Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4 CS SCJ 9/25
SUNITA GOEL Vs. SAMBHAV GOEL
`
26.12.2025
Present: Sh. Rishikesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with
Plaintiff.
Sh. Anubhav Dubey, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 4
with D-2 and 4 (Through VC).
An application filed on behalf of the Plaintiff for substituted
service upon D-1 and 3. Same is taken on record.
By way of the present application, request has been made
for substituted service upon Defendant-1 and 3 on the ground that the
current address of the said Defendants could not be traced by the
Plaintiff. It has also been averred that Defendant-1 and 3 are
intentionally avoiding service. Affidavit regarding the aforesaid facts is
also annexed with the application.
This Court is satisfied that Defendant-1 and 3 cannot be
served through the ordinary way. Accordingly, the present application
stands allowed. Defendant-1 and 3 be served by way of publication in
Virat Vaibhav and Top Story. Publication charges and PF, if any, be
deposited within a week from today. Application stands disposed off.
Further, D-2 and 4 were directed to remain present in the
Court for recording their statement. However, it is submitted by
Defendants that they could not appear today as D-2 is feeling unwell.
Arguments heard on application under Section 151 CPC for
seeking permission for installation of CCTV camera in the suit premises
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
of the plaintiff floor and further seeking directions to restrain D-2 and 4
not to create any hinderance in access for repairing work for tap,
electricity appliance or any other work.
It is an admitted fact that plaintiff is in the possession of
ground floor of suit property, ie, H. No. T-111A, Gali no. 4, Shivaji
Nagar, Narela, Mamoorpur District, Delhi-40 and as such plaintiff is not
required to seek permission from this Court to instal CCTV camera in
her floor. Further, D-2 and 4 do not have any right to create any
objection or hinderance if the plaintiff wishes to install CCTV camera
on the floor which is in exclusive possession of the Plaintiff.
Accordingly, the Defendants are directed not to create any hinderance in
the installation of CCTV camera at the ground floor of suit property.
Application stands disposed off as allowed only to the extent that
plaintiff is at liberty to install CCTV camera on the floor which is in her
exclusive possession, ie, ground floor of suit property.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 23.04.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/26.12.2025
-- 2 of 2 --