Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company / 0 (Adarsh Nagar) 17.03.2026 Present: Ms. Himanshi, Ld. counsel for the complainant. I take cognizance of offence U/s 138 NI Act. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr." (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered. In view…
JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil RamchandaniVsManish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company
TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 1391/2025
- Registration Date
- 31 Jul 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 27 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Acts & Sections
1Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Adarsh Nagar
- FIR Number / Year
- 0
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 06-08-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2025 Date: 13-09-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2026 Date: 24-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026 Date: 17-03-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2026 Date: 29-07-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 21792/2025 Filing Date: 30-07-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230001789C202500014 eFiling Date: 30-07-2025 First Hearing Date: 06th August 2025 Court Number And Judge: 462-Judicial Magistrate First Class
Orders
8Interim Order 429 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 32 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company /0 (Adarsh Nagar) 29.07.2026 Present: Ms. Himanshi, Ld. counsel for the complainant. Previous order not complied. Ld. counsel for the complainant stated that PF was filed on 01.04.2026 tracking report filed. Taken on record. No delivery report is visible in the tracking report filed. Screenshot/service through whatsapp filed. No double tick is visible in the screenshot. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all permissible modes, on filing of PF. PF be filed within 7 days. Put up for appearance of accused on 27.11.2026. (Divyashree Raina) JMFC/04(North) Rohini Courts Delhi/29.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 224 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company / 0 (Adarsh Nagar) 24.01.2026 (Ld. PO is on leave today) Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant with AR of complainant. Physical file submitted today. Matter is at the stage of arguments on cognizance. Put up for purpose fixed on 17.03.2026. Link JMFC/(North) Rohini Courts Delhi/24.01.2026/Court No. 14 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 80CC NI ACT/1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs.Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, RoyalFruit Company/0 (Adarsh Nagar) 06.08.2025 (Proceedings conducted through Cisco Webex) Present: Sh.Yash Bakolia, Ld. Counsel for Complainant. None for Accused. Ld. Counsel for the complainant has moved an application for condonation of delay along with e-filing history. Heard. Perused. Considered. The reason for delay is technical and without any fault of the complainant. Hence applications stands allowed.…
Order 429 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 32 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company /0 (Adarsh Nagar) 29.07.2026 Present: Ms. Himanshi, Ld. counsel for the complainant. Previous order not complied. Ld. counsel for the complainant stated that PF was filed on 01.04.2026 tracking report filed. Taken on record. No delivery report is visible in the tracking report filed. Screenshot/service through whatsapp filed. No double tick is visible in the screenshot. Issue fresh summons to the accused through all permissible modes, on filing of PF. PF be filed within 7 days. Put up for appearance of accused on 27.11.2026. (Divyashree Raina) JMFC/04(North) Rohini Courts Delhi/29.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company / 0 (Adarsh Nagar) 17.03.2026 Present: Ms. Himanshi, Ld. counsel for the complainant. I take cognizance of offence U/s 138 NI Act. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr." (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered. In view…
Order 224 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40 CC NI ACT / 1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs. Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, Royal Fruit Company / 0 (Adarsh Nagar) 24.01.2026 (Ld. PO is on leave today) Present: Ld. Counsel for complainant with AR of complainant. Physical file submitted today. Matter is at the stage of arguments on cognizance. Put up for purpose fixed on 17.03.2026. Link JMFC/(North) Rohini Courts Delhi/24.01.2026/Court No. 14 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 80CC NI ACT/1391/2025 JCO Traders through Authorized Representative Mr Sunil Ramchandani Vs.Manish Kumar Nagpal Proprietor, RoyalFruit Company/0 (Adarsh Nagar) 06.08.2025 (Proceedings conducted through Cisco Webex) Present: Sh.Yash Bakolia, Ld. Counsel for Complainant. None for Accused. Ld. Counsel for the complainant has moved an application for condonation of delay along with e-filing history. Heard. Perused. Considered. The reason for delay is technical and without any fault of the complainant. Hence applications stands allowed.…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
