SARITAVsM/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS. +2 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
26.05.2026
Present: Shri Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Roshan Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for all the
defendants.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to the application
of defendant u/s 5 of Limitation Act for condonotion of delay in
filing of appearance and u/o 37 rule 3 CPC.
Reply filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that previous
cost of Rs. 2000/ has been paid by the defendant.
Put up for arguments on said application on
01.09.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/26.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
26.05.2026
Present: Shri Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Shri Roshan Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for all the
defendants.
Matter is listed for filing of reply to the application
of defendant u/s 5 of Limitation Act for condonotion of delay in
filing of appearance and u/o 37 rule 3 CPC.
Reply filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that previous
cost of Rs. 2000/ has been paid by the defendant.
Put up for arguments on said application on
01.09.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/26.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
19.03.2026
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for all the
defendants (Through VC).
An application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has
been filed on behalf of plaintiff for condoning the delay in filing
appearance alongwith application under Order 37 Rule 3 CPC for
entering appearance. Copy has been supplied. Reply, if any, to the
aforesaid application be filed during the course of day.
Ld. counsel for defendants submits that previous cost of
Rs. 2,000/- will be paid during the course of the day,
Put up for further proceedings on 26.05.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/19.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
19.03.2026
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for all the
defendants (Through VC).
An application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has
been filed on behalf of plaintiff for condoning the delay in filing
appearance alongwith application under Order 37 Rule 3 CPC for
entering appearance. Copy has been supplied. Reply, if any, to the
aforesaid application be filed during the course of day.
Ld. counsel for defendants submits that previous cost of
Rs. 2,000/- will be paid during the course of the day,
Put up for further proceedings on 26.05.2026.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE/NORTH
ROHINI/DELHI/19.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 41CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
`
31.10.2025
Present: Sh. Vishal Vashishth, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Girish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC).
Matter is listed for Judgment.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant that he has
been recently engaged in the present matter and he has e-filed an
application for leave to defend and application for condonation of delay
in filing of leave to defend and also an application under Section 151
CPC and will submit hard copy in the Court.
Considering the request, put up the matter for further
proceedings on 03.02.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/31.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 41CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
`
31.10.2025
Present: Sh. Vishal Vashishth, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Girish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant (Through VC).
Matter is listed for Judgment.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant that he has
been recently engaged in the present matter and he has e-filed an
application for leave to defend and application for condonation of delay
in filing of leave to defend and also an application under Section 151
CPC and will submit hard copy in the Court.
Considering the request, put up the matter for further
proceedings on 03.02.2026.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/31.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
`
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Plaintiff in person.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-1 received back
unserved with the report that the office is closed for last 5-6 months.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-3 received back
unserved with the report of refusal. I consider this to be proper service.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-2 received back
duly served on 19.07.2025 through his wife. However till date, none
has entered appearance on behalf of the Defendant-2.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that service of
D-1 may be deemed served as D-2 is director of D-1. Accordingly, D-2
is deemed served through D-2.
Considering that none has entered appearance nor filed
leave to Defend on behalf of Defendants, Plaintiff is entitled to
Judgment.
Put up the matter for Judgment / clarifications, if any on
31.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/06.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
`
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Plaintiff in person.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-1 received back
unserved with the report that the office is closed for last 5-6 months.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-3 received back
unserved with the report of refusal. I consider this to be proper service.
Process in terms of previous order qua D-2 received back
duly served on 19.07.2025 through his wife. However till date, none
has entered appearance on behalf of the Defendant-2.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that service of
D-1 may be deemed served as D-2 is director of D-1. Accordingly, D-2
is deemed served through D-2.
Considering that none has entered appearance nor filed
leave to Defend on behalf of Defendants, Plaintiff is entitled to
Judgment.
Put up the matter for Judgment / clarifications, if any on
31.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/06.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
05.07.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Heard, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue special summons of the suit to the defendant in the
prescribed format on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken within one week.
List on 06.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 682/25
SARITA Vs. M/S METAS AGRO PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
05.07.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Heard, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Issue special summons of the suit to the defendant in the
prescribed format on filing of PF/RC. Steps be taken within one week.
List on 06.10.2025.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/05.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --