SANCHIT TAYALVsSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
CR Rev 338-2025
SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)
10.07.2026
Ld. Regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave today and
Substitute Addl. PP is looking after the work of two courts.
Present : Sh. Hariom Goyal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld.
Subs.APP.
Sh. Ritik Duggal, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2.
1. It is jointly submitted that the matter has been settled out
of Court and after grant of mutual consent divorce parties would be
moving Hon’ble High Court seeking quashing of the present FIR.
2. On request, to come up for further proceedings on
31.07.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/10.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12CR Rev/338/2025SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT
OFDELHI622/2022 (PrashantVihar)
06.03.2026
Regular stenographer is on leave today.
Present : Mr. Hariom, Ld counsel for revisioninst.
Respondent no. 1 is state represented through Ld PP.
Ld counsel for respondent 2 through VC.
1. Reply not filed on behalf of R2. Ld counsel for R2 seeks some more time
for the same. The request is allowed. Even otherwise it is submitted that mediation
proceedings are pending between the parties before the mediation centre, Hon’ble
Delhi High Court.
2. Reply be filed on or before NDOH with a copy to the revisionist.
3. To come up for the above purpose on 10.07.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12	12
CR Rev 338-2025	CR Rev 338-2025
SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI	SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)	622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)
23.01.2026
One regular Stenographer is on leave today and no substitute has
been provided.
Present : Mr. Hariom, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
Mr. Fanish K. Jain and Mr. Abhishek Shokeen, Ld.
Proxy Counsels for respondent no.2.
Ld. Main Counsel for respondent no.2 (through VC).
1. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 is directed to file reply, if
any on or before the next date of hearing with a copy to the
opposite party.
2. To come up for the above purpose on 06.03.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CR Rev / 338/2025
SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)
31.07.2026
Ld. Addditional PP is on leave today.
Ld. Substitute Additional PP is looking after the work of two
courts.
Both the regular Stenographers of this Court are on leave today.
Present: Ms. Sandeep Kaur, Ld. Substitute Additional PP for the
State.
Sh. Hari Om, Ms. Preeti & Ms. Khushi Singhal, Ld.
Counsels for respondent no. 01.
None on behalf of respondent no. 02.
It is stated that quashing petition is under consideration
of the Hon’ble High Court.
On request, put up on 25.11.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
CR Rev 338-2025
SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)
10.07.2026
Ld. Regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave today and
Substitute Addl. PP is looking after the work of two courts.
Present : Sh. Hariom Goyal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld.
Subs.APP.
Sh. Ritik Duggal, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2.
1. It is jointly submitted that the matter has been settled out
of Court and after grant of mutual consent divorce parties would be
moving Hon’ble High Court seeking quashing of the present FIR.
2. On request, to come up for further proceedings on
31.07.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/10.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12CR Rev/338/2025SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT
OFDELHI622/2022 (PrashantVihar)
06.03.2026
Regular stenographer is on leave today.
Present : Mr. Hariom, Ld counsel for revisioninst.
Respondent no. 1 is state represented through Ld PP.
Ld counsel for respondent 2 through VC.
1. Reply not filed on behalf of R2. Ld counsel for R2 seeks some more time
for the same. The request is allowed. Even otherwise it is submitted that mediation
proceedings are pending between the parties before the mediation centre, Hon’ble
Delhi High Court.
2. Reply be filed on or before NDOH with a copy to the revisionist.
3. To come up for the above purpose on 10.07.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12	12
CR Rev 338-2025	CR Rev 338-2025
SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI	SANCHIT TAYAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)	622/2022 (Prashant Vihar)
23.01.2026
One regular Stenographer is on leave today and no substitute has
been provided.
Present : Mr. Hariom, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
Mr. Fanish K. Jain and Mr. Abhishek Shokeen, Ld.
Proxy Counsels for respondent no.2.
Ld. Main Counsel for respondent no.2 (through VC).
1. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 is directed to file reply, if
any on or before the next date of hearing with a copy to the
opposite party.
2. To come up for the above purpose on 06.03.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/23.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --