Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

KISHOR KUMARVsMAHESH alias RINKU

CNR DLNT030015002024427-ACJ CUM ARC
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
966/2024
Registration Date
04 Sept 2024
Next Hearing Date
27 Oct 2026
Case Stage
Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1KISHOR KUMAR

    Acts & Sections

    1
    --- · Sec OrderXXXVII

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-09-2024
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2025
    
    Date: 09-01-2025
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2025
    
    Date: 16-04-2025
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2025
    
    Date: 29-07-2025
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2025
    
    Date: 13-11-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2026
    
    Date: 14-01-2026
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2026
    
    Date: 17-04-2026
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2026
    
    Date: 03-07-2026
    Business: f
    Next Purpose: Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1489/2024
    Filing Date: 02-09-2024
    eFiling Number: ADL20230002574C202400012
    eFiling Date: 27-08-2024
    First Hearing Date: 04th September 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 427-ACJ CUM ARC

    Orders

    16
    Interim Order 8
    03 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    03.07.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    via VC.
    Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
    Perusal of the
    Shapath Patra on the basis of which
    present suit has been filed u/o XXXVII CPC states that defendant
    sometime paid the amount and sometime did not pay the amount.
    For the purpose of order XXXVII CPC the due amount
    has to be a liquidated sum. However, in the
    Shapath Patra, there is a
    mention of a loan of Rs 1,50,000/- and further amount of Rs
    80,000/-. In the opinion of the court, the
    Shapath Patra does not
    show a liquidated sum as the amount paid by the defendant has not
    been accounted for.
    Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has sought time for
    addressing arguments on leave to defend.
    Heard. Allowed.
    To come up for arguments on 27.10.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/03.07.2026(G)
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 7
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH @ RINKU
    17.04.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    (through VC)
    Ms. Sarita Tiwari, Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
    An adjournment has been sought by proxy counsel for
    defendant on the ground that main counsel is not available today.
    Considering the submissions, matter stands adjourned, however, it is
    the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue on leave to
    defend application.
    To come up for arguments on 03.07.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/17.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 6
    14 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    14.01.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff via VC.
    Sh. B K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with
    defendant.
    Summons for judgment received back unserved.
    However, ld. Counsel has appeared alongwith defendant.
    Summons for judgment served upon the defendant
    today in the court.
    Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that leave
    to defend filed earlier may be considered.
    Considering the submissions of ld. Counsel, leave to
    defend filed earlier by the defendant is considered.
    To come up for arguments on leave to defend on
    17.04.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/14.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5
    13 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    13.11.2025
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Ms. Sarika Tiwari, proxy Counsel for the defendant
    with defendant.
    PF not filed.
    Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the
    defendant on filing of PF within 3 days returnable for
    14.01.2026.
    Application filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Ld.
    Counsel for plaintiff has withdrawn the present application. In
    view thereof, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/13.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    29 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    29.07.2025
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC.
    Sh. DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
    As per report of Ahlmad, PF not filed.
    Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the
    defendant on filing of PF for NDOH.
    To come up for further proceedings on 13.11.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/29.07.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    16 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    16.04.2025
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with
    defednant.
    On the LDOH, defendant has already filed his address.
    Let summons of judgment be served upon the defendant
    on filing of PF within 10 days returnable for NDOH.
    Record shows that defendant has already filed leave to
    defend, however, same shall be considered only upon the service of
    summons for judgment upon the defendant.
    To come up for further proceedings on 29.07.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/16.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    09 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    09.01.2025
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. D K Pandey, ld. Counsel for the defendant.
    In between the dates of hearings, defendant has filed an
    application for leave to defend.
    Defendant is directed to supply the copy of leave to defend to
    plaintiff within 15 days from today.
    To come up for reply, if any/ arguments on leave to defend on
    16.04.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/09.01.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    04 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: CS No. 966/2024.
    Kishore Kumar VS Mahesh @ Rinku.
    04.09.2024
    Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
    registered.
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Heard. File perused.
    Issue summons of the suit, as provided under Order XXXVII
    CPC, to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within 15 days returnable on
    09.01.2025.
    (Manish Jain)
    ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North
    Rohini Court-04.09.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 8
    03 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    03.07.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    via VC.
    Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
    Perusal of the
    Shapath Patra on the basis of which
    present suit has been filed u/o XXXVII CPC states that defendant
    sometime paid the amount and sometime did not pay the amount.
    For the purpose of order XXXVII CPC the due amount
    has to be a liquidated sum. However, in the
    Shapath Patra, there is a
    mention of a loan of Rs 1,50,000/- and further amount of Rs
    80,000/-. In the opinion of the court, the
    Shapath Patra does not
    show a liquidated sum as the amount paid by the defendant has not
    been accounted for.
    Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has sought time for
    addressing arguments on leave to defend.
    Heard. Allowed.
    To come up for arguments on 27.10.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/03.07.2026(G)
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 7
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH @ RINKU
    17.04.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    (through VC)
    Ms. Sarita Tiwari, Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
    An adjournment has been sought by proxy counsel for
    defendant on the ground that main counsel is not available today.
    Considering the submissions, matter stands adjourned, however, it is
    the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue on leave to
    defend application.
    To come up for arguments on 03.07.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/17.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6
    14 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    14.01.2026
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff via VC.
    Sh. B K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with
    defendant.
    Summons for judgment received back unserved.
    However, ld. Counsel has appeared alongwith defendant.
    Summons for judgment served upon the defendant
    today in the court.
    Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that leave
    to defend filed earlier may be considered.
    Considering the submissions of ld. Counsel, leave to
    defend filed earlier by the defendant is considered.
    To come up for arguments on leave to defend on
    17.04.2026.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/14.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    13 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    13.11.2025
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Ms. Sarika Tiwari, proxy Counsel for the defendant
    with defendant.
    PF not filed.
    Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the
    defendant on filing of PF within 3 days returnable for
    14.01.2026.
    Application filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Ld.
    Counsel for plaintiff has withdrawn the present application. In
    view thereof, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/13.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    29 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    29.07.2025
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff via VC.
    Sh. DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
    As per report of Ahlmad, PF not filed.
    Let fresh summons for judgment be served upon the
    defendant on filing of PF for NDOH.
    To come up for further proceedings on 13.11.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/29.07.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    16 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    16.04.2025
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. D K Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with
    defednant.
    On the LDOH, defendant has already filed his address.
    Let summons of judgment be served upon the defendant
    on filing of PF within 10 days returnable for NDOH.
    Record shows that defendant has already filed leave to
    defend, however, same shall be considered only upon the service of
    summons for judgment upon the defendant.
    To come up for further proceedings on 29.07.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/16.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    09 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 966/24
    KISHOR KUMAR Vs. MAHESH alias RINKU
    09.01.2025
    Present: Sh. Uttam Kumar Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with
    plaintiff.
    Sh. D K Pandey, ld. Counsel for the defendant.
    In between the dates of hearings, defendant has filed an
    application for leave to defend.
    Defendant is directed to supply the copy of leave to defend to
    plaintiff within 15 days from today.
    To come up for reply, if any/ arguments on leave to defend on
    16.04.2025.
    (Ajay Singh Parihar)
    ACJ-cum-ARC/North
    Rohini Court/09.01.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    04 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: CS No. 966/2024.
    Kishore Kumar VS Mahesh @ Rinku.
    04.09.2024
    Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
    registered.
    Present: Sh. P K Poddar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Heard. File perused.
    Issue summons of the suit, as provided under Order XXXVII
    CPC, to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within 15 days returnable on
    09.01.2025.
    (Manish Jain)
    ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North
    Rohini Court-04.09.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.