Interim Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 308/21
MISC DJ 1457/25
HEMA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER Vs. HRIDHAN
CHAUHAN
MINOR (CS DJ 308/21)
25.02.2026
Present : Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, Counsel for the plaintiffs.
None for the defendant.
The main file has been received from the record
room.
The defendant had not appeared on 13.08.2025 when
the suit was dismissed vide the judgement of the even date.
Hence no notice of the review application is required to be
issued, particularly when the defendant neither filed any WS, nor
participated in the trial.
Arguments heard on the review application. The
Counsel for the plaintiffs states that the judgement dismissing the
suit on 13.08.2025 needs to be reviewed since it suffers from the
error apparent on the face of the record. He states that the perusal
of the conveyance deed PW1/B records that the father of the
plaintiffs was the attorney of the vendor Rama Devi as well as the
vendee. Basically he while acting as the attorney of owner Rama
Devi got executed the conveyance deed from the DDA in his own
favour and thus assumed ownership. The Counsel for the
plaintiffs however points out that the Court inadvertently opined
that the father of the plaintiffs only acted as the attorney and did
not look into the aspect of he getting the conveyance deed
-2-
-- 1 of 2 --
executed in his own favour. Having gone through the record and
particularly the contents of conveyance deed PW1/B, I am in
agreement with the arguments raised as above. This document
clearly shows that the father of the plaintiffs got executed the
conveyance deed in his favour while acting as the attorney of the
erstwhile owner Rama Devi. Hence the judgement dated
13.08.2025 dismissing the suit suffers from error apparent on the
face of the record and is recalled. The Misc. file be tagged with
the main file. This order be retained in the main file of CS DJ
308/21.
Final arguments heard.
Vide separate judgement of the even date, a
preliminary decree of partition is passed in favour of the parties.
Now to come up for starting of the process qua the
passing of the final decree on 05.05.2026.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/ 25.02.2026
-- 2 of 2 --