Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

PRATIBHAVsSalma

CNR DLNT020202572026462-Judicial Magistrate First Class
Rohini North, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1351/2026
Registration Date
04 Jul 2026
Next Hearing Date
27 Feb 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1PRATIBHA

    Respondent

    1. 1Salma

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-07-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Conciliation
    Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2026
    
    Date: 15-07-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2026
    
    Date: 08-10-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 20257/2026
    Filing Date: 01-07-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20240007562C202600011
    eFiling Date: 30-06-2026
    First Hearing Date: 04th July 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 462-Judicial Magistrate First Class

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    08 Oct 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 54 CC NI ACT / 1351/2026 pratibha Vs. salma / () 08.10.2026 Undersigned has a pendency of approximately 4500 cases. Present: Sh. Pankaj Maurya, Ld. counsel for the complainant. Accused absent. Following the law laid down in Sanjaviz Tari vs Kishore S. Borcar in Crl. Appeal No 1755/2010 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the requirement to hear the proposed accused at the time of summoning U/s 223 BNSS is dispensed…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    08 Oct 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 54 CC NI ACT / 1351/2026 pratibha Vs. salma / () 08.10.2026 Undersigned has a pendency of approximately 4500 cases. Present: Sh. Pankaj Maurya, Ld. counsel for the complainant. Accused absent. Following the law laid down in Sanjaviz Tari vs Kishore S. Borcar in Crl. Appeal No 1755/2010 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the requirement to hear the proposed accused at the time of summoning U/s 223 BNSS is dispensed…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.