Skip to main content
CR Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION

Vishnu GautamVsThe State

CNR DLNT010081842025516-Additional Sessions Judge
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
147/2025
Registration Date
05 Jul 2025
Next Hearing Date
20 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Vishnu Gautam

    Respondent

    1. 1The State

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Cr. P. C. · Sec 397

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 05-07-2025
    Business: fresh
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2025
    
    Date: 09-10-2025
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2026
    
    Date: 20-01-2026
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2026
    
    Date: 01-04-2026
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2026
    
    Date: 02-06-2026
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2026
    
    Date: 24-08-2026
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 3904/2025
    Filing Date: 13-06-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230008254C202500011
    eFiling Date: 12-06-2025
    First Hearing Date: 05th July 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 516-Additional Sessions Judge

    Orders

    10
    Interim Order 5Full order available
    24 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CR Rev No. 147/25 Vishnu Gautam vs State 24.08.2026 One regular steno is on leave today. Ld. Addl. PP for the State is looking after the work of two courts. Present : Sh. K. Raj, Ld. counsel for the revisionist. Sh. Vikas, Ld. Addl. PP for the State Respondents no.1, 2, 4, 6 have beeen served but none has appeared on their behalf. Ld. counsel for the respondent no.9 through V/C Respondents…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 4
    02 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 7CR Rev/147/2025VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE/0 ()
    02.06.2026
    One regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Sh. K.Raj, Ld counsel for the revisionist.
    Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/Respondent 1.
    Ld counsel for the respondent no. 9.
    None for the remaining respondent.
    1. R4 and R6 were served as per report on record but are not
    appearing. They are given liberty for appearance as well as to file reply
    on or before the NDOH.
    2. Issue fresh notice to R1, R2, R5, R7 and R8 on PF/RC
    within seven working days for NDOH.
    3. Notice issued to R3 earlier was received back with
    endoresement on the speed post “no such person”. Accordingly
    revisionist is directed to verify the address of R3 by way of personal visit
    or to file fresh address on or before the NDOH.
    4. To come up for above purpose 24.08.2026.
    5. Reply filed on behalf of R9. Copy supplied to Ld counsel
    for the revisionist.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    01 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: CR Rev No. 147/2025
    Vishnu Gautam vs State
    01.04.2026
    At 2:40 pm.
    Ld. Regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave and Sub.
    Addl. PP for the State is looking after the work of two courts.
    Present: Sh. K. Raj, Ld counsel for the revisionist.
    Sh. Sanjay Jindal, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
    Ld. Counse for the respondent no.9.
    1. The undersigned was busy in pre lunch session in
    Administrative meeting. Certain reports have been received regarding
    service upon the respondents. Same are taken on record.
    2. Put up for further proceedings 02.06.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    A.S.J-03 (North) Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/01.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    20 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6	6
    CR Rev 147-2025	CR Rev 147-2025
    VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE	VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE
    20.01.2026
    The undersigned is also working as Link Judge to the Court of
    Sh. Viplav Dabas, Ld. ASJ/Fast Track Court (North), Rohini
    Courts, Delhi in pre-lunch session today.
    One regular Stenographer is on half day leave (pre-lunch) today.
    Present : Sh. K. Raj, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
    Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
    Remaining respondents are yet to be served.
    1. Ld. Counsel for revisionist has filed Amended Memo of
    Parties alongwith fresh address of Respondent No.2 to No.9.
    The same are taken on record.
    2. Issue fresh notice of the present revision petition to the said
    respondents, on the fresh addresses filed today, on filing of
    PF/RC within 07 working days.
    3. To come up for further proceedings on 01.04.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/20.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    09 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: Vishnu Gautam vs. The State & Ors.
    09.10.2025
    The undersigned has to attend training programme on “Referral
    of cases to ADR for all the judicial officers” from 2 pm onwards
    today at Rohini Courts, Delhi.
    Present : Ld. Counsel for the revisionist.
    Sh. J.S. Malik, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/R-1.
    None for the remaining respondents.
    At this stage, it is noticed that State already stood arrayed
    in the original revision petition. Thus, there is no requirement of
    filing amended memo of parties by the revisionist.
    Court notices issued to respondents no. 2 to 9 have been
    received back unserved with report that they have left the services of
    the company located at the given address.
    Ld. Counsel for the revisionist seeks some more time to
    file fresh addresses of R-2 to R-9.
    To come up for above purpose on 20.01.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5Full order available
    24 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CR Rev No. 147/25 Vishnu Gautam vs State 24.08.2026 One regular steno is on leave today. Ld. Addl. PP for the State is looking after the work of two courts. Present : Sh. K. Raj, Ld. counsel for the revisionist. Sh. Vikas, Ld. Addl. PP for the State Respondents no.1, 2, 4, 6 have beeen served but none has appeared on their behalf. Ld. counsel for the respondent no.9 through V/C Respondents…

    Read Full Order
    Order 4
    02 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 7CR Rev/147/2025VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE/0 ()
    02.06.2026
    One regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Sh. K.Raj, Ld counsel for the revisionist.
    Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/Respondent 1.
    Ld counsel for the respondent no. 9.
    None for the remaining respondent.
    1. R4 and R6 were served as per report on record but are not
    appearing. They are given liberty for appearance as well as to file reply
    on or before the NDOH.
    2. Issue fresh notice to R1, R2, R5, R7 and R8 on PF/RC
    within seven working days for NDOH.
    3. Notice issued to R3 earlier was received back with
    endoresement on the speed post “no such person”. Accordingly
    revisionist is directed to verify the address of R3 by way of personal visit
    or to file fresh address on or before the NDOH.
    4. To come up for above purpose 24.08.2026.
    5. Reply filed on behalf of R9. Copy supplied to Ld counsel
    for the revisionist.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    01 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: CR Rev No. 147/2025
    Vishnu Gautam vs State
    01.04.2026
    At 2:40 pm.
    Ld. Regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave and Sub.
    Addl. PP for the State is looking after the work of two courts.
    Present: Sh. K. Raj, Ld counsel for the revisionist.
    Sh. Sanjay Jindal, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
    Ld. Counse for the respondent no.9.
    1. The undersigned was busy in pre lunch session in
    Administrative meeting. Certain reports have been received regarding
    service upon the respondents. Same are taken on record.
    2. Put up for further proceedings 02.06.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    A.S.J-03 (North) Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/01.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    20 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6	6
    CR Rev 147-2025	CR Rev 147-2025
    VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE	VISHNU GAUTAM Vs. THE STATE
    20.01.2026
    The undersigned is also working as Link Judge to the Court of
    Sh. Viplav Dabas, Ld. ASJ/Fast Track Court (North), Rohini
    Courts, Delhi in pre-lunch session today.
    One regular Stenographer is on half day leave (pre-lunch) today.
    Present : Sh. K. Raj, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
    Respondent No.1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
    Remaining respondents are yet to be served.
    1. Ld. Counsel for revisionist has filed Amended Memo of
    Parties alongwith fresh address of Respondent No.2 to No.9.
    The same are taken on record.
    2. Issue fresh notice of the present revision petition to the said
    respondents, on the fresh addresses filed today, on filing of
    PF/RC within 07 working days.
    3. To come up for further proceedings on 01.04.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/20.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    09 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: Vishnu Gautam vs. The State & Ors.
    09.10.2025
    The undersigned has to attend training programme on “Referral
    of cases to ADR for all the judicial officers” from 2 pm onwards
    today at Rohini Courts, Delhi.
    Present : Ld. Counsel for the revisionist.
    Sh. J.S. Malik, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/R-1.
    None for the remaining respondents.
    At this stage, it is noticed that State already stood arrayed
    in the original revision petition. Thus, there is no requirement of
    filing amended memo of parties by the revisionist.
    Court notices issued to respondents no. 2 to 9 have been
    received back unserved with report that they have left the services of
    the company located at the given address.
    Ld. Counsel for the revisionist seeks some more time to
    file fresh addresses of R-2 to R-9.
    To come up for above purpose on 20.01.2026.
    (JAGMOHAN SINGH)
    ASJ-03, North District
    Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.