Full Order Text
Interim Order 4 · 05 Oct 2023 · CNR DLNT010091122023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: IA No. 1-23 SC 524-23 FIR No. 149-23 PS Crime Branch STATE Vs. Rohit Khatri U/sec 20 NDPS Act 05.10.2023 This is third bail application moved on behalf of accused for grant of regular bail. Pr: Sh. P. K Samadhiya, Ld. Substitute Addl. PP for the State. Sh. Rajiv Tehlan, Ld. Counsel for accused/applicant. Reply to the application filed by IO. Arguments heard on the application under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail to accused-applicant. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED/APPLICANT 1. It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and has been lying in Judicial Custody since 30.06.2023. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant-accused that investigation qua the accused/applicant in the matter has already been completed and he is no longer required for purpose of investigation. It is further submitted that charge sheet has already been filed and trial shall considerable time, hence, accused be released on bail as he is ready to abide with any condition imposed by the court, if he be released on bail. In support of his arguments, Ld. Counsel for the accused/applicant has placed reliance on Anil Mahajan Vs. Commissioner of Customs 2000 (2) JCC Delhi 302, Babu Singh Vs. State of U. P. reported in (1978) 5 SCC 579 and Jitender Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 408/2020. FIR No. 149/23 PS Crime Branch 1/3 -- 1 of 3 -- ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATE 2. Per contra, Ld. Addl. P.P for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application stating that as per the reply filed by the IO, on 22.06.2023 on receipt of secret information, accused/applicant Rohit Khatri and co-accused Vishal Kumar were apprehended in a car bearing No. DL9CAT8857 and from their possession Charas weighing 303 grams (Rohit Khatri) and 298 grams (Vishal Kumar) were recovered. It is stated that contraband was seized and both the accused persons were arrested. It is submitted that as per the CDR accused Rohit Khatri and co-accused Vishal were in constant touch since 12.06.2023. It is further submitted that a screenshot was also found in mobile phone of accused Rohit Khatri wherein he transferred Rs. 14,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- on 16.06.2023 to the source namely Raju Thapa. It is further submitted that accused is also involved in other criminal cases and there is every likelihood that accused/applicant may commit further offence of similar nature, if he be released on bail. Submissions heard. Record Perused. I have also gone through the judgments relied upon by Ld. Counsel for the ac- cused/applicant. FINDINGS/CONCLUSION 3. Charge sheet has been filed against the applicant/accused and 303 grams of Charas was allegedly recovered from his possession. The quantity of Charas recovered from applicant falls into intermediate category and therefore, Bar of section 37 NDPS is not applicable to the present case. He is not involved in any other case under NDPS Act. All the witnesses are police officials and therefore, there is no apprehension of threatening them. Investigation qua him is complete and trial shall take a considerable time. Therefore, accused/applicant Rohit Khatri is admitted to bail subject to FIR No. 149/23 PS Crime Branch 2/3 -- 2 of 3 -- furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount on the following conditions: i) That the applicant/accused shall not leave Delhi without prior intimation to the IO/Court either by written intimation or through SMS to IO on mobile phone in advance; ii) That the applicant/accused will supply all numbers of his functioning phones/mobile phones to the IO as well as about his whereabouts. iii) That the applicant/accused shall not tamper with the evidence; iv) That the applicant/accused shall not try to contact in any manner or threat the prosecution witnesses; v) That in case of change of his residential address, he shall intimate the court about the same; vi) That the applicant shall attend the Court on each and every date of hearing without fail. vii) In case of involvement in any criminal case during bail period the bail shall be liable to be cancelled. Nothing in this order shall tantamount to an expression of opinion on the merits of the case during trial. A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent concerned for further communication to the accused/applicant. Copy of this order be also forwarded to Jail Superintendent concerned through E-Mail. (Dhirendra Rana) Special Judge (NDPS): North, Rohini Courts, Delhi 05.10.2023 FIR No. 149/23 PS Crime Branch 3/3 -- 3 of 3 --
