Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

SMT. RAJWANTI +4 moreVsSMT. SUSHMA

CNR DLNT030009462026530-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
630/2026
Registration Date
20 May 2026
Next Hearing Date
02 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc. cases / purpose

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    6

    Petitioner

    1. 1SMT. RAJWANTI
    2. 2Saraswati Devi
    3. 3KESHAR
    4. 4ROSHNI DEVI
    5. 5PARMESHWAREE

    Respondent

    1. 1SMT. SUSHMA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Permanent Injuction · Sec 37and38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-05-2026
Business: CONSD.
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2026

Date: 02-06-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2026

Date: 10-07-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2026

Date: 05-08-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 947/2026
Filing Date: 18-05-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230004606C202600082
eFiling Date: 16-05-2026
First Hearing Date: 20th May 2026
Court Number And Judge: 530-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge

    Orders

    8
    Interim Order 4
    05 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS SCJ 630/26
SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA
05.08.2026
Present: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. (through VC)
Matter is listed on the aspect of valuation of the suit in terms of order dated
02.06.2026.
It is clearly noticed that the present suit is not properly valued for the
purpose of jurisdiction as well as for the purpose of court fees. It is also observed by the
court that the pleadings are insufficient as the measurement has not been mentioned.
Plaintiff was granted two weeks for proper valuation vide order dated
02.06.2026 and time was again granted vide order dated 10.07.2026. However, plaintiff
has failed to do the needful.
Let it be done within two days from today at request of Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff, failing which the suit shall be rejected alongwith cost of Rs.20,000/-.
Be adjourned for 02.11.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ (North)
Rohini Courts, Delhi
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    10 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA
10.07.2026
Present: Sh. Kamal Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
The plaintiff has not complied with the
previous order. Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff submits that
main counsel is occupied in some other court and seeks
adjournment.
In the circumstances of the case, plaintiff is
granted 15 days time to comply the previous order, failing
which appropriate orders U/o 7 rule 11 CPC shall be
passed.
Be put up for 05.08.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/10.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    02 Jun 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA 02.06.2026 Present: Sh. Kamal Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff through VC. The plaintiff has moved an application under Section 9 CPC, assailing the observations recorded in the order dated 20.05.2026 and seeking issuance of summons. Reliance has been placed upon the Full Bench judgment in Shiela Devi v. Kishan Lal Kalra, ILR (1974) II Delhi (FB) 491, to contend that the plaintiff is…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    20 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ NO.630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI VS SMT. SUSHMA
20.05.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-mode.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Bharat Gupta Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Heard.
It is noted that the present suit has been filed
seeking a relief of partition in the suit property bearing
address as H.No.1122, Village Bawana, Delhi. It is further
noted that the plaintiff has not mentioned the area of the
property in the pleadings and the valuation for the purpose of
court fee and jurisdiction is valued at Rs.2.5 lacs. In the
absence of pleadings regarding the measurement of the suit
property, it is not ascertainable that the valuation is correct or
not.
The plaintiff is thus directed to make necessary
amendments in the pleadings.
Be put up for consideration on 02.06.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    05 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS SCJ 630/26
SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA
05.08.2026
Present: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. (through VC)
Matter is listed on the aspect of valuation of the suit in terms of order dated
02.06.2026.
It is clearly noticed that the present suit is not properly valued for the
purpose of jurisdiction as well as for the purpose of court fees. It is also observed by the
court that the pleadings are insufficient as the measurement has not been mentioned.
Plaintiff was granted two weeks for proper valuation vide order dated
02.06.2026 and time was again granted vide order dated 10.07.2026. However, plaintiff
has failed to do the needful.
Let it be done within two days from today at request of Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff, failing which the suit shall be rejected alongwith cost of Rs.20,000/-.
Be adjourned for 02.11.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ (North)
Rohini Courts, Delhi
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    10 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA
10.07.2026
Present: Sh. Kamal Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
The plaintiff has not complied with the
previous order. Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff submits that
main counsel is occupied in some other court and seeks
adjournment.
In the circumstances of the case, plaintiff is
granted 15 days time to comply the previous order, failing
which appropriate orders U/o 7 rule 11 CPC shall be
passed.
Be put up for 05.08.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/10.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2Full order available
    02 Jun 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI Vs. SMT. SUSHMA 02.06.2026 Present: Sh. Kamal Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff through VC. The plaintiff has moved an application under Section 9 CPC, assailing the observations recorded in the order dated 20.05.2026 and seeking issuance of summons. Reliance has been placed upon the Full Bench judgment in Shiela Devi v. Kishan Lal Kalra, ILR (1974) II Delhi (FB) 491, to contend that the plaintiff is…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1
    20 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ NO.630/26 SMT. RAJWANTI VS SMT. SUSHMA
20.05.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-mode.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Bharat Gupta Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Heard.
It is noted that the present suit has been filed
seeking a relief of partition in the suit property bearing
address as H.No.1122, Village Bawana, Delhi. It is further
noted that the plaintiff has not mentioned the area of the
property in the pleadings and the valuation for the purpose of
court fee and jurisdiction is valued at Rs.2.5 lacs. In the
absence of pleadings regarding the measurement of the suit
property, it is not ascertainable that the valuation is correct or
not.
The plaintiff is thus directed to make necessary
amendments in the pleadings.
Be put up for consideration on 02.06.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.