Ram GopalVsRakesh Verma

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
23.04.2026
Present: Shri Puneet Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Kartik Bhardwaj, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Ld. proxy counsel for defendant seeks an adjournment for
addressing arguments on the said application due to non-availability of
main counsel.
Taking a lenient view, same is allowed.
Put up for arguments on the application under Order VII
Rule 11 CPC, on 22.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
17.03.2026
Present: Sh. Punit Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. Kartik Bhan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Since the arguments were advanced before Ld. Predecessor this court. As
such, the Court considers it fit to hear the arguments again.
Put up for arguments on the abovesaid application on 23.04.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/17.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
11.11.2025
Present: None.
Matter is listed for orders / clarifications on application
under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Certain clarifications required.
Put up the matter for clarifications on 09.12.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/11.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
09.09.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Manav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders on application under Order VII
Rule 11 CPC.
However, orders could not be pronounced today as
Undersigned is busy in dictating orders in CS SCJ37965/16 titled M/S
INDIAN GLASS TRADERS Vs. M/S CHAUHAN GLASS AND
ALLUMINIUM WORKS AND ANR and CS SCJ 478/24 titled Mittal
Finsec Pvt Ltd Vs. Ram Ratan Sahni. Hence, no time left.
Put up the matter for purpose fixed on 10.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
17.07.2025
Present: Sh. Harvinder Dass, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Arguments heard.
Put up the matter for orders / clarifications, if any, on
09.09.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
02.04.2025
Present: Sh. Bhuvan Tomar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Ujjawal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant (Through
VC).
Part arguments heard on point of valuation.
Be taken up for further arguments on 17.07.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26CS SCJ863/23RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
21.01.2025
Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
Present: Shri Shubham, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff
Shri Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Part arguments heard on application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Be taken up for further arguments on 02.04.2025.
Plaintiff is directed to clarify regarding valuation of the suit
for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
23.11.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Ahlawat, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Between the intervening dates, reply was filed by Ld.
Counsel for defendant to application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
At request, be taken up for arguments on 21.01.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
28.09.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Ahlawat, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Amended plaint was filed on 09.07.2024. Same is taken on
record.
Fresh application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was also
filed on same date. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite
party. Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH with advance copy to the other
side.
Be taken up for filing of reply / arguments on 23.11.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/28.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
25.04.2024
Present: Sh. Bhuvan Tomar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
None for the defendant.
Clarifications taken. Perusal of the case file shows that WS
along with application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was filed by the
Defendant on 01.02.2023. Subsequently, on 23.01.2024, an application
under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was filed by the Plaintiff. Subsequently, on
26.03.2024, Ld. Counsel for defendant stated that his application under
Order VII Rule 11 CPC be taken up first for adjudication and in this
regard, he relied on decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in Sayyed Ayaz Ali
Vs. Prakash G Goyal and RK Roja Vs. US Rayudu.
Vide a separate order of even date, application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC stands dismissed and application under Order VI Rule
17 CPC is hereby allowed. Amended plaint is taken on record.
Consequential WS, if any, be filed within the stipulated period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 09.07.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/25.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 44CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
01.04.2024
Present: None.
Certain clarifications required.
Put up the matter for clarifications on 25.04.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/01.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
26.03.2024
Present: Sh Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Reply not filed to the applications. However, two
judgments titled “RK Roja Vs. US Rayudu” and “Sayyed Ayaz Ali Vs.
Prakash G Goyal and Ors” have been filed on behalf of the Defendant.
Same is taken on record.
Submissions heard.
Matter be taken up for orders/clarifications, if any, on
01.04.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/26.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
23.01.2024
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders today. However, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff has filed two applications, i.e., Application u/O VI R 17
CPC and Application u/O VII R 14 CPC and has stated that the same be
taken up for adjudication. Copy of the same has been supplied to the
opposite side.
Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH with an advance copy to
the opposite side.
Put up the matter for arguments on 26.03.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
15.01.2024
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for clarifications on Application u/O
XXXIX R 1 and 2 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Submissions
heard afresh at request of Ld. Counsels for the parties.
Be taken up for orders on 23.01.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/15.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 49CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
18.12.2023
Present: Sh. Ajeet Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
This is parcha yadasht. File is not traceable.
Matter stands adjourned.
Ahlmad is directed to trace and place the file before the Court on the
next date of the hearing.
Matter be taken up on 15.01.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/18.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
02.12.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
WS was filed on behalf of the defendant on 01.12.2023.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that he has no objection to the same
being taken on record.
Submissions heard on the two Applications u/O XXXIX R
1 and 2 CPC.
Put up the matter for orders / clarificatios, if any, on
04.12.2023.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
05.10.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Fresh vakalatmana filed on behalf of the defendant. Same is
taken on record. WS be filed within the stipulated period.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant states that the address of the
Defendant mentioned in the memo of parties is incorrect and he
undertakes to file a proper application for the same. Heard. Allowed.
In light of the submissions made, Plaintiff is directed to
provide the copies of the annexures with the plaint within a week from
today and upon such furnishing, WS be filed within the stipulated
period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 02.12.2023
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
05.09.2023
Present: Sh. Dheeraj Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant yet to be served.
Process in terms of previous order received back unserved.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that an application for
effecting service through electronic mode was filed by him on
01.09.2023.
Submissions heard.
In light of the submissions made, the said application is
allowed.
Let the Defendant be also served electronically, through the
Nazarat Branch, upon her whatsapp number and email ID. Plaintiff is
directed to file an affidavit as regards the fact that the whatsapp number
furnished for service belongs and is being used by Defendant. Affidavit
be filed along with the PF within a week from today.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 05.10.2023.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
One of the regular stenographers of this Court is on Child Care Leave
and no substitute stenographer has been provided.
`
26.08.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Defendant yet to be served.
Process in terms of previous order received back unserved.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff that the
Defendant is residing at the address mentioned in the memo of parties
and he is intentionally avoiding service. Accordingly, Ld. Counsel for
the Plaintiff requests for fresh service upon the said address.
Heard. In light of the submissions made, let fresh court
notice be issued upon the Defendant for the next date of hearing.
Put up the matter for purpose fixed on 05.09.2023.
Dasti service as requested is allowed.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/26.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
09.08.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ajeet Kumar Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff (Enroll. No.
D 12216/2022).
Heard, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the application under Order
XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of
PF/RC. Steps be taken within one week. Dasti service is allowed, as prayed for.
List on 26.08.2023.
Let, the requisite undertaking regarding the payment of deficient court
fees, if any, in view of the circular no. F.10(1175)/COS (HQ)/ CD/3356 dt.
31.12.2013 regarding the SLP bearing no. 3323/13 title as Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs.
Delhi Bar Association regarding issue of court fees be filed by the plaintiff, if not
already filed by the NDOH as per rules.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
12.10.2026
Present: Sh. Puneet Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Kartik Bhan, Ld. proxy counsel for the
defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application
under Order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff seeks an
adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is not available
today.
Heard. Allowed.
It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be
granted to either of the parties for the said purpose.
Put up for arguments on the application under Order
7 rule 11 CPC on 27.01.2027.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/12.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
23.04.2026
Present: Shri Puneet Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Shri Kartik Bhardwaj, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Ld. proxy counsel for defendant seeks an adjournment for
addressing arguments on the said application due to non-availability of
main counsel.
Taking a lenient view, same is allowed.
Put up for arguments on the application under Order VII
Rule 11 CPC, on 22.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
17.03.2026
Present: Sh. Punit Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. Kartik Bhan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Since the arguments were advanced before Ld. Predecessor this court. As
such, the Court considers it fit to hear the arguments again.
Put up for arguments on the abovesaid application on 23.04.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/17.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
11.11.2025
Present: None.
Matter is listed for orders / clarifications on application
under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Certain clarifications required.
Put up the matter for clarifications on 09.12.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/11.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
09.09.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Manav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders on application under Order VII
Rule 11 CPC.
However, orders could not be pronounced today as
Undersigned is busy in dictating orders in CS SCJ37965/16 titled M/S
INDIAN GLASS TRADERS Vs. M/S CHAUHAN GLASS AND
ALLUMINIUM WORKS AND ANR and CS SCJ 478/24 titled Mittal
Finsec Pvt Ltd Vs. Ram Ratan Sahni. Hence, no time left.
Put up the matter for purpose fixed on 10.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
17.07.2025
Present: Sh. Harvinder Dass, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Arguments heard.
Put up the matter for orders / clarifications, if any, on
09.09.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
02.04.2025
Present: Sh. Bhuvan Tomar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Ujjawal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant (Through
VC).
Part arguments heard on point of valuation.
Be taken up for further arguments on 17.07.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26CS SCJ863/23RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
21.01.2025
Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
Present: Shri Shubham, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff
Shri Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Part arguments heard on application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Be taken up for further arguments on 02.04.2025.
Plaintiff is directed to clarify regarding valuation of the suit
for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
23.11.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Ahlawat, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Between the intervening dates, reply was filed by Ld.
Counsel for defendant to application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
At request, be taken up for arguments on 21.01.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
28.09.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Ahlawat, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Amended plaint was filed on 09.07.2024. Same is taken on
record.
Fresh application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was also
filed on same date. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite
party. Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH with advance copy to the other
side.
Be taken up for filing of reply / arguments on 23.11.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/28.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
25.04.2024
Present: Sh. Bhuvan Tomar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
None for the defendant.
Clarifications taken. Perusal of the case file shows that WS
along with application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was filed by the
Defendant on 01.02.2023. Subsequently, on 23.01.2024, an application
under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was filed by the Plaintiff. Subsequently, on
26.03.2024, Ld. Counsel for defendant stated that his application under
Order VII Rule 11 CPC be taken up first for adjudication and in this
regard, he relied on decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in Sayyed Ayaz Ali
Vs. Prakash G Goyal and RK Roja Vs. US Rayudu.
Vide a separate order of even date, application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC stands dismissed and application under Order VI Rule
17 CPC is hereby allowed. Amended plaint is taken on record.
Consequential WS, if any, be filed within the stipulated period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 09.07.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/25.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 44CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
01.04.2024
Present: None.
Certain clarifications required.
Put up the matter for clarifications on 25.04.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/01.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
26.03.2024
Present: Sh Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Reply not filed to the applications. However, two
judgments titled “RK Roja Vs. US Rayudu” and “Sayyed Ayaz Ali Vs.
Prakash G Goyal and Ors” have been filed on behalf of the Defendant.
Same is taken on record.
Submissions heard.
Matter be taken up for orders/clarifications, if any, on
01.04.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/26.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
23.01.2024
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for orders today. However, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff has filed two applications, i.e., Application u/O VI R 17
CPC and Application u/O VII R 14 CPC and has stated that the same be
taken up for adjudication. Copy of the same has been supplied to the
opposite side.
Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH with an advance copy to
the opposite side.
Put up the matter for arguments on 26.03.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
15.01.2024
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for clarifications on Application u/O
XXXIX R 1 and 2 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Submissions
heard afresh at request of Ld. Counsels for the parties.
Be taken up for orders on 23.01.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/15.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 49CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
18.12.2023
Present: Sh. Ajeet Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
This is parcha yadasht. File is not traceable.
Matter stands adjourned.
Ahlmad is directed to trace and place the file before the Court on the
next date of the hearing.
Matter be taken up on 15.01.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/18.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
02.12.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
WS was filed on behalf of the defendant on 01.12.2023.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that he has no objection to the same
being taken on record.
Submissions heard on the two Applications u/O XXXIX R
1 and 2 CPC.
Put up the matter for orders / clarificatios, if any, on
04.12.2023.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/02.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
05.10.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Gautam Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Fresh vakalatmana filed on behalf of the defendant. Same is
taken on record. WS be filed within the stipulated period.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant states that the address of the
Defendant mentioned in the memo of parties is incorrect and he
undertakes to file a proper application for the same. Heard. Allowed.
In light of the submissions made, Plaintiff is directed to
provide the copies of the annexures with the plaint within a week from
today and upon such furnishing, WS be filed within the stipulated
period.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 02.12.2023
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
`
05.09.2023
Present: Sh. Dheeraj Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant yet to be served.
Process in terms of previous order received back unserved.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that an application for
effecting service through electronic mode was filed by him on
01.09.2023.
Submissions heard.
In light of the submissions made, the said application is
allowed.
Let the Defendant be also served electronically, through the
Nazarat Branch, upon her whatsapp number and email ID. Plaintiff is
directed to file an affidavit as regards the fact that the whatsapp number
furnished for service belongs and is being used by Defendant. Affidavit
be filed along with the PF within a week from today.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 05.10.2023.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
One of the regular stenographers of this Court is on Child Care Leave
and no substitute stenographer has been provided.
`
26.08.2023
Present: Sh. Vineet Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Defendant yet to be served.
Process in terms of previous order received back unserved.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff that the
Defendant is residing at the address mentioned in the memo of parties
and he is intentionally avoiding service. Accordingly, Ld. Counsel for
the Plaintiff requests for fresh service upon the said address.
Heard. In light of the submissions made, let fresh court
notice be issued upon the Defendant for the next date of hearing.
Put up the matter for purpose fixed on 05.09.2023.
Dasti service as requested is allowed.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/26.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ863/23
RAM GOPAL Vs. RAKESH VERMA
09.08.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ajeet Kumar Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff (Enroll. No.
D 12216/2022).
Heard, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the application under Order
XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of
PF/RC. Steps be taken within one week. Dasti service is allowed, as prayed for.
List on 26.08.2023.
Let, the requisite undertaking regarding the payment of deficient court
fees, if any, in view of the circular no. F.10(1175)/COS (HQ)/ CD/3356 dt.
31.12.2013 regarding the SLP bearing no. 3323/13 title as Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs.
Delhi Bar Association regarding issue of court fees be filed by the plaintiff, if not
already filed by the NDOH as per rules.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --