Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1
CS DJ 369/24
POONAM GUPTA Vs. TANYA GOEL
05.11.2024
Present: Sh. Amit Chaudhary and Sh. S.K. Kaushik, counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Kuldeep Mansukhani, counsel for defendant no. 1 (through VC
but not audible)
Sh. Rajeev Katyain, counsel for the defendant no. 4.
Sh. Kunal Kashyap, counsel for defendant no. 2.
Counsel for the defendant no. 4 presses for his application dated
26.07.2024 for deletion of name. Counsel for the plaintiff states that he has no
objection as late Sh. Rajat Gupta is son of the plaintiff. Smt. Tanya Goyal is
daughter in law of the plaintiff. Smt. Tanya Goyal has withdrawn amount of Sh.
Rajat Gupta from his accounts in Yes Bank, ICICI Bank and Life Insurance
Corporation. As of now the suit is primarily directed against defendant no. 1.
The no objection statement of the counsel for the plaintiff has been
recorded separately.
Counsel for the defendant no. 4 states that in view of the order
passed he withdraws his application under order 7 rule 11 CPC. The same is
disposed off as withdrawn.
In view of the no objection by counsel for the plaintiff, the
defendant no. 4 is deleted from the array of defendants. Application of
defendant no. 4 is allowed. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 states that he will
move an appropriate application for deletion of his name also. Written
statement and vakalatnama had been filed by defendant no. 2. Copy supplied to
counsel opposite. An application under order 9 rule 7 CPC has been filed by
defendant no. 1. Counsel for the plaintiff states that he already has a copy and
will file reply.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
CS DJ 369/24
POONAM GUPTA Vs. TANYA GOEL
Now to come up for filing of amended memo of parties and for
reply with advance copy to counsel opposite and arguments on application
under order 9 rule 7 CPC.
To come up on 19.02.2025.
(VIKRAM BALI)
DISTRICT JUDGE-2/NORTH/ ROHINI
COURT/DELHI/05.11.2024
-- 2 of 2 --