Final Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Bail Matters 1867/2024 & 1868/2024
SUBASINI PANDA Vs. STATE
LOPAMUDRA PRIYADARSHINYEE Vs. STATE
FIR No. 192 /2022
PS Cyber Police Station
U/s. 420 IPC
13.12.2024
These two applications U/s. 482 BNSS for grant of
anticipatory bail moved on behalf of applicants/accused persons
namely Subasini Panda and Lopamudra Priyadarshinyee are placed
before me in terms of order No. 32313-336 Judl. /Bail /North /RC
/2024, dated 29.10.2024 of Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge,
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
Present: Sh. Sanjay Jindal, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Tejpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
Sh. Shikhar Sharma and Sh. Prasenjit Mitra, Ld.
counsels for applicant/accused.
Reply to the above said application has already been
received.
Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused persons submits that
applicants/accused persons have not commited no ofence and till date
they have no knowledge about the allegations againt them. It is further
submitted that applicants/accused persons are willing to join the
investigation . It is further submitted that applicants/accused persons
have never been involved in any criminal or civil cases. It is prayed
that above said application may kindly be allowed.
On the other hand, Ld. Additional PP for State strongly
opposed the bail application and submitted that allegations against the
applicant/accused are serious in nature. It is prayed that the above said
application may kindly be dismissed.
This court has given thoughtful consideration to the
Continued to page no. 2
-- 1 of 2 --
Page No. 2
Bail Matters 1867/2024 & 1868/2024
SUBASINI PANDA Vs. STATE
LOPAMUDRA PRIYADARSHINYEE Vs. STATE
FIR No. 192 /2022
PS Cyber Police Station
U/s. 420 IPC
submissions made by Ld. counsel for applicant/accused and Ld.
Additional PP for State and has also perused the record placed before
the same.
It is pertinent to mention that in the present case, no FIR has
been registered till date. A complaint has been received from
complainant wherein allegations of committing internet banking fraud
to the tune of Rs. 4,55,000/- has been made and both the
applicants/accused persons are beneficaries of cheated amount. As the
allegations against applicants/accused persons are serious in nature
and keeping in view of the fact that no FIR has been registered till
date, the present applications are seem to be pre-mature. Same are
dismissed, accordingly.
Nothing stated herein shall tantamount to any expression of
opinion the merits of the case. Copy of order be given dasti to the
applicants/accused persons. The present bail applications be consigned
to record room.
(Sushil Kumar)
Addl. Sessions Judge- 04
North District Rohini Courts Delhi
13.12.2024
-- 2 of 2 --