Full Order Text
Interim Order 9 · 27 Jan 2026 · CNR DLNT030025272023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24CS SCJ1307/23HORIL YADAV Vs. BILTU YADAV ` 27.01.2026 Present: Mr. Raja Kashyap and Navjot Singh Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Plaintiff in person. Mr. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for defendant. Defendant in person. Matter is at the stage of PE. Between the intervening dates, an application is filed on behalf of plaintiff for filing of additional documents and reply is also filed on behalf of defendant to the same. Arguments heard. Record perused. It is a settled law that procedure is hand maid of justice and it is also settled law that procedural technicalities should not prevent substantive justice. Therefore, if a procedural violation does not prejudice the other party, the Court my take a lenient view and Court should allow applications for placing on record additional documents if the documents are necessary for just and fair disposal of the case. In the case titled Levaku Pedda Reddamma Vs. Gottumukkala Venkata Subbamma 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 533, Hon'ble Apex Court observed that refusing permission to a party in a civil suit to produce additional documents even if there is delay will lead to denial of justice. In such cases, the trial Court can impose some cost rather than to decline the production of document itself. -- 1 of 2 -- Though the plaintiff could have filed these documents at the time of filing of plaint also however, dening the plaintiff to file these documents will cause irreparable injuries, accordingly, the application stands allowed subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000/-, payable to opposide side. Application stands disposed off accordingly. Put up the matter for PE on 29.04.2026 (RENU) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.01.2026 -- 2 of 2 --