Interim Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 6842/24
MS MAHENDER FLOUR MILL Vs. SWASTIK GENERAL
STORE
18.08.2025
Present: Sh. Shubham Aggarwal and Sh. Himanshu,
Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff.
Sh. Prashant Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants
through VC.
Ms. Mamta Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1 through VC.
Cost has already been paid by the defendants.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks adjournment on
the ground that she is not well and is in the hospital. She also
seeks time to file fresh vakalatnama.
The previous counsel submits that he may be
discharged from the vakalatnama. There are two defendants and
Ms. Mamta Sharma is appearing only for defendant no. 1.
Infacts, counsel Sh. Prashant Sharma cannot be discharged on
behalf of the defendant no. 2.
The defendants were directed to file fresh affidavit
of admission/denial in respect of each and every invoice on
08.04.2025. This fresh affidavit was filed on last date, but even
in this fresh affidavit, 40 invoices were missing and there was
also repetition of invoices from serial no. 170. No reason has
been given for non-appearance of the defendants today. The
documents of the plaintiff for which there is no specific denial
with reasons, shall be deemed to be admitted.
Put up for arguments on the injunction application,
admission/denial, framing of issues and case management
hearing on 08.10.2025.
...contd.2
-- 1 of 2 --
: 2 :
In view of these facts, the interim order to continue
till the next date of hearing.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
18.08.2025
-- 2 of 2 --