Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 3

CNR DLNT01013123202410 Sept 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 3 · 10 Sept 2024 · CNR DLNT010131232024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 Bail Matters 1570/2024 STATE Vs. ADARSH TRIPATHI
FIR No. 19 /2024
PS (Cyber Police Station)
u/s 419/420 IPC
10.09.2024
Present: Ms. Promila Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Ashutosh, Ld. Counsel for appellant/accused.
Detailed arguments have already been heard. TCR had
been called and perused.
This is a case of cyber fraud. On 01.02.2024,
complainant had received a call from caller who claimed himself
to be from FedEx and told him that he had sent some parcel
which has illegal substances. When the complainant denied of
sending any such parcel, the caller threatened him that an FIR
has been registered against him by the Customs Department. The
caller forced the complainant to have a conversation with some
persons on Skype who misrepresented themselves to be police
officials and obtained the important details of his bank account
and banking transactions.
As per record, cyber fraud of Rs.26 lakhs with
complainant on the pretext of enquiry made by Mumbai Cyber
Crime Cell was done by the applicant along with other co-
accused and unknown persons. Accused is the receiver of the
cheated amount in his account. There are several other
unaccountable transactions in his account. Two mobile phones
were found to be linked with the bank account and both were
found in the name of accused Adarsh Tripathi. Recovery is not
made in the present matter till date, if accused is released at this
-- 1 of 2 --
stage, he can influence the witnesses and can destroy the
evidence.
As such co-accused are still at large.
Allegations against the accused are serious in nature.
Accused has claimed that his bank account and mobile phone
was misused, however, no document as to the blocking of the
mobile phone or account is produced by the accused. There are
transaction of Rs.1.8 crore in the bank account of the accused
without any details. There are apprehensions that accused can
abscond and can influence other witnesses. Seeing the totality of
the facts and circumstances, accordingly, bail application stand
dismissed.
Copy dasti to Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused.
(Shefali Sharma)
Addl. Sessions Judge-02(North)
Rohini Courts Delhi
10.09.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.