Interim Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 34
IA 1-26 in SC 6992-25
State Vs. Sumit Dahiya
FIR No. 478/25
PS : Narela
06.07.2026
Matter is being taken up today on an application u/s 483 BNSS
moved on behalf of applicant/accused seeking interim bail.
Present : Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Ms. Dolly Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the
applicant/accused.
1. This is an application u/s 483 BNSS moved on behalf of
applicant/accused Sumit Dahiya seeking interim bail for a period
of 60 days on the ground of procreating/having a child.
2. IO has filed reply. The same is taken on record.
3. Arguments heard. Record perused. Ld. Counsel for the
applicant/accused submits that accused/applicant is behind bars for
more than eight months; he is a married man and wants to
procreate/have a child and therefore, the present application has been
filed.
4. Ld. Addl. PP for the State has strongly opposed the present
application and has prayed for its dismissal.
5. I have heard Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused, Ld.
Addl. PP for the State and have perused the record. The allegations
against the accused are of gravest kind i.e. murder. In the considered
opinion of this Court, ground stated i.e. having a child/procreation of
child is not a valid ground for release of accused/applicant on interim
bail. In the above facts and circumstances and in view of nature and
contd……
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
IA 1-26 in SC 6992-25
State Vs. Sumit Dahiya
FIR No. 478/25
PS : Narela
gravity of offence, no ground is made out to grant interim bail to
the applicant/accused. The present application is accordingly
dismissed.
6. Copy of this order be given dasti to the Ld. Counsel for the
accused and to the IO and be also sent to Jail Superintendent for
information.
7. The present application is disposed of in terms of the
above order.
8. Now to come up for purpose fixed on date already fixed.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.07.2026
-- 2 of 2 --