Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

M/S MAHARANI GEMS PVT LTDVsSUKHWINDER KAUR

CNR DLNT030012042024427-ACJ CUM ARC
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--REJECTED
Decision Date: 25th July 2024

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
782/2024
Registration Date
18 Jul 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1M/S MAHARANI GEMS PVT LTD

    Respondent

    1. 1SUKHWINDER KAUR

    Acts & Sections

    1
    --- · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-07-2024
Business: f
Next Purpose: Order/Judgement
Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2024

Date: 25-07-2024
Business: rr
Nature Of Disposal: REJECTED
Disposal Date: 25-07-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1196/2024
Filing Date: 15-07-2024
eFiling Number: ADL20230012067C202400007
eFiling Date: 12-07-2024
First Hearing Date: 18th July 2024
Decision Date: 25th July 2024
Court Number And Judge: 427-ACJ CUM ARC

    Orders

    3
    Final Order 2Full order available
    25 Jul 2024

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 782/24 M/s Maharani Gems Pvt Ltd Vs. Sukhwinder Kaur -1/2- 25.07.2024 Present: Ms. Pooja Kohli, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Briefly stated, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to sell qua property bearing no. Flat No. 23, First Floor, Block D-1, Model Town Area, Village Malkapur, Chhalni, Delhi-09 for a consideration amount of Rs 3.2 crore. It is submitted by the plaintiff that an amount of Rs 1,04,64,200/- has…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    18 Jul 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS SCJ No. 782/2024.
M/s Maharani Gems Pvt Ltd. VS Sukhwinder.
18.07.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel that agreement to sell was
executed between the parties. It is further submitted that an apprehension
exists that the defendant may sale the property in question. Accordingly, it
is prayed that interim protection be granted restraining the defendant from
creating any third party interest in the property in question.
A doubt has been raised regarding the maintainability of the
suit in the present form.
Ld. Counsel has relied upon a judgment titled as Sucha Singh
Sodhi (D) through LRs Vs Baldev Raj Walia cited in AIR 2018 SC 2241.
Arguments heard.
To come up for orders on 25.07.2024.
(Manish Jain)
ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North
Rohini Court-18.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    18 Jul 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS SCJ No. 782/2024.
M/s Maharani Gems Pvt Ltd. VS Sukhwinder.
18.07.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel that agreement to sell was
executed between the parties. It is further submitted that an apprehension
exists that the defendant may sale the property in question. Accordingly, it
is prayed that interim protection be granted restraining the defendant from
creating any third party interest in the property in question.
A doubt has been raised regarding the maintainability of the
suit in the present form.
Ld. Counsel has relied upon a judgment titled as Sucha Singh
Sodhi (D) through LRs Vs Baldev Raj Walia cited in AIR 2018 SC 2241.
Arguments heard.
To come up for orders on 25.07.2024.
(Manish Jain)
ACJ-CCJ-ARC-North
Rohini Court-18.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.