RAJKUMARIVsRAJKUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
04.04.2026
Present: Son of plaintiff.
Shri R.S Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant and Ld.
counsel for proposed defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application u/o 1
rule 10 CPC.
An application u/s 151 CPC has been filed on behalf
of proposed defendant for filing of certain documents relating to
ownership of the suit property. Copy supplied.
Adjournment sought on behalf of plaintiff on the
ground that his counsel is not available today.
Heard. Allowed.
Put up for purpose fixed on 02.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/04.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. SK Jha, Ld. Counsel for proposed defendant.
Sh. RS Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order I
Rule 10 CPC
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for proposed Defendant that
he is owner of suit property by virtue of certain documents. However, no
documents have been filed with the application.
Time sought on behalf of the proposed Defendant to file
certain documents. Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for arguments on application for
condonation of delay / further proceedings on 04.04.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
27.10.2025
Present: None for plaintiff
Sh. RS Pandit, Ld. Counsel for defendant and proposed
Defendant.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
I Rule 10 CPC
No reply has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff till date.
Accordingly, right to file the same is hereby closed.
One opportunity is given to the plaintiff to address
arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC failing which
appropriate orders will be passed.
Put up the matter for arguments on 14.01.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/27.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
23.07.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. RS Pandit and Sh. SK Jha, Ld. Counsel for defendant
and for proposed Defendant.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
I Rule 10 CPC.
An application for condonation of delay in filing WS filed.
Same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to the
opposite party. Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH.
Plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of non
availability of main counsel being unwell. Taking a lenient view, the
same is allowed.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 27.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7CS SCJ901/24RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
22.04.2025
Present: Shri Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff
Shri S.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for defendant and proposed
defendant.
Application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the
proposed defendant. Copy supplied.
Let reply of the same be filed on or before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite side.
Be taken up on 23.07.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
29.01.2025
Present: None for plaintiff
Ms. Sadhna, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendant. Same
is taken on record.
WS filed on behalf of the Defendant along with reply to
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC. Copy of the same
has been supplied to the opposite party.
Perusal of the case file shows that the same is belated. Let
application for condonation of delay be filed which shall be decided on
its own merits.
Be taken up on 22.04.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/29.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
Orders are not digitally signed as digital key is yet to be obtained.
11.11.2024
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff with Plaintiff in
person.
Sh. Jaikumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant with Defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendant. Taken
on record.
Defendant seeks some time to file WS. Let the same be
filed within the stipulated time.
Be taken up on 29.01.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/11.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
09.10.2024
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff
Defendant yet to be summoned.
Deficit court fee was filed on 08.10.2024.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the application
under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, if any, to the defendant in the
prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken within one
week.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff presses his
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking to restrain
the Defedant from creating third party interest in the suit property.
Plaintiff has claimed to be owner of the suit property. However, the
documents, i.e., GPA, ATS etc. do not confer ownership. No other
document to corroborate the ownership is filed. Accordingly, the request
is denied.
List on 11.11.2024.
Copy dasti.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 41CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
23.08.2024
Present: Sh. Kailash Kishore, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff has sought some time to file
appropriate Court fee. Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 09.10.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
14.08.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: None.
List for consideration on 23.08.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJ KUMARI Vs. RAJ KUMAR
02.07.2026
Present: Shri Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for the plaintiff
(Through VC)
Shri S.K Jha and R.S Pandit, Ld. Counsel for the
proposed defendant as well as defendant no. 1.
Matter is listed for arguments on application u/o 1
rule 10 CPC.
Arguments heard.
Put up for orders on 03.09.2026
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/02.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
04.04.2026
Present: Son of plaintiff.
Shri R.S Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant and Ld.
counsel for proposed defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application u/o 1
rule 10 CPC.
An application u/s 151 CPC has been filed on behalf
of proposed defendant for filing of certain documents relating to
ownership of the suit property. Copy supplied.
Adjournment sought on behalf of plaintiff on the
ground that his counsel is not available today.
Heard. Allowed.
Put up for purpose fixed on 02.07.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/04.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff (Through VC)
Sh. SK Jha, Ld. Counsel for proposed defendant.
Sh. RS Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order I
Rule 10 CPC
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for proposed Defendant that
he is owner of suit property by virtue of certain documents. However, no
documents have been filed with the application.
Time sought on behalf of the proposed Defendant to file
certain documents. Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for arguments on application for
condonation of delay / further proceedings on 04.04.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
27.10.2025
Present: None for plaintiff
Sh. RS Pandit, Ld. Counsel for defendant and proposed
Defendant.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
I Rule 10 CPC
No reply has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff till date.
Accordingly, right to file the same is hereby closed.
One opportunity is given to the plaintiff to address
arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC failing which
appropriate orders will be passed.
Put up the matter for arguments on 14.01.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/27.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
23.07.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. RS Pandit and Sh. SK Jha, Ld. Counsel for defendant
and for proposed Defendant.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
I Rule 10 CPC.
An application for condonation of delay in filing WS filed.
Same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to the
opposite party. Reply, if any, be filed by NDOH.
Plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of non
availability of main counsel being unwell. Taking a lenient view, the
same is allowed.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 27.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7CS SCJ901/24RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
22.04.2025
Present: Shri Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff
Shri S.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for defendant and proposed
defendant.
Application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the
proposed defendant. Copy supplied.
Let reply of the same be filed on or before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite side.
Be taken up on 23.07.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/22.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
29.01.2025
Present: None for plaintiff
Ms. Sadhna, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendant. Same
is taken on record.
WS filed on behalf of the Defendant along with reply to
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC. Copy of the same
has been supplied to the opposite party.
Perusal of the case file shows that the same is belated. Let
application for condonation of delay be filed which shall be decided on
its own merits.
Be taken up on 22.04.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/29.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
Orders are not digitally signed as digital key is yet to be obtained.
11.11.2024
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff with Plaintiff in
person.
Sh. Jaikumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant with Defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendant. Taken
on record.
Defendant seeks some time to file WS. Let the same be
filed within the stipulated time.
Be taken up on 29.01.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/11.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
09.10.2024
Present: Sh. Nirmal Kishore, Ld. LAC for plaintiff
Defendant yet to be summoned.
Deficit court fee was filed on 08.10.2024.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the application
under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, if any, to the defendant in the
prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken within one
week.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff presses his
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking to restrain
the Defedant from creating third party interest in the suit property.
Plaintiff has claimed to be owner of the suit property. However, the
documents, i.e., GPA, ATS etc. do not confer ownership. No other
document to corroborate the ownership is filed. Accordingly, the request
is denied.
List on 11.11.2024.
Copy dasti.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/09.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 41CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
`
23.08.2024
Present: Sh. Kailash Kishore, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff has sought some time to file
appropriate Court fee. Heard. Allowed.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 09.10.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ901/24
RAJKUMARI Vs. RAJKUMAR
14.08.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: None.
List for consideration on 23.08.2024.
(PRITU RAJ)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --