Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
CS (COMM.) 6890/24
SONIA GUPTA, THROUGH SPA HOLDER VIPIN GUPTA
Vs.
TARIQUE MOHD
07.08.2025
Present: Shri Vinod Goel, Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
The defendant had filed WS on the last date i.e.
27.05.2025 after service on 11.02.2025.
Perusal of the WS shows that it has not been signed
by defendant on each and every page. It is not accompanied by
statement of truth and affidavit of admission of denial of
documents. The WS was filed after elapse of statutory period of
30 days and despite it the condonation application has not been
filed.
In view of judgment "Mayank Gupta Vs. Aditya
Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. 2023 SCC Online Delhi 1485" in
which the Hon'ble Delhi High Court relied upon "Unilin Beheer
B.V. Vs. Balaji Action Buildwell, 2019 SCC Online Del. 8498",
such piece of paper does not constitute written statement. WS is
deficient and is not proper and hence it is taken off record.
No one is responding for the defendant and hence
the defendant is proceeded ex-parte. The defendant shall have
limited right to cross examine plaintiff's witnesses.
Now to come up for un-contested P.E on 10.11.2025.
( Umed Singh Grewal )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/07.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --