SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMAVsSANJIV THAKUR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV
THAKUR
22.09.2026
Present: Shri Yash Kumar and Shri Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff.
Ms. Nisha, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Taken on record.
An application u/o 8 rule 1 CPC for condonation of
delay in filing of WS has been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Copy supplied.
Arguments heard.
It is settled law that procedure is the hand maid of
justice. In the interest of justice and to afford an opportunity to
the defendant to contest the matter on merits. This court is of the
opinion that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of
delay. Accordingly, application is allowed. The delay in filing
the WS is condoned subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- payable to
plaintiff by the defendant.
WS is taken on record. Replication be filed within
the stipulated period.
Arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC
heard on behalf of both the parties.
Put up for orders on 03.10.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV
THAKUR
08.04.2026
Present: Shri Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
(Through VC).
Shri Surender Chauhan, Ms. Prachi and Ms. Nisha,
Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC)
W/S on behalf of defendant alongwith reply to
application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 filed on behalf of defendant.
Copy has already been supplied to the opposite party.
It is seen that W/S has been filed beyond the
stipulated period of 30 days.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks sometime to file
appropriate application for condonotion of delay.
Let the same be filed with advance copy to the
opposite party.
Put up arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC and for filing of application for condonotion of delay on
04.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/08.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
14.03.2026
File is taken up today as it was holiday on 02.03.2026 declared by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide notification no. 432-483/G-4/Genl.I/DHC Dt.
27.02.2026.
Present: Sh. Yaspal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Surender Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC)..
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some time to file reply to the
application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Advance copy be supplied to the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the said application on 08.04.2026 at 02.00 pm.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
`
20.02.2026
Present: Sh. Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff.
Sh. Surender Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through
VC).
Time sought to file reply to application under Order
XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC as Counsel for defendant is contesting for
elections of BCD scheduled to be held from 21.02.2026 to 23.02.2026.
Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for reply / arguments on 02.03.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
02.02.2026
File taken up today as an application filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Present: Sh. Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant / Plaintiff.
The present application has been filed for seeking early hearing.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the Applicant that the
Defendant had appeared on PDOH and he was directed to file WS along with
reply to application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC. However,
thereafter, the Defendant has speed up the damaging process of property
despite the knowledge of present suit pending before this Court.
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant also placed on record certain
photographs.
Submisions heard. Record perused. In view of submissions
made, application stands disposed off as allowed.
Notice of the said application be sent to the non applicant, on
filing of PF. Notice be also sent to the Defendant through his counsel. Steps
be taken from one week from today.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 20.02.2026.
Alternative date, if any, stands cancelled.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33CS SCJ23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
`
23.01.2026
Present: Sh. Ashish Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Nisha and Sh. Surender Chauhan (Through VC), Ld.
Counsel for the Defendant
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant that he has not
received copy of the documents annexed with plaint. Same are supplied
from spare copy from the judicial file.
WS and reply to application under Order XXXIX Rule 1
and 2 CPC, if any, be filed within the stipulated period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 11.05.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/2026
Seema Thakur @ Pooja Varma Vs. Sanjiv Thakur
06.01.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Yash Pal Sapra, Sh. Ashish Sapra and Ms. Nishika, Ld.
counsels for plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, if any, to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken
within two working days from today, returnable for 23.01.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/06.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV
THAKUR
22.09.2026
Present: Shri Yash Kumar and Shri Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff.
Ms. Nisha, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Taken on record.
An application u/o 8 rule 1 CPC for condonation of
delay in filing of WS has been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Copy supplied.
Arguments heard.
It is settled law that procedure is the hand maid of
justice. In the interest of justice and to afford an opportunity to
the defendant to contest the matter on merits. This court is of the
opinion that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of
delay. Accordingly, application is allowed. The delay in filing
the WS is condoned subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- payable to
plaintiff by the defendant.
WS is taken on record. Replication be filed within
the stipulated period.
Arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC
heard on behalf of both the parties.
Put up for orders on 03.10.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV
THAKUR
08.04.2026
Present: Shri Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
(Through VC).
Shri Surender Chauhan, Ms. Prachi and Ms. Nisha,
Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC)
W/S on behalf of defendant alongwith reply to
application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 filed on behalf of defendant.
Copy has already been supplied to the opposite party.
It is seen that W/S has been filed beyond the
stipulated period of 30 days.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks sometime to file
appropriate application for condonotion of delay.
Let the same be filed with advance copy to the
opposite party.
Put up arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC and for filing of application for condonotion of delay on
04.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/08.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
14.03.2026
File is taken up today as it was holiday on 02.03.2026 declared by the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide notification no. 432-483/G-4/Genl.I/DHC Dt.
27.02.2026.
Present: Sh. Yaspal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Surender Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC)..
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some time to file reply to the
application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Advance copy be supplied to the opposite party.
Put up for arguments on the said application on 08.04.2026 at 02.00 pm.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
`
20.02.2026
Present: Sh. Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff.
Sh. Surender Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through
VC).
Time sought to file reply to application under Order
XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC as Counsel for defendant is contesting for
elections of BCD scheduled to be held from 21.02.2026 to 23.02.2026.
Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for reply / arguments on 02.03.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
02.02.2026
File taken up today as an application filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant.
Present: Sh. Yashpal Sapra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant / Plaintiff.
The present application has been filed for seeking early hearing.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the Applicant that the
Defendant had appeared on PDOH and he was directed to file WS along with
reply to application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC. However,
thereafter, the Defendant has speed up the damaging process of property
despite the knowledge of present suit pending before this Court.
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant also placed on record certain
photographs.
Submisions heard. Record perused. In view of submissions
made, application stands disposed off as allowed.
Notice of the said application be sent to the non applicant, on
filing of PF. Notice be also sent to the Defendant through his counsel. Steps
be taken from one week from today.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 20.02.2026.
Alternative date, if any, stands cancelled.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33CS SCJ23/26
SEEMA THAKUR ALIAS POOJA VARMA Vs. SANJIV THAKUR
`
23.01.2026
Present: Sh. Ashish Sapra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Nisha and Sh. Surender Chauhan (Through VC), Ld.
Counsel for the Defendant
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant that he has not
received copy of the documents annexed with plaint. Same are supplied
from spare copy from the judicial file.
WS and reply to application under Order XXXIX Rule 1
and 2 CPC, if any, be filed within the stipulated period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 11.05.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 23/2026
Seema Thakur @ Pooja Varma Vs. Sanjiv Thakur
06.01.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Yash Pal Sapra, Sh. Ashish Sapra and Ms. Nishika, Ld.
counsels for plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, if any, to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken
within two working days from today, returnable for 23.01.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/06.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --