Full Order Text
Interim Order 4 · 06 Feb 2025 · CNR DLNT010083452024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 CS (COMM.) 353/24 Pradeep Kumar Chawla Vs. Dtwelve Spaces Pvt Ltd 06.02.2025 Present: Shri Kamal Jindal, Counsel for plaintiff. Shri Chetan Vahi, counsel for defendant No.1. Counsel for defendant has submitted that defendant No.2 is director and has requested for deletion from the array of defendants. In this regard, the reliance can be placed upon the decision of Delhi High Court in case Mukesh Hans Vs Uma Bhasin, RFA 14/2010 decided on 16-08-2010 in which it was held that Directors can not be held personally responsible for act of company in absence of a personal guarantee or allegations of cheating /misrepresentation. In view of the aforesaid citation, defendant No.2 is deleted from the array of defendants. An application U/o 9 Rule 7 CPC, WS on behalf of defendant No.1, statement of truth, application U/o 8 Rule 1 CPC, certificate U/o 11 Rule 6 of CPC and affidavit of admission/denial of odocuments, list of documents and documents filed by defendant No.1 on 16.01.2025, are already on record. Despite service on 18.09.2024, no one was present on behalf of defendants on 11.11.2024 and 03.12.2024. Both defendants were proceeded ex-parte and their right to file WS was closed on 03.12.2024. So, for getting setting aside ex-parte order, two applications have been moved by defendant No.1, first is U/o 9 Rule 7 CPC and second is U/o 8 Rule 1 CPC. Without commenting on their merit, both are allowed but subject to -- 1 of 2 -- payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by defendant No.1 to the plaintiff on next date of hearing. An application U/o 6 Rule 17 CPC moved by the plaintiff on 14.01.2025 for amendment to the plaint is also there. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted that he wants to add subsequent development in the plaint. The development is that the defendant did not pay him rent for the months of December 2024 and January 2025. It is pertinent to mention here that suit was filed in June 2024 and so the cited facts are subsequent one due to which an application U/o 6 Rule 17 CPC is allowed. Amended plaint is already on record. Copy supplied. Now to come up for filing WS to the amended plaint, affidavit of admission/denial of documents etc. with advance copy to the opposite party who shall file replication by next date with advance copy to the opposite party. The matter be also listed for framing of issues on 28.04.2025. ( Umed Singh Grewal ) District Judge (Commercial)-02 North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.02.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
