PRAVEEN BANSALVsPawan Kumar etc +4 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
06.08.2026
Present: Sh. Aakash Parashar, Counsel for plaintiffs via VC.
Defendant in person (earlier was D1).
Application was filed by the plaintiffs u/o 22 Rule 3
CPC qua P1 and another application under Order 32 Rule 1 CPC.
Their copies be supplied to the opposite counsel within a week
against acknowledgment, whereafter the replies be then filed.
To come up for completion of pleadings regarding
the aforesaid applications on 05.10.2026.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/06.08.2026/ak
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
02.04.2026.
Present: Sh. Akash Parasar, counsel for the plaintiffs.
Defendant in person.
Remaining defendants were deleted on
06.08.2025.
P1 has passed away. Time sought to file application
for substitution of his LRs.
To come up for further proceedings on 06.08.2026.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 02.04.2026(T)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
26.11.2025
Present : Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Defendant (earlier D-1) in person.
The D-2 to D-6 were deleted on 06.08.2025. The
relevant amended memo be filed in due course.
The WS of defendant (earlier D-1) is already on
record.
The pleadings of the contesting parties are complete
whereby, the following issues are framed:
1. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
declaration, as prayed for? OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
partition, as prayed for? OPP.
3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
permanent injunction, as prayed for? OPP.
4. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
rendition of accounts, as prayed for? OPP.
5. Relief.
No other issue arises or being pressed.
To come up for PE by way of affidavit on 02.04.2026.
Interim order to continue in the meantime.
The advance copy of the affidavit of the PW be
supplied to the opposite party at least one week in advance before
the NDOH.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 26.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
06.08.2025
Present: Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Sh. Sarabjeet Singh, LAC for D-1.
D-2 to D-6 unserved.
At request on behalf of Counsel for the plaintiff, D-2
to D-6 are deleted from the array of parties being irrelevant
parties. Amended memo of parties be filed in due course.
The defendant seeks time to file the Written
statement. That be filed in due course.
To come up for completion of pleadings, admission-
denial of documents and framing of issues on 26.11.2025.
Interim order, if any, to continue till next date of
hearing.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 06.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24
Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar Etc
27.11.2024
Present: Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for plaintiffs (through
VC).
Sh. Vikash Chauhan, LAC for D-1 with D-1.
None for D-2 to D-6.
Heard. Perused.
Process qua D-2 to D-6 has been received back
unserved alongwith report. Report perused.
Authority letter has been filed on behalf of D-1 and
ld. LAC for D-1 submits that D-2 to D-6 were tenants and they
have already vacated the suit property.
Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for
verifying the same.
D-1 is directed to file WS within stipulated time
with advance copy to opposite party.
Now to come up on 27.03.2025 for completion of
pleadings, admission-denial of documents and framing of issues.
Till next date of hearing, parties are directed to
maintain status-quo regarding ownership as well as possession of
suit property.
(Deepak Dabas)
District Judge(North)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 27.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24
PRAVEEN BANSAL VS. PAWAN KUMAR ETC
28.10.2024
Fresh suit received on assignment. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Aakash Parashar, counsel for plaintiffs.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of application
u/o 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC to defendants on filing of PF/RC/Speed
Post/Courier as well as through approved electronic modes,
returnable on 27.11.2024.
Steps be taken within 07 working days.
(Deepak Dabas)
DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts
Delhi/28.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 42 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
05.10.2026
Present : As before.
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Put up for the purpose already fixed on 15.02.2027.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(North)/Rohini Courts,
Delhi/05.10.2026(RJ)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
06.08.2026
Present: Sh. Aakash Parashar, Counsel for plaintiffs via VC.
Defendant in person (earlier was D1).
Application was filed by the plaintiffs u/o 22 Rule 3
CPC qua P1 and another application under Order 32 Rule 1 CPC.
Their copies be supplied to the opposite counsel within a week
against acknowledgment, whereafter the replies be then filed.
To come up for completion of pleadings regarding
the aforesaid applications on 05.10.2026.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/06.08.2026/ak
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
02.04.2026.
Present: Sh. Akash Parasar, counsel for the plaintiffs.
Defendant in person.
Remaining defendants were deleted on
06.08.2025.
P1 has passed away. Time sought to file application
for substitution of his LRs.
To come up for further proceedings on 06.08.2026.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 02.04.2026(T)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
26.11.2025
Present : Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Defendant (earlier D-1) in person.
The D-2 to D-6 were deleted on 06.08.2025. The
relevant amended memo be filed in due course.
The WS of defendant (earlier D-1) is already on
record.
The pleadings of the contesting parties are complete
whereby, the following issues are framed:
1. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
declaration, as prayed for? OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
partition, as prayed for? OPP.
3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
permanent injunction, as prayed for? OPP.
4. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the decree of
rendition of accounts, as prayed for? OPP.
5. Relief.
No other issue arises or being pressed.
To come up for PE by way of affidavit on 02.04.2026.
Interim order to continue in the meantime.
The advance copy of the affidavit of the PW be
supplied to the opposite party at least one week in advance before
the NDOH.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 26.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS DJ 861/24 Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar etc
06.08.2025
Present: Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Sh. Sarabjeet Singh, LAC for D-1.
D-2 to D-6 unserved.
At request on behalf of Counsel for the plaintiff, D-2
to D-6 are deleted from the array of parties being irrelevant
parties. Amended memo of parties be filed in due course.
The defendant seeks time to file the Written
statement. That be filed in due course.
To come up for completion of pleadings, admission-
denial of documents and framing of issues on 26.11.2025.
Interim order, if any, to continue till next date of
hearing.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 06.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24
Praveen Bansal Vs. Pawan Kumar Etc
27.11.2024
Present: Sh. Akash Parashar, Counsel for plaintiffs (through
VC).
Sh. Vikash Chauhan, LAC for D-1 with D-1.
None for D-2 to D-6.
Heard. Perused.
Process qua D-2 to D-6 has been received back
unserved alongwith report. Report perused.
Authority letter has been filed on behalf of D-1 and
ld. LAC for D-1 submits that D-2 to D-6 were tenants and they
have already vacated the suit property.
Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for
verifying the same.
D-1 is directed to file WS within stipulated time
with advance copy to opposite party.
Now to come up on 27.03.2025 for completion of
pleadings, admission-denial of documents and framing of issues.
Till next date of hearing, parties are directed to
maintain status-quo regarding ownership as well as possession of
suit property.
(Deepak Dabas)
District Judge(North)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 27.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS DJ 861/24
PRAVEEN BANSAL VS. PAWAN KUMAR ETC
28.10.2024
Fresh suit received on assignment. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Aakash Parashar, counsel for plaintiffs.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice of application
u/o 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC to defendants on filing of PF/RC/Speed
Post/Courier as well as through approved electronic modes,
returnable on 27.11.2024.
Steps be taken within 07 working days.
(Deepak Dabas)
DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts
Delhi/28.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --