Interim Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 54 Ct. Cases 1418/2023 GREENLAND FINANCE AND LEASING
LTD Vs. AJAY TANEJA
00/2023 (Adarsh
Nagar)
07.04.2025
Present: None.
Matter is listed today for orders on the point of summoning.
It is pertinent to mention here that clarifications were needed from the complainant qua the
point of summoning, however, since written arguments have been placed on record on behalf of the complainant,
after the last date of hearing, now, no clarifications are required.
Put up for orders at 2.00pm.
(Garima Jindal)
Judicial Magistrate First Class-06,
North District
Rohini Courts,Delhi/
07.04.2025
At 2.00pm
Present: None.
Matter is listed today for orders on the point of summoning.
The facts of the complaint in brief are that the complainant is a NBFC registered with RBI
and Sh. Umesh Sharma is its AR authorized to represent the complainant. It is averred that accused sought
financial assistance to the tune of Rs. 10,75,000/- for vehice bearing no. DL8CAY7281. Acceding to the requests,
complainant granted the said loan to accused and the same was to be repaid in 36 montly installments out of which
first EMI amounted to Rs. 40,250/- and rest 35 amounted to Rs. 39,700/- commencing from 20.10.2019 and
ending on 20.09.2022. However, accused defaulted and did not make timely payments and due to significant delay
in making the repayment, there is an outstanding amount of Rs. 18,29,914/- against the accused as on 19.08.2023.
The complainant thereafter, issued a legal demand notice to the accused and finding no other option, approached
the court u/s 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 wherein directions were passed by the court to seize
vehicle. Thereafter, complainant tried to trace the said vehicle but remained unsuccessful. It is
further averred that accused approached at the registered office of the complainant in a preplanned conspiracy and
has dishonestly and fraudulently concealed the loan vehicle at some unknown place. It is averred that complainant
apprehends that accused has dishonestly misappropriated the vehicle by transferring interest in vehicle to some
other person in contravention of law and contract.
ATR was filed by the inquiry officer and thereafter on 06.03.2024, Ld. counsel for the
complainant chose to withdraw the application u/s 156(3) of Cr.PC filed on behalf of the complainant and
thereafter, matter was listed for PSE.
In order to prove its contentions, the complainant has examined its AR – Sh. Umesh Sharma
as CW-1 who, during his evidence, reiterated the facts stated in the complaint.
Heard. Record perused.
On the basis of the aforesaid testimony of witnesses, prima facie case is made out against the
accused u/s 206/421 of IPC. Accordingly, summons be issued against the accused, on filing of PF, returnable for
21.07.2025.
(Garima Jindal)
Judicial Magistrate First Class-06
North District
Rohini Courts,Delhi
-- 1 of 1 --