AVNISH KHURANAVsRAM CHANDER +2 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
08.06.2026
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Jas Karan Singh Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1.
Sh. Yashpal Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2
through VC.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the
defendant no.1. Same is taken on record. The defendant
no.1 has been examined U/o 10 CPC.
Upon such examination, it has emerged that the
defendant has contended that he is not a tenant in the suit
property and he is in possession of the suit property on the
basis of agreement to sell executed by father of plaintiff.
However, no such agreement to sell is filed
along with WS. Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 requests
for one opportunity for perusing the record as he has been
recently engaged.
In the interest of justice, one opportunity is
granted to the defendant no.1 for the same. Defendant no.1
is directed to deposit/pay the previous cost.
Be put up for further proceedings on
10.08.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
08.06.2026
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Jas Karan Singh Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1.
Sh. Yashpal Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2
through VC.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the
defendant no.1. Same is taken on record. The defendant
no.1 has been examined U/o 10 CPC.
Upon such examination, it has emerged that the
defendant has contended that he is not a tenant in the suit
property and he is in possession of the suit property on the
basis of agreement to sell executed by father of plaintiff.
However, no such agreement to sell is filed
along with WS. Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 requests
for one opportunity for perusing the record as he has been
recently engaged.
In the interest of justice, one opportunity is
granted to the defendant no.1 for the same. Defendant no.1
is directed to deposit/pay the previous cost.
Be put up for further proceedings on
10.08.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA VS. RAM
CHANDER
23.01.2026
Present: Sh. Karan Singh Ld. Proxy Counsel for
plaintiff
Sh. Manoj Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC.
Ms. Preeti Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3 through VC.
Parties have not appeared despite directions.
In the interest of justice, one opportunity is
granted to both the parties to appear in person on NDOH.
To account for delay both the parties are burdened with cost
of Rs.1,000/- each to be deposited in DLSA.
Be put up appearance of parties/consideration
on issues/further proceedings on 06.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA VS. RAM
CHANDER
23.01.2026
Present: Sh. Karan Singh Ld. Proxy Counsel for
plaintiff
Sh. Manoj Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC.
Ms. Preeti Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3 through VC.
Parties have not appeared despite directions.
In the interest of justice, one opportunity is
granted to both the parties to appear in person on NDOH.
To account for delay both the parties are burdened with cost
of Rs.1,000/- each to be deposited in DLSA.
Be put up appearance of parties/consideration
on issues/further proceedings on 06.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
12.11.2025
Present: Sh Sanjay Yadav, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Manoj Kumar, ld counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC
Ms Ramna Sinha, ld counsel for defendant
no.2 through VC.
Sh Rahul Dabas, ld counsel for defendant no.3.
Status report has been filed on behalf of MCD.
Taken on record.
Defendant no.1 has not appeared despite
directions.
In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is
granted to defendant no.1 to present himself for examination
by this Court u/o X CPC, failing which appropriate directions
shall be passed.
Be put up for examination of parties/
consideration on issues on 23.01.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
12.11.2025
Present: Sh Sanjay Yadav, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Manoj Kumar, ld counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC
Ms Ramna Sinha, ld counsel for defendant
no.2 through VC.
Sh Rahul Dabas, ld counsel for defendant no.3.
Status report has been filed on behalf of MCD.
Taken on record.
Defendant no.1 has not appeared despite
directions.
In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is
granted to defendant no.1 to present himself for examination
by this Court u/o X CPC, failing which appropriate directions
shall be passed.
Be put up for examination of parties/
consideration on issues on 23.01.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
with plaintiff.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant/
MCD through VC with Sh. Sita Ram Meena,
APHI in person.
None for defendant no.1 and 2.
It is stated by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that
plaintiff does not wish to file any replication.
MCD is directed to file current status report
regarding the Dhaba being run at the suit property.
The plaintiff has claimed that the defendant
no.1 is a tenant in his property and has failed to make the
payment of rent. The defendant no.1 in his WS has admitted
the fact that the rent agreement was executed with the parents
of the defendant no.1. However, a plea has been taken that
the parents of the plaintiff had executed an agreement to sell
in his favour and since then the defendant is not liable to
make any payment to the plaintiff.
The defendant no.1 is directed to appear in
person on NDOH.
Be put up for 12.11.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
with plaintiff.
Sh. Rahul Dabas, Ld. Counsel for defendant/
MCD through VC with Sh. Sita Ram Meena,
APHI in person.
None for defendant no.1 and 2.
It is stated by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that
plaintiff does not wish to file any replication.
MCD is directed to file current status report
regarding the Dhaba being run at the suit property.
The plaintiff has claimed that the defendant
no.1 is a tenant in his property and has failed to make the
payment of rent. The defendant no.1 in his WS has admitted
the fact that the rent agreement was executed with the parents
of the defendant no.1. However, a plea has been taken that
the parents of the plaintiff had executed an agreement to sell
in his favour and since then the defendant is not liable to
make any payment to the plaintiff.
The defendant no.1 is directed to appear in
person on NDOH.
Be put up for 12.11.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
20.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rahul Dabas Ld. Counsel for
defendant/MCD along with Sh. Mahesh Sharma, Health
Inspector, Civil Lines, Delhi.
Sh. Yashpal, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.2/APMC through VC.
None for defendant no.1.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of MCD.
WS has been filed on behalf of defendant/MCD.
Same be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any be filed before NDOH
with advance copy to opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings/further
proceedings on 12.08.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
20.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rahul Dabas Ld. Counsel for
defendant/MCD along with Sh. Mahesh Sharma, Health
Inspector, Civil Lines, Delhi.
Sh. Yashpal, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.2/APMC through VC.
None for defendant no.1.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of MCD.
WS has been filed on behalf of defendant/MCD.
Same be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any be filed before NDOH
with advance copy to opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings/further
proceedings on 12.08.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
09.12.2024
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manoj Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC.
None for defendant no.2 and 3.
WS has already been filed on behalf of
defendant no.1 and 2.
No reply to the application U/o 7 rule 11 CPC
has been filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Defendant no.3 MCD is still unserved.
Let fresh summons be issued for settlement of
issues and notice of application U/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC to
defendant no.3 through DC Concerned on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post/AD for 20.03.2025.. Steps be taken
within 7 days.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/09.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1041/23 AVNISH KHURANA Vs. RAM
CHANDER
09.12.2024
Present: Sh. Sanjay Yadav Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manoj Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 through VC.
None for defendant no.2 and 3.
WS has already been filed on behalf of
defendant no.1 and 2.
No reply to the application U/o 7 rule 11 CPC
has been filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Defendant no.3 MCD is still unserved.
Let fresh summons be issued for settlement of
issues and notice of application U/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC to
defendant no.3 through DC Concerned on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post/AD for 20.03.2025.. Steps be taken
within 7 days.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/09.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --