Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

Canara BankVsRASHMI JAIN

CNR DLNT030011012026566-Civil Judge
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
738/2026
Registration Date
08 Jun 2026
Next Hearing Date
09 Feb 2027
Case Stage
Misc. cases / purpose

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Canara Bank

    Respondent

    1. 1RASHMI JAIN

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Recovery of Money · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-06-2026
Business: f
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2026

Date: 29-08-2026
Business: m
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2026

Date: 25-09-2026
Business: m
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2026

Date: 10-10-2026
Business: M
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1104/2026
Filing Date: 05-06-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230010010C202600043
eFiling Date: 05-06-2026
First Hearing Date: 08th June 2026
Court Number And Judge: 566-Civil Judge

    Orders

    6
    Interim Order 3
    10 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS SCJ 738/26
CANARA BANK Vs. RASHMI JAIN
10.10.2026
In view of Notification no. 100/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC,
Dated 09.10.2026 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, no adverse
order shall be passed.
Present: Ms. Chitra Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(Through VC)
Defendant is yet to be summoned.
Between the intervening dates, An application for
substitution of AR of plaintiff alongwith copy of GPA filed.
The application is perused and same is allowed.
Accordingly, Ms. Ritu Kulshrestha is substituted as the AR of the
plaintiff company.
Between the intervening dates, an application u/o 6
rule 17 CPC is filed on behalf of the plaintiff for amendment of
plaint.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Vide present application, the plaintiff seeks to add
valuation clause in the plaint. Considering the nature of
amendment and the fact that defendant is yet to be summoned,
the application is allowed. Amended plaint is taken on record.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps
be taken within one week.
Put up on 09.02.2027.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/10.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    25 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 45 CS SCJ738/26
CANARA BANK Vs. RASHMI JAIN
25.09.2026
Present: Ms. Chitra Malhotra, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
(Through VC).
Heard.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to amend
the plaint so as to include valuation clause.
Put up on 10.10.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/25.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    08 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 738/26
Canara Bank Vs. Rashmi Jain
08.06.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: None.
The present matter has been filed through electronic
mode. Plaintiff is directed to file hard copy of the plaint
alongwith documents before the next date of the hearing.
Matter be taken up for consideration on 29.08.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    10 Oct 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS SCJ 738/26
CANARA BANK Vs. RASHMI JAIN
10.10.2026
In view of Notification no. 100/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC,
Dated 09.10.2026 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, no adverse
order shall be passed.
Present: Ms. Chitra Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(Through VC)
Defendant is yet to be summoned.
Between the intervening dates, An application for
substitution of AR of plaintiff alongwith copy of GPA filed.
The application is perused and same is allowed.
Accordingly, Ms. Ritu Kulshrestha is substituted as the AR of the
plaintiff company.
Between the intervening dates, an application u/o 6
rule 17 CPC is filed on behalf of the plaintiff for amendment of
plaint.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Vide present application, the plaintiff seeks to add
valuation clause in the plaint. Considering the nature of
amendment and the fact that defendant is yet to be summoned,
the application is allowed. Amended plaint is taken on record.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps
be taken within one week.
Put up on 09.02.2027.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/10.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    25 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 45 CS SCJ738/26
CANARA BANK Vs. RASHMI JAIN
25.09.2026
Present: Ms. Chitra Malhotra, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
(Through VC).
Heard.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to amend
the plaint so as to include valuation clause.
Put up on 10.10.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/25.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    08 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 738/26
Canara Bank Vs. Rashmi Jain
08.06.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: None.
The present matter has been filed through electronic
mode. Plaintiff is directed to file hard copy of the plaint
alongwith documents before the next date of the hearing.
Matter be taken up for consideration on 29.08.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.