Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

SANJAY GUPTAVsMANOJ AGGARWAL

CNR DLNT030006892026566-Civil Judge
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
467/2026
Registration Date
17 Apr 2026
Next Hearing Date
04 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Final Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SANJAY GUPTA

    Respondent

    1. 1MANOJ AGGARWAL

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Permanent Injuction · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-04-2026
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2026

Date: 20-08-2026
Business: m
Next Purpose: Final Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 689/2026
Filing Date: 15-04-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20230002992C202600009
eFiling Date: 13-04-2026
First Hearing Date: 17th April 2026
Court Number And Judge: 566-Civil Judge

    Orders

    4
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    20 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 467/26 SANJAY GUPTA Vs. MANOJ AGGARWAL 20.08.2026 Present: Shri Ravinder Malik, Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Shri Ankur, Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 (Through VC). Summons issued to D-2 to D-5 received back served. Between the intervening dates, WS alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing WS and reply to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. Copy supplied.…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 59 CS SCJ 467/26
SANJAY GUPTA Vs. MANOJ AGGARWAL
17.04.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Shri Jassimran Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps
be taken within one week.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff request
that the status quo may be maintained and the defendants may be
restrained from entering in the suit property till NDOH. Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon a registered sale deed in
the favour of plaintiff.
Considering the submission and the fact that the suit
of plaintiff is for permanent injunction and that if ad-interim
injunction is not granted, plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss.
Accordingly, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo
till NDOH.
Compliance u/o XXXIX Rule 3 CPC be filed by
tomorrow
List on 20.08.2026.
Copy of order be given dasti, as prayed for.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2Full order available
    20 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 467/26 SANJAY GUPTA Vs. MANOJ AGGARWAL 20.08.2026 Present: Shri Ravinder Malik, Ld. counsel for plaintiff. Shri Ankur, Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 (Through VC). Summons issued to D-2 to D-5 received back served. Between the intervening dates, WS alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing WS and reply to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. Copy supplied.…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 59 CS SCJ 467/26
SANJAY GUPTA Vs. MANOJ AGGARWAL
17.04.2026
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Shri Jassimran Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the
defendant in the prescribed proforma on filing of PF/RC. Steps
be taken within one week.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff request
that the status quo may be maintained and the defendants may be
restrained from entering in the suit property till NDOH. Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon a registered sale deed in
the favour of plaintiff.
Considering the submission and the fact that the suit
of plaintiff is for permanent injunction and that if ad-interim
injunction is not granted, plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss.
Accordingly, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo
till NDOH.
Compliance u/o XXXIX Rule 3 CPC be filed by
tomorrow
List on 20.08.2026.
Copy of order be given dasti, as prayed for.
(SAKSHI JAISWAL)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.