Full Order Text
Order 7 · 09 Aug 2023 · CNR DLNT030003372023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 185/23 Badshah Ali Vs. Yashpal 09/08/2023 One of the regular Stenographer is on leave and no substitute has been provided. Present : Sh. Dheeraj Pandey and Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsels for Plaintiff. Defendant nos. 1 & 3 alongwith Sh. Avinash Pandey, Ld. Counsel for all the Defendants. I have perused the Report filed under the signature of Sh. Raman V. R., Tehsildar, Civil Lines. Vide said Report, some more time is prayed for. The Tehsildar concerned be noticed in terms of order dated 19/04/2023 for the next date. Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that as the demarcation process is yet to start, the Status Quo order may be passed qua the suit property as construction is being done by the Defendants on the suit property and would defeat the purpose of allowing the application under Order XXVI CPC. Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff has also submitted that the Order dated 19/04/2023 itself makes it clear that the Plaintiff has also prayed for Status Quo order qua the suit property, that the application was also allowed and it seems that the Order qua Status Quo left to be mentioned in the Contd..... -- 1 of 3 -- -/2/- said order. Ld. Counsel for Defendant sought a passover to file written objections. Allowed. Put up at 12:30 p.m. ( Rajani Ranga ) SCJ / RC/ North Rohini Court / 09/08/2023 Present : Sh. Dheeraj Pandey and Sh. Ajit Singh, Ld. Counsels for Plaintiff. Defendant nos. 1 & 3 alongwith Sh. Avinash Pandey, Ld. Counsel for all the Defendants. Written objections / submissions filed. Taken on record. Copy be supplied. Submissions are heard in part on the application moved under Order XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC by the Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff. Record perused. There is dispute over the suit property. The Plaintiff claims that suit property falls under Khasra No. 265/13 whereas the Defendants claim that it falls under Khasra No. 266/173 and belongs to them. Vide order dated 19/04/2023, the Ld. Predecessor has directed the Tehsildar concerned to carry out the demarcation qua the property bearing no. 265/173 (13-12), 265/173 Contd..... -- 2 of 3 -- -/3/- (2-8) and Khasra No. 266/173 of Village – Mukundpur, Delhi at the cost of plaintiff. As per report filed today by the Tehsildar, (Civil Lines), post of Kanoongo is essential to carry out the demarcation of any land and a file has been moved to Ld. DM (Central) for approval of Sh. Deepender, ASO, to do work of Kanoongo and some more time is sought to comply with the order. The carrying out of construction work on the suit property by the Defendants is not denied by the Ld. Counsel appearing for them. Under these circumstances as well as in the larger interest of justice and considering that if the Status Quo order is not passed the order dated 19/04/2023 will be frustrated, both the parties are directed to maintain the Status Quo qua the suit property till the next date. Put up on 01/11/2023 for further hearing on the application / filing of report by the Tehsildar. ( Rajani Ranga ) SCJ / RC/ North Rohini Court / 09/08/2023 -- 3 of 3 --
