Full Order Text
Order 1 · 13 Apr 2026 · CNR DLNT020065322026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 25 CC NI ACT / 480/2026 ANUP KUMAR GUPTA Vs. ADITYA VASHISHTA /0 (S.P. Badli) 13.04.2026 Present: Sh. Adamaya Pal Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for complainant. Submissions of ld. counsel for complainant heard on the point of summoning of accused. Record perused. Complainant has filed the pre-summoning evidence by way of affidavit along with the relevant documents including the dishonoured cheque, bank return memo, legal notice sent to the accused and proof of sending the legal notice. In the matter of "A C Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr." (2014) 11 Supreme Court Cases 790, Full Bench of The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under:- “29. From a conjoint regarding reading of sections 138, 142 and 145 of the NI Act as well as section 200 of the Code, it is clear that it is open to the Magistrate to issue process on the basis of the contents of the complaint, documents in support thereof and the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of the complaint. Once the complainant files an affidavit in support of the complaint before issuance of the process under section 200 of the Code, it is thereafter open to the Magistrate, if he thinks fit, to call upon the complainant to remain present and to examine him as to the facts contained in the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of his complaint. However, it is a matter of discretion and the Magistrate is not bound to call upon the complainant to remain present before the court and to examine him upon oath for taking decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under section 138 of the NI Act. For the purpose of issuing process under section 200 of the Code, it is open to the Magistrate to rely upon the verification in the form of affidavit filed by the complainant in support of the complaint under section 138 of the NI Act. It is only if and where the Magistrate, after considering the complaint under Section 138 of N I Act documents produced in support thereof and the verification in the form of affidavit of the complainant, is of the view that examination of the complainant or his witness (s) is required, the Magistrate may call -- 1 of 1 --
