TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 01-07-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2023 Date: 10-07-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2023 Date: 19-07-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2023 Date: 18-08-2023 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2023 Date: 04-09-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 27-09-2023 Date: 27-09-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2023 Date: 29-11-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 07-02-2024 Date: 07-02-2024 Business: arg Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2024 Date: 02-05-2024 Business: arg Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2024 Date: 27-07-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2024 Date: 29-08-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2024 Date: 07-11-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Order on Application Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2024 Date: 12-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2025 Date: 27-02-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2025 Date: 03-06-2025 Business: Listed for misc. arguments. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2025 Date: 07-08-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2025 Date: 25-09-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2025 Date: 04-12-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Plaintiff / Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2026 Date: 19-03-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Plaintiff / Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 21-05-2026 Date: 21-05-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Plaintiff / Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2026 Date: 03-09-2026 Business: m Next Purpose: Plaintiff / Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2027
Filing Number: 1302/2023 Filing Date: 24-06-2023 First Hearing Date: 01st July 2023 Court Number And Judge: 566-Civil Judge
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 19.03.2026 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Shruti Sharma, proxy counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3. D-1 is already deleted from array of parties. List of witnesses filed alongwith evidence affidavit of PW-1 as well as certificate under Section 63- of BSA and amended memo of parties on behalf of plaintiff. Copy supplied. Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to file application for amending memo of parties. Another application under Section 151 CPC r/w Section 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC has been filed by the plaintiff. Copy supplied. Reply, if any, to the said application be filed by the defendants with advance copy to the opposite party. Between the intervening dates, list of witnesses on behalf of D-2 and D-3 has been filed. However, the matter is at the stage of PE. Ld. proxy counsel for defendants seeks some time to take instruction from the main counsel regarding filing of list of witnesses. Put up for PE/reply, if any, to the aforesaid application/further proceedings on 21.05.2026. (SAKSHI JAISWAL) CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH ROHINI/DELHI/19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 04.12.2025 Present: Sh. Bhoomit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff D-1 deleted from array of parties. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3 (Through VC). Matter is listed for filing of amended memo of parties. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file the same. Heard. Allowed. Admission/denial of document not pressed for. Pleadings are now complete. Accordingly following issues are framed:- I) Whether the Defendants are raising illegal construction over the suit property and blocking access of plaintiff? OPP. II) Whether the plaintiff has no locus standii to file the present suit? OPD. III) Whether the Defendant is owner of suit property, as claimed? OPD. IV) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction, as prayed? OPP. No other issue is pressed or arises. Matter be taken up for PE on 19.03.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be supplied to the opposite party at least 10 days prior to the next date of hearing. List of witnesses be filed by both the parties within 15 days from today. (RENU) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/04.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 07.08.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3. Argument heard on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for D-1 that D-1 is living at the rear portion of the suit property and is the owner of that portion. It is…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. On 12.12.2024, time was sought on behalf of the Plaintiff to file reply to application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. However today, it is stated by Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff that they do not wish to file reply and wish to straightaway argue. Accordingly, be taken up on 07.08.2025. (RENU) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/03.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7CS SCJ667/23SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 27.02.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Defendant-1 and 2 in person. None for the remaining defendants. Adjournment is sought on behalf of the Plaintiff on the ground that brother of main counsel has expired. Heard. Allowed. Be taken up on 03.06.2025. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 50 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 12.12.2024 ` Present: Sh. Sudeep Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintif. D-1 in person. None for the defendant2 and 3. Matter is listed for orders / clarifications on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Clarifications sought from Plaintiff. Plaintiff further wishes to file reply to application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Heard. Allowed. Plaintiff, D1 and D2 are directed to appear in person for NDOH. Be taken up on 27.02.2025. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/12.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM Orders are not digitally signed as digital key is yet to be obtained. 07.11.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff with Plaintiff in person. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1 with Defendant-1 in person. None for the defendant2 and 3. Arguments heard on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the Defendant1. Be taken up for orders / clarifications on 12.12.2024. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/07.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 29.08.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. None for the defendant2 and 3. Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of main counsel. Same is not opposed to by Ld. Counsel for defendant. Be taken up for filing of reply / arguments on 07.11.2024. Date is given as per joint convenience of the parties. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/29.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM As informed by the reader, VC of this Court is not functioning since morning. The same has been intimated to the computer branch. 27.07.2024 Present: Sh. Sudeep Shokeen and Ms. Sonam Dass, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant1 with D1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant2 and 3. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for defendant1 that he has no concern with the suit property. A separate statement of the D1 is also recorded to the said effect. Be taken up for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC on 29.08.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 02.05.2024 Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3. Perusal of the case file shows that an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was filed by the Defendant on 30.06.2023. Arguments heard on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Vide a separate order of even date, the application stands dismissed. Be taken up for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed by D1 on 27.07.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/02.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ORDER 02.05.2024 1. Vide this order, I will dispose of an application under Order VII Rule 11 r/w Section 151 CPC for rejection of plaint on behalf of defendant1. 2. The facts from which the present application arises in brief as per the plaint is that the subject matter of the suit is a gali which is situated at towards the south of house of the…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 07.02.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, no. D-6004/21 Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for MCD. None for the defendant2 and 3. Ld Proxy Counsel for Plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of main counsel. Taking a lenient view, the same is allowed. Since the status report has been filed on behalf of the MCD, Ld. Counsel for MCD is accordingly discharged. Matter be taken up on 02.05.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/07.02.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 35 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 29.11.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant2 and 3. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the MCD with Sh. Devraj Chowdhary, AE, MCD in person. Status report filed. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite side. Both parties seeks some time to go through the status report. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 07.02.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/29.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 35 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 27.09.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff None for defendant1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant2 and 3. Sh. Devraj, AE, MCD in person. Status report filed by Sh. Devraj. Same is taken on record. WS filed on behalf of the defendant2 and 3. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite side. However, the same has been filed on behalf of Sh. Devraj which is in conflict with his statement recorded on 18.08.2023. Moreover, the court notice was directed to be issued in terms of previous order for filing of the detailed status report by the Commissioner, MCD, Narela Zone, Delhi. The status report which has been filed today has not been filed on behalf of the aforesaid authority. However, Sh. Devraj has stated that the main counsel could not appear today and requests for an adjournment. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 29.11.2023. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.09.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 04.09.2023 AT 4 PM Present: None. Vide a separate order of even date, Application u/O I R 10 CPC is partly allowed qua Defendants Rashid and Umed and Defendants Rashid, Umed Ali are hereby impleaded as D-2 and 3 respectively whereas the same is kept pending as regards proposed Defendant MCD as there is a discrepancy between the statement made by the AR appearing on…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 60 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM One of the regular stenographers of this Court is on Child Care Leave and no substitute stenographer has been provided. 18.08.2023 AT 2 PM Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for the Defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants namely Rasid and Umed. Sh. Devraj, AE, MCD, Narela in person. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld.…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 19.07.2023 AT 11.30 AM Present: Sh. Dev Raj Chowdhary, AE, MCD, Narela in person. He is apprised that the matter is scheduled to be fixed up for 2 PM. Accordingly, be taken up at 2 PM. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/19.07.2023 AT 2 PM Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants Rasid and Umed. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendant MCD. Fresh vakalatmana filed on behalf of the proposed defendant. Same is taken on record. Report not filed. Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendant MCD seeks some more time to file report in terms of the previous order. Let the same be filed by NDOH with an advance copy to the opposite side. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 18.08.2023 at 2 PM. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/19.07.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 10.07.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants namely Rasid and Umed. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for propsoed Defendant namely MCD. Reply filed to Application u/O I R 10 CPC and Application u/O VI R 17 CPC by the proposed Defendants. Copy of the same has been supplied…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 01.07.2023 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. None for the defendants. A perusal of the record reveals that two applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant is pending disposal. Today, applications under Section 80 (2) CPC, under Order I Rule 10 (2) for impleading Rashid, Umed Ali and NDMC as defendants alongwith an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint have been filed. Applications are taken on record. Copy of the same be served upon the opposite party, who will be at liberty to file reply to the same alongwith advance copy. Matter be taken up on 10.07.2023. Shorter date is given on the ground of urgency as prayed on behalf of the plaintiff. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/01.07.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 19.03.2026 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Shruti Sharma, proxy counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3. D-1 is already deleted from array of parties. List of witnesses filed alongwith evidence affidavit of PW-1 as well as certificate under Section 63- of BSA and amended memo of parties on behalf of plaintiff. Copy supplied. Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to file application for amending memo of parties. Another application under Section 151 CPC r/w Section 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC has been filed by the plaintiff. Copy supplied. Reply, if any, to the said application be filed by the defendants with advance copy to the opposite party. Between the intervening dates, list of witnesses on behalf of D-2 and D-3 has been filed. However, the matter is at the stage of PE. Ld. proxy counsel for defendants seeks some time to take instruction from the main counsel regarding filing of list of witnesses. Put up for PE/reply, if any, to the aforesaid application/further proceedings on 21.05.2026. (SAKSHI JAISWAL) CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH ROHINI/DELHI/19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 04.12.2025 Present: Sh. Bhoomit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff D-1 deleted from array of parties. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3 (Through VC). Matter is listed for filing of amended memo of parties. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file the same. Heard. Allowed. Admission/denial of document not pressed for. Pleadings are now complete. Accordingly following issues are framed:- I) Whether the Defendants are raising illegal construction over the suit property and blocking access of plaintiff? OPP. II) Whether the plaintiff has no locus standii to file the present suit? OPD. III) Whether the Defendant is owner of suit property, as claimed? OPD. IV) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction, as prayed? OPP. No other issue is pressed or arises. Matter be taken up for PE on 19.03.2026. Advance copy of affidavit be supplied to the opposite party at least 10 days prior to the next date of hearing. List of witnesses be filed by both the parties within 15 days from today. (RENU) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/04.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 07.08.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3. Argument heard on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for D-1 that D-1 is living at the rear portion of the suit property and is the owner of that portion. It is…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. On 12.12.2024, time was sought on behalf of the Plaintiff to file reply to application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. However today, it is stated by Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff that they do not wish to file reply and wish to straightaway argue. Accordingly, be taken up on 07.08.2025. (RENU) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/03.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7CS SCJ667/23SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 27.02.2025 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Defendant-1 and 2 in person. None for the remaining defendants. Adjournment is sought on behalf of the Plaintiff on the ground that brother of main counsel has expired. Heard. Allowed. Be taken up on 03.06.2025. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 50 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 12.12.2024 ` Present: Sh. Sudeep Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintif. D-1 in person. None for the defendant2 and 3. Matter is listed for orders / clarifications on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Clarifications sought from Plaintiff. Plaintiff further wishes to file reply to application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Heard. Allowed. Plaintiff, D1 and D2 are directed to appear in person for NDOH. Be taken up on 27.02.2025. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/12.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM Orders are not digitally signed as digital key is yet to be obtained. 07.11.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff with Plaintiff in person. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1 with Defendant-1 in person. None for the defendant2 and 3. Arguments heard on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the Defendant1. Be taken up for orders / clarifications on 12.12.2024. (ANKITA BHATIA) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/07.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 29.08.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. None for the defendant2 and 3. Matter is listed for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of main counsel. Same is not opposed to by Ld. Counsel for defendant. Be taken up for filing of reply / arguments on 07.11.2024. Date is given as per joint convenience of the parties. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/29.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM As informed by the reader, VC of this Court is not functioning since morning. The same has been intimated to the computer branch. 27.07.2024 Present: Sh. Sudeep Shokeen and Ms. Sonam Dass, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant1 with D1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant2 and 3. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for defendant1 that he has no concern with the suit property. A separate statement of the D1 is also recorded to the said effect. Be taken up for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC on 29.08.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 02.05.2024 Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-2 and 3. Perusal of the case file shows that an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was filed by the Defendant on 30.06.2023. Arguments heard on application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Vide a separate order of even date, the application stands dismissed. Be taken up for arguments on application under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed by D1 on 27.07.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/02.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ORDER 02.05.2024 1. Vide this order, I will dispose of an application under Order VII Rule 11 r/w Section 151 CPC for rejection of plaint on behalf of defendant1. 2. The facts from which the present application arises in brief as per the plaint is that the subject matter of the suit is a gali which is situated at towards the south of house of the…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 07.02.2024 Present: Sh. Bhumit Malik, no. D-6004/21 Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for MCD. None for the defendant2 and 3. Ld Proxy Counsel for Plaintiff seeks an adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of main counsel. Taking a lenient view, the same is allowed. Since the status report has been filed on behalf of the MCD, Ld. Counsel for MCD is accordingly discharged. Matter be taken up on 02.05.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/07.02.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 35 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 29.11.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant2 and 3. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the MCD with Sh. Devraj Chowdhary, AE, MCD in person. Status report filed. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite side. Both parties seeks some time to go through the status report. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 07.02.2024. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/29.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 35 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM ` 27.09.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff None for defendant1. Sh. Nitin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant2 and 3. Sh. Devraj, AE, MCD in person. Status report filed by Sh. Devraj. Same is taken on record. WS filed on behalf of the defendant2 and 3. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite side. However, the same has been filed on behalf of Sh. Devraj which is in conflict with his statement recorded on 18.08.2023. Moreover, the court notice was directed to be issued in terms of previous order for filing of the detailed status report by the Commissioner, MCD, Narela Zone, Delhi. The status report which has been filed today has not been filed on behalf of the aforesaid authority. However, Sh. Devraj has stated that the main counsel could not appear today and requests for an adjournment. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 29.11.2023. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/27.09.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 04.09.2023 AT 4 PM Present: None. Vide a separate order of even date, Application u/O I R 10 CPC is partly allowed qua Defendants Rashid and Umed and Defendants Rashid, Umed Ali are hereby impleaded as D-2 and 3 respectively whereas the same is kept pending as regards proposed Defendant MCD as there is a discrepancy between the statement made by the AR appearing on…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 60 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM One of the regular stenographers of this Court is on Child Care Leave and no substitute stenographer has been provided. 18.08.2023 AT 2 PM Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for the Defendant-1. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants namely Rasid and Umed. Sh. Devraj, AE, MCD, Narela in person. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld.…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 19.07.2023 AT 11.30 AM Present: Sh. Dev Raj Chowdhary, AE, MCD, Narela in person. He is apprised that the matter is scheduled to be fixed up for 2 PM. Accordingly, be taken up at 2 PM. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/19.07.2023 AT 2 PM Present: Sh. Sudhir Showkeen, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants Rasid and Umed. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendant MCD. Fresh vakalatmana filed on behalf of the proposed defendant. Same is taken on record. Report not filed. Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendant MCD seeks some more time to file report in terms of the previous order. Let the same be filed by NDOH with an advance copy to the opposite side. Put up the matter for further proceedings on 18.08.2023 at 2 PM. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/19.07.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 10.07.2023 Present: Sh. Sudhir Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh SS Parashar, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Sh. Nitin Chowdhary, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendants namely Rasid and Umed. Ms. Suman Pandey, Ld. Counsel for propsoed Defendant namely MCD. Reply filed to Application u/O I R 10 CPC and Application u/O VI R 17 CPC by the proposed Defendants. Copy of the same has been supplied…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ667/23 SINU Vs. NASEEM 01.07.2023 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Sudhir Shokeen, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. None for the defendants. A perusal of the record reveals that two applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant is pending disposal. Today, applications under Section 80 (2) CPC, under Order I Rule 10 (2) for impleading Rashid, Umed Ali and NDMC as defendants alongwith an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint have been filed. Applications are taken on record. Copy of the same be served upon the opposite party, who will be at liberty to file reply to the same alongwith advance copy. Matter be taken up on 10.07.2023. Shorter date is given on the ground of urgency as prayed on behalf of the plaintiff. (PRITU RAJ) CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH) ROHINI/DELHI/01.07.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
