CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE
KISHOR KUMARVsMAHESH alias RINKU
CNR DLNT030015002024427-ACJ CUM ARC
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 966/2024
- Registration Date
- 04 Sept 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 27 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1--- · Sec OrderXXXVII
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 04-09-2024 Business: f Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2025 Date: 09-01-2025 Business: f Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2025 Date: 16-04-2025 Business: f Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2025 Date: 29-07-2025 Business: f Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2025 Date: 13-11-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2026 Date: 14-01-2026 Business: f Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2026 Date: 17-04-2026 Business: f Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2026 Date: 03-07-2026 Business: f Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1489/2024 Filing Date: 02-09-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230002574C202400012 eFiling Date: 27-08-2024 First Hearing Date: 04th September 2024 Court Number And Judge: 427-ACJ CUM ARC
Orders
16Interim Order 803 Jul 2026
03 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 03.07.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC. Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Perusal of the Shapath Patra on the basis of which present suit has been filed u/o XXXVII CPC states that defendant sometime paid the amount and sometime did not pay the amount. For the purpose of order XXXVII CPC the due amount has to be a liquidated sum. However, in the Shapath Patra, there is a mention of a loan of Rs 1,50,000/- and further amount of Rs 80,000/-. In the opinion of the court, the Shapath Patra does not show a liquidated sum as the amount paid by the defendant has not been accounted for. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has sought time for addressing arguments on leave to defend. Heard. Allowed. To come up for arguments on 27.10.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/03.07.2026(G) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 717 Apr 2026
17 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH @ RINKU 17.04.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC) Ms. Sarita Tiwari, Proxy Counsel for the defendant. An adjournment has been sought by proxy counsel for defendant on the ground that main counsel is not available today. Considering the submissions, matter stands adjourned, however, it is the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue on leave to defend application. To come up for arguments on 03.07.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/17.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 614 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 14.01.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff via VC. Sh. B K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defendant. Summons for judgment received back unserved. However, ld. Counsel has appeared alongwith defendant. Summons for judgment served upon the defendant today in the court. Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that leave to defend filed earlier may be considered. Considering the submissions of ld. Counsel, leave to defend filed earlier by the defendant is considered. To come up for arguments on leave to defend on 17.04.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/14.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 513 Nov 2025
13 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 13.11.2025 Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ms. Sarika Tiwari, proxy Counsel for the defendant with defendant. PF not filed. Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF within 3 days returnable for 14.01.2026. Application filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has withdrawn the present application. In view thereof, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/13.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 429 Jul 2025
29 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 29.07.2025 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC. Sh. DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant. As per report of Ahlmad, PF not filed. Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF for NDOH. To come up for further proceedings on 13.11.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/29.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 316 Apr 2025
16 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 16.04.2025 Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defednant. On the LDOH, defendant has already filed his address. Let summons of judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF within 10 days returnable for NDOH. Record shows that defendant has already filed leave to defend, however, same shall be considered only upon the service of summons for judgment upon the defendant. To come up for further proceedings on 29.07.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/16.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 209 Jan 2025
09 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 09.01.2025 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. D K Pandey, ld. Counsel for the defendant. In between the dates of hearings, defendant has filed an application for leave to defend. Defendant is directed to supply the copy of leave to defend to plaintiff within 15 days from today. To come up for reply, if any/ arguments on leave to defend on 16.04.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/09.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 104 Sept 2024
04 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS No. 966/2024. Kishore Kumar VS Mahesh @ Rinku. 04.09.2024 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Heard. File perused. Issue summons of the suit, as provided under Order XXXVII CPC, to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within 15 days returnable on 09.01.2025. (Manish Jain) ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North Rohini Court-04.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 803 Jul 2026
03 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 03.07.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC. Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Perusal of the Shapath Patra on the basis of which present suit has been filed u/o XXXVII CPC states that defendant sometime paid the amount and sometime did not pay the amount. For the purpose of order XXXVII CPC the due amount has to be a liquidated sum. However, in the Shapath Patra, there is a mention of a loan of Rs 1,50,000/- and further amount of Rs 80,000/-. In the opinion of the court, the Shapath Patra does not show a liquidated sum as the amount paid by the defendant has not been accounted for. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has sought time for addressing arguments on leave to defend. Heard. Allowed. To come up for arguments on 27.10.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/03.07.2026(G) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 717 Apr 2026
17 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH @ RINKU 17.04.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC) Ms. Sarita Tiwari, Proxy Counsel for the defendant. An adjournment has been sought by proxy counsel for defendant on the ground that main counsel is not available today. Considering the submissions, matter stands adjourned, however, it is the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue on leave to defend application. To come up for arguments on 03.07.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/17.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 614 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 14.01.2026 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff via VC. Sh. B K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defendant. Summons for judgment received back unserved. However, ld. Counsel has appeared alongwith defendant. Summons for judgment served upon the defendant today in the court. Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that leave to defend filed earlier may be considered. Considering the submissions of ld. Counsel, leave to defend filed earlier by the defendant is considered. To come up for arguments on leave to defend on 17.04.2026. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/14.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 513 Nov 2025
13 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 13.11.2025 Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ms. Sarika Tiwari, proxy Counsel for the defendant with defendant. PF not filed. Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF within 3 days returnable for 14.01.2026. Application filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has withdrawn the present application. In view thereof, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/13.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 429 Jul 2025
29 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 29.07.2025 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC. Sh. DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant. As per report of Ahlmad, PF not filed. Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF for NDOH. To come up for further proceedings on 13.11.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/29.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 316 Apr 2025
16 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 16.04.2025 Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defednant. On the LDOH, defendant has already filed his address. Let summons of judgment be served upon the defendant on filing of PF within 10 days returnable for NDOH. Record shows that defendant has already filed leave to defend, however, same shall be considered only upon the service of summons for judgment upon the defendant. To come up for further proceedings on 29.07.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/16.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 209 Jan 2025
09 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 966/24 KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU 09.01.2025 Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. D K Pandey, ld. Counsel for the defendant. In between the dates of hearings, defendant has filed an application for leave to defend. Defendant is directed to supply the copy of leave to defend to plaintiff within 15 days from today. To come up for reply, if any/ arguments on leave to defend on 16.04.2025. (Ajay Singh Parihar) ACJ-cum-ARC/North Rohini Court/09.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 104 Sept 2024
04 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS No. 966/2024. Kishore Kumar VS Mahesh @ Rinku. 04.09.2024 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Heard. File perused. Issue summons of the suit, as provided under Order XXXVII CPC, to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within 15 days returnable on 09.01.2025. (Manish Jain) ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North Rohini Court-04.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
