpose in respect of witnesses mentioned at serial no. 2
and 3 for which they are to be examined. Affidavit of plaintiff
has been filed online on 02.09.2025 as reflecting on CIS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff stated that witness no. 2 is
son of plaintiff who was running shop which has now been
closed, is relevant witness and is to be examined and she will file
his affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for defendant stated that he wants to
examine both the witnesses simultaneously. Considering the
submissions, matter is adjourned for 09.12.2025 for plaintiff
evidence.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 03.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
06.05.2025
Present: Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Mudgil, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication has been filed online on 01.05.2025.
Hard copy is placed on file.
Pleadings are stated to be complete.
Submissions heard on the settlement of issues.
From the submissions and pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed as arises:-
(1) Whether the plaintiff has suffered any damage at
the acts of defendants as alleged ? OPP
(2) If the issue is decided in favour of plaintiff, for
what amount, he is entitled to recover and from which
defendant ? OPP
(3) Relief.
No other issue arises or pressed for. The counsels
appearing for the parties stated that there is no likelihood of the
settlement of matter between the parties at this stage, as such,
there is no use of referring the parties to adopt ADR means. List
of witnesses be filed within 15 days by the parties.
Put up for plaintiff's evidence for 03.09.2025.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 06.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
12.02.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants is filed
with copy of written statement of defendant no. 1 to 6. Written
statement on behalf of defendant no. 1 to 6 as uploaded on
10.02.2025 is reflecting on CIS.
It is stated by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that some
additional documents have been filed online on 11.02.2025.
Same is not reflecting on CIS. Hard copy is placed on file. Copy
supplied.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file
replication.
As prayed, put up on 06.05.2025 for filing of
replication, completion of pleadings and settlement of issues.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04/North-West
RHC/Delhi 12.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 41
CS DJ 16/25
HOTI LAL Vs. RENU
07.01.2025
Fresh suit filed online is received by way of assignment. The
copy of plaint received on Internet be checked and matter be
registered as per rules.
Present : Ms. Seeta Mishra, Ld counsel for plaintiff.
Hard copy with requisite court fees is placed on file.
Submissions heard.
Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues to
the defendant to be served through all modes as prayed for
12.02.2025 on filing of PF.
PF with the envelope with requisite postal stamps be
filed within one week.
(SUNIL CHAUDHARY)
DJ-04, North West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi
07.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --