Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES
MANISHA MALIKVsRAJENDRA MALIK
CNR DLNT020024172026552-Judicial Magistrate First Class
Rohini North, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 126/2026
- Registration Date
- 22 Jan 2026
- Next Hearing Date
- 04 Mar 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Appearance
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita · Sec 223
Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Shabad Dairy
- FIR Number / Year
- 0
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 22-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Proper.Order. Next Hearing Date: 11-05-2026 Date: 11-05-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Proper.Order. Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2026 Date: 28-07-2026 Business: mm05-north@ddc.nic.in Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2026 Date: 29-09-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 2417/2026 Filing Date: 20-01-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20230006396C202600006 eFiling Date: 20-01-2026 First Hearing Date: 22nd January 2026 Court Number And Judge: 552-Judicial Magistrate First Class
Orders
2Interim Order 128 Jul 2026
28 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 104 Ct. Cases / 126/2026 MANISHA MALIK Vs. Rajendra Malik /0 (Shabad Dairy) 28.07.2026 Present: Complainant in person with Sh.Mohit Pratap and Ms.Sanchaya Bansal, ld. counsel. Heard on the application u/s 175(3) BNSS. I have perused the file. SHO, PS concerned is directed to file an action taken report stating the following: 1. Whether any complaint has been made/received by the complainant in the police station. 2. If yes, whether any action has been taken on the complaint. 3. Whether as a result of investigation/inquiry, any cognizable offence has been made out against the accused person and whether any action has been taken by the police. 4. If yes, whether any FIR has been registered & status of investigation. 5. If no cognizable offence has been made out, whether the complainant has been informed accordingly. Copy of the complainant alongwith the annexures be supplied to the concerned Naib Court for compliance. ATR be called from the SHO concerned returnable for 29.09.2026. (BHARTI BENIWAL) Judicial Magistrate First Class-05 North Rohini Courts New Delhi 28.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 128 Jul 2026
28 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 104 Ct. Cases / 126/2026 MANISHA MALIK Vs. Rajendra Malik /0 (Shabad Dairy) 28.07.2026 Present: Complainant in person with Sh.Mohit Pratap and Ms.Sanchaya Bansal, ld. counsel. Heard on the application u/s 175(3) BNSS. I have perused the file. SHO, PS concerned is directed to file an action taken report stating the following: 1. Whether any complaint has been made/received by the complainant in the police station. 2. If yes, whether any action has been taken on the complaint. 3. Whether as a result of investigation/inquiry, any cognizable offence has been made out against the accused person and whether any action has been taken by the police. 4. If yes, whether any FIR has been registered & status of investigation. 5. If no cognizable offence has been made out, whether the complainant has been informed accordingly. Copy of the complainant alongwith the annexures be supplied to the concerned Naib Court for compliance. ATR be called from the SHO concerned returnable for 29.09.2026. (BHARTI BENIWAL) Judicial Magistrate First Class-05 North Rohini Courts New Delhi 28.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
