Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 7

CNR DLNT02000790202514 Oct 2026
Rohini North, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 7 · 14 Oct 2026 · CNR DLNT020007902025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CC NI ACT / 111/2025
SANJAY RANA Vs. NAVEEN /0 (Narela Ind. Area)
14.10.2026
Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that complainant does not have the
ikrarnama/agreement to sell dated 20.06.2024 in his possession.
The case is at the stage of orders on summoning of the accused regarding
the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act,
1881.
Submissions of Ld. Counsel for complainant heard on the point of
summoning of accused.
Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that he does not have the case file.
Record perused.
The case is at the stage of consideration of a complaint regarding the
commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act,
1861.
Submissions of Ld. Counsel for complainant heard on the point of
summoning of accused. Record perused.
Complainant has filed the pre-summoning evidence by way of affidavit
along with the relevant documents including the dishonoured cheque, bank return memo,
legal notice sent to the accused and proof of sending the legal notice.
All the statutory requirements under NI Act are complied with. The present
complaint case is filed within limitation. After perusal of the entire record and in view of
judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr (2025)
SC 952, this Court is of the considered opinion that prima facie case punishable U/s 138 of
NI Act is made out against the accused. I, therefore, take cognizance of the said offence.
Conti...
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Following the law laid down in
A.C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra &
Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered.
Upon perusal of the documents on record, this court is of the prima facie
view that statutory requirements of Section 138 are met and there seems to be sufficient
ground to proceed against the accused.
In view of the above, accused Naveen is summoned for offence U/s 138 NI
Act.
Since Ld. Counsel for accused is present before the Court today, there does
not arise any need to issue summons to the accused.
Put for consideration on bail and framing of notice on 19.05.2027.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
JMFC/NI ACT COURT
NORTH DISTRICT ROHINI
14.10.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.