SMT INDUVsSUB REGISTRAR I +3 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1305/25S
MT INDU Vs. SUB REGISTRAR I
28.03.2026
Present: Shri Dharmender Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(Through VC).
In compliance of previous order, plaintiff has filed copy
of legal notice u/s 80 CPC alongwith original speed post receipt and
internet generated tracking report. Certain other documents have
also been filed by the plaintiff. Taken on record.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that
plaintiff wishes to delete defendant no.2 from array of parties.
Let the statement be recorded to that effect on NDOH.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant no. 1, 3 and
4 in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken
within one week.
List on 28.05.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/28.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 1305/25
SMT INDU Vs. SUB REGISTRAR
22.12.2025
Present: Sh. Dharmendra Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Matter is listed for consideration.
Perusal of the case file shows that compliance of S. 80 CPC
has not been done.
It is mentioned in the plaint that various letters have been
sent to the D-2. However, till date, Plaintiff has not received any reply.
Perusal of the case file shows that those notices are different from the
notice required to be served u/S 80 CPC and the purpose of issuing
notice u/S 80 CPC is to give the government or public officer a
mandatory two month prior warning before a law suit is filed against
them, allowing them time to reveiw the plaint, settle the dispute or
prepare a defence. Therefore, the earlier notices issued by plaintiff
cannot be said in compliance of Sec. 80 CPC.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to comply with provisions
of Sec. 80 CPC.
Be taken up on 28.03.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1305/25
Smt Indu Vs. Sub Registrar I
11.07.2026
Present: Shri Dharmender Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff (Through VC).
Shri Ajay, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.3.
Defendant no.2 not summoned.
Report on summons to defendant no. 1, 3 and 4
received back served.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of the
defendant no. 3.
One opportunity is given to defendant no. 1, 3 and 4
to file WS. Same be filed alongwith appropriate application for
condonotion of delay, if any with advance copy to the opposite
party.
Put up on 22.10.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/11.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1305/25S
MT INDU Vs. SUB REGISTRAR I
28.03.2026
Present: Shri Dharmender Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(Through VC).
In compliance of previous order, plaintiff has filed copy
of legal notice u/s 80 CPC alongwith original speed post receipt and
internet generated tracking report. Certain other documents have
also been filed by the plaintiff. Taken on record.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that
plaintiff wishes to delete defendant no.2 from array of parties.
Let the statement be recorded to that effect on NDOH.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant no. 1, 3 and
4 in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken
within one week.
List on 28.05.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/28.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 1305/25
SMT INDU Vs. SUB REGISTRAR
22.12.2025
Present: Sh. Dharmendra Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Matter is listed for consideration.
Perusal of the case file shows that compliance of S. 80 CPC
has not been done.
It is mentioned in the plaint that various letters have been
sent to the D-2. However, till date, Plaintiff has not received any reply.
Perusal of the case file shows that those notices are different from the
notice required to be served u/S 80 CPC and the purpose of issuing
notice u/S 80 CPC is to give the government or public officer a
mandatory two month prior warning before a law suit is filed against
them, allowing them time to reveiw the plaint, settle the dispute or
prepare a defence. Therefore, the earlier notices issued by plaintiff
cannot be said in compliance of Sec. 80 CPC.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to comply with provisions
of Sec. 80 CPC.
Be taken up on 28.03.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --